Fredfelia Pferd mit Süßkartoffeln

Wet Pate · completeHigh meatClear label

Pferd mit Süßkartoffeln
Good
our rating

Our verdict

Is Fredfelia Pferd mit Süßkartoffeln a good dog food?

We score it 76/100 (Good). This reflects the ingredient quality, composition and label transparency of the recipe as declared on the label.

How we score

Why you might choose it

  • Meat makes up an estimated 55% of the dry matter (48% as fed).
  • Prints ingredient percentages on the label.
  • Prints a percentage for nearly every ingredient, so the recipe is fully auditable.

Why you might not

We found no significant drawbacks in the data we hold for this product.

Who is this food for?

Suits

  • Labelled by the manufacturer for adult dogs
  • Grain-free: no grain ingredients listed
  • Single named protein: horse
  • Doesn't list chicken, beef, turkey, lamb, fish, venison, pork, duck as ingredients

These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Find foods that fit your dog.

Ingredients (9)5% of the recipe is estimated

Estimated composition

  • meat 48.0%
  • other 21.0%
  • veg 14.0%
  • carb 12.0%
  • oil 2.9%
  • fibre 1.2%
  • supplement 1.0%
#As declaredMatchedLabel readingDeclared %Est. %
148% HorseHorsemeat · good4848.0
2Water (21%)Waterother2121.0
3Sweet Potatoes (12%)Sweet Potatoescarb · good1212.0
4Beetroot (10%)Beetrootveg · good1010.0
5Apple (4%)Applesveg · good44.0
6Sunflower OilSunflower oiloil · good-1.5
7Linseed OilLinseed oiloil · good-1.3
8Psyllium HusksPsylliumfibre · good-1.2
9MineralsVitamins and mineralssupplement · medium-1.0
  1. 1. 48% Horse48% declared48.0% estimated
    Horse · meat · good
  2. 2. Water (21%)21% declared21.0% estimated
    Water · other
  3. 3. Sweet Potatoes (12%)12% declared12.0% estimated
    Sweet Potatoes · carb · good
  4. 4. Beetroot (10%)10% declared10.0% estimated
    Beetroot · veg · good
  5. 5. Apple (4%)4% declared4.0% estimated
    Apples · veg · good
  6. 6. Sunflower Oil1.5% estimated
    Sunflower oil · oil · good
  7. 7. Linseed Oil1.3% estimated
    Linseed oil · oil · good
  8. 8. Psyllium Husks1.2% estimated
    Psyllium · fibre · good
  9. 9. Minerals1.0% estimated
    Vitamins and minerals · supplement · medium

Nutrition and feedingProtein 10.40% · Fat 2.90%

Typical analysis (as fed)

NutrientAs fed
Protein10.40%
Fat2.90%
Fibre0.40%
Ash1.10%
Moisture80.40%
Calcium0.17%
Phosphorus0.12%

Energy: 91 kcal/100g

Additives & feeding info

Feeding and storage

Storage

Trocken lagern, vor Wärme schützen. Nach dem Öffnen 2 Tage im Kühlschrank haltbar. Bei Zimmertemperatur füttern.

Feeding guide

Kleine Hunde (<20kg): ca. 40-70g pro Tag je 1 kg Körpergewicht; Große Hunde (>20kg): ca. 30-55g pro Tag je 1 kg Körpergewicht. Richtwerte, individueller Bedarf variiert.

Additives declared on the label

Nutritional additives

Vitamin A 8100 IE; Vitamin B1 2,5 mg; Vitamin B2 1,6 mg; Vitamin B5 (Pantothensäure) 4,0 mg; Vitamin B7 (Biotin) 64,0 mcg; Vitamin B12 17,5 mcg; Vitamin D3 300 IE; Vitamin E 18,9 mg; Eisen (Eisen-II-Sulfat Monohydrat) 27,5 mg; Kupfer (Kupfer-II-Sulfat Pentahydrat) 3,0 mg; Zink (Zinksulfat Monohydrat) 17,0 mg; Mangan (Mangan-II-Oxid) 2,4 mg; Jod (Calciumjodat) 0,64 mg; Selen (Natriumselenit) 0,05 mg; Cholin (Cholinchlorid) 380 mg; Kieselsäure 150 mg

Trust and sourceNo recalls recorded in our database · checked 2026-09-19

Brand and contact: Fredfelia
Fredfelia logo
Phone
+49 (0)951 / 912 790 79

Trust and provenance

Recall history
No recalls recorded in our database
Label data last checked
2026-09-19
Scored with
Model v3 (methodology)
Product page
www.fredfelia.com

Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.

External platform ratings are not scores for this individual recipe.

Trustpilot: 3.8/5 · 18 reviews

633 reviews on this product · 4.8/5

Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.

Score details and methodologyCalculations, history and evidence

Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated

Why this score?

The overall score is 76 out of 100. The overall quality of the ingredient list contributed +7.6 points. The meat content contributed +5.3 points, and being labelled nutritionally complete contributed +2.3 points. The remaining ingredients reduced the score by -1.6 points.

Scored with model v3 on 2026-10-25. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.

ComponentInputCoefficientContribution
Base score-30.909+30.91
Average ingredient quality0.89.191+7.61
Meat share of dry matter55.2%0.096+5.29
Carb share of dry matter12.3%-0.115-1.42
Oil share of dry matter11.7%-0.092-1.08
Vegetable share of dry matter8.6%-0.005-0.04
Supplement share of dry matter3.6%-0.012-0.04
Other share of dry matter4.3%-0.375-1.61
Undeclared quantities5.0%-0.106-0.53
Complete dietyes2.294+2.29
High meat (30%+ of dry matter)yes0.707+0.71
Processing multiplier1.0033.786+33.79
Processing: Wet Pateyes-0.672-0.67
Show all 40 components
ComponentInputCoefficientContribution
Base score-30.909+30.91
Average ingredient quality0.89.191+7.61
Meat share of dry matter55.2%0.096+5.29
Carb share of dry matter12.3%-0.115-1.42
Oil share of dry matter11.7%-0.092-1.08
Vegetable share of dry matter8.6%-0.005-0.04
Additive share of dry matter0.0%0.163+0.00
Supplement share of dry matter3.6%-0.012-0.04
Other share of dry matter4.3%-0.375-1.61
Unrecognised share of dry matter0.0%-0.027+0.00
Recipe graded poor0.0%-0.065+0.00
Poor-quality meat in recipe0.0%-0.179+0.00
Number of poor ingredients0-0.876+0.00
Largest single poor ingredient0.0%0.060+0.00
Undeclared quantities5.0%-0.106-0.53
Prints ingredient percentagesno0.000+0.00
Complete dietyes2.294+2.29
Frozen or chilled freshno0.000+0.00
High meat (30%+ of dry matter)yes0.707+0.71
Low meat (under 10% of dry matter)no-3.158+0.00
High carb and low meatno-1.180+0.00
Meat share × printed percentages0.00.000+0.00
Meat share × fresh0.00.000+0.00
Fresh × high meat0.011.084+0.00
Additive penalty0.000.222+0.00
Processing multiplier1.0033.786+33.79
Processing: Rawno-0.054+0.00
Processing: Fresh Chilledno-2.354+0.00
Processing: Fresh Frozenno-2.354+0.00
Processing: Fresh Refrigeratedno0.000+0.00
Processing: Fresh Shelfno-0.672+0.00
Processing: Dry Freeze Driedno6.629+0.00
Processing: Dry Air Driedno6.331+0.00
Processing: Dry Cold Pressedno-6.713+0.00
Processing: Dry Bakedno-6.713+0.00
Processing: Dry Extrudedno-6.713+0.00
Processing: Dry Semi Moistno-6.174+0.00
Processing: Dry Mueslino-10.146+0.00
Processing: Wet Pateyes-0.672-0.67
Processing: Wet Chunksno-0.672+0.00
Processing-type offset
-0.08
Additives declared on label
+1 transparency bonus
Subtotal
76.1
Final score
76/100

Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.

Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges

How the declared analysis compares with FEDIAF reference ranges for adult dogs. The label prints as-fed values; we convert to a dry-matter basis before scoring, and the bands are dry-matter ranges. Scores rise to 100 at the band midpoint: the reference is adequacy, not maximisation. Nutrients with a published upper limit taper again above it; fat is policed through calorie density rather than a direct penalty.

NutrientAs fed (label)Dry matter (scored)Score
Protein10.453.1 (band 20.892857142857153 to 40%)100
Fat2.914.8 (band 6.383928571428575 to 20%)100
Fibre0.42 (band 0.5 to 5%)90.5
Calcium0.170.9 (band 0.5803571428571431 to 2.5%)79
Phosphorus0.120.6 (band 0.4642857142857145 to 1.6%)77.8
Calcium:phosphorus ratio1.41.4 (band 1 to 2%)95
Energy (kcal/100g)91464.3100

Scored over 7 declared nutrients (combined weight 90); undeclared nutrients do not affect the score.

Declared fortification: 16 nutritional additives on the label
  • Vitamin A 8100 IE
  • Vitamin B1 2,5 mg
  • Vitamin B2 1,6 mg
  • Vitamin B5 (Pantothensäure) 4,0 mg
  • Vitamin B7 (Biotin) 64,0 mcg
  • Vitamin B12 17,5 mcg
  • Vitamin D3 300 IE
  • Vitamin E 18,9 mg
  • Eisen (Eisen-II-Sulfat Monohydrat) 27,5 mg
  • Kupfer (Kupfer-II-Sulfat Pentahydrat) 3,0 mg
  • Zink (Zinksulfat Monohydrat) 17,0 mg
  • Mangan (Mangan-II-Oxid) 2,4 mg
  • Jod (Calciumjodat) 0,64 mg
  • Selen (Natriumselenit) 0,05 mg
  • Cholin (Cholinchlorid) 380 mg
  • Kieselsäure 150 mg

High confidence: full analysis plus minerals or omegas and declared energy.

This measures agreement with published reference ranges, not suitability for an individual dog. For medical conditions, follow veterinary guidance.

Transparency: what the label discloses

How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.

ItemPoints
✓ Ingredient list on the label (mandatory)10/10
✓ Printed percentages on the label (95% of the recipe mass) (voluntary)19/20
✓ Analytical constituents declared (mandatory)15/15
✓ Additives declared (mandatory)5/10
✓ Energy value declared (voluntary)5/5
✓ Complete/complementary designation (mandatory)5/5
✓ Feeding guidance given (mandatory)10/10
✓ Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory)5/10
✓ Country of manufacture stated (voluntary)10/10
✗ Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file0/5

Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Batch and date labelling).

Safety: recall history

Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.

No recalls recorded in our database.

Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it

The claims made on the pack and product page, checked against the declared label. We record claims as stated; "consistent" means our stored label data supports the claim, "contradicted" means it conflicts with it. Functional claims are recorded but never scored.

100/100 · moderate — 2 checkable claims: 2 consistent, 0 contradicted.

Consistent with the label

  • "Monoprotein" — supported by the declared single protein data.
  • "Getreidefrei" — supported by the declared grain-free data.

13 further claims on file that we cannot check against the label.

Moderate: every checkable claim is consistent with the declared label.

ClaimTypeCheckSubstantiation
Pferdefleisch gilt als extrem allergiearm und wird von fast allen Hunden vertragen (on page)Functionalnot checkableManufacturer assertion
Low-Glycemic: Süßkartoffeln liefern langanhaltende Energie, ohne den Blutzuckerspiegel unnötig zu belasten (on page)Functionalnot checkableManufacturer assertion
Purinarm: Da Pferdefleisch von Natur aus purinärmer ist als viele Innereien-Mixe, eignet sich dieses Menü hervorragend für eine bewusste und reizarme Ernährung (on page)Functionalnot checkableManufacturer assertion
80% geringerer CO2 Fußabdruck als Dosen oder Glas (on pack)Functionalnot checkableManufacturer assertion
Ohne Konservierungsstoffe (on pack)Free-fromnot checkableManufacturer assertion
Hypoallergen (on pack)Contentnot checkableManufacturer assertion
Ohne Farbstoffe (on pack)Free-fromnot checkableManufacturer assertion
Besteht zu 67% aus nachwachsenden Rohstoffen (on pack)Contentnot checkableManufacturer assertion
Bisphenol A (BPA) - frei (on pack)Free-fromnot checkableManufacturer assertion
Monoprotein (on pack)ContentconsistentManufacturer assertion
Keine Schlachtabfälle (on pack)Free-fromnot checkableManufacturer assertion
Ohne Geschmacksverstärker (on pack)Free-fromnot checkableManufacturer assertion
Getreidefrei (on pack)Free-fromconsistentManufacturer assertion
Alleinfutter für ausgewachsene Hunde (on pack)Contentnot checkableManufacturer assertion
Kein zugesetzter Zucker (on pack)Free-fromnot checkableManufacturer assertion

The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.

Alternatives to Pferd mit Süßkartoffeln

Similar on ingredients, protein, format or nutrition, using the same stored data.

See all alternatives

See all products from Fredfelia

Community0 comments

Owners’ verdict
0 votes

Comments (0)

No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.

Comments are reviewed before they appear.