Our verdict
Is Fredfelia Huhn mit Reis a good dog food?
We score it 73/100 (Good). This reflects the ingredient quality, composition and label transparency of the recipe as declared on the label.
Who is this food for?
Suits
- Labelled by the manufacturer for adult dogs
- Single named protein: chicken
- Doesn't list beef, turkey, lamb, fish, venison, pork, duck as ingredients
Consider something else if:
- Your dog avoids grain: the label lists rice - white
- You are limiting fat: 24.0% on a dry-matter basis is in the high band
These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Find foods that fit your dog.
Ingredients (11)3% of the recipe is estimated
Estimated composition
- meat 50.0%
- other 19.0%
- carb 17.0%
- veg 11.0%
- oil 2.2%
- supplement 0.8%
| # | As declared | Matched | Label reading | Declared % | Est. % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 40% Muscle Meat | Muscle Meat | meat · good | 40 | 40.0 |
| 2 | 10% Hearts | Chicken Heart | meat · good | 10 | 10.0 |
| 3 | Water (19%) | Water | other | 19 | 19.0 |
| 4 | Rice (9%) | Rice - white | carb · medium | 9 | 9.0 |
| 5 | Sweet Potatoes (8%) | Sweet Potatoes | carb · good | 8 | 8.0 |
| 6 | Peas (4%) | Peas | veg · good | 4 | 4.0 |
| 7 | Parsnips (4%) | Parsnips | veg · good | 4 | 4.0 |
| 8 | Apple (3%) | Apples | veg · good | 3 | 3.0 |
| 9 | Safflower Oil | Safflower Oil | oil · good | - | 1.2 |
| 10 | Linseed Oil | Linseed oil | oil · good | - | 1.0 |
| 11 | Minerals | Vitamins and minerals | supplement · medium | - | 0.8 |
- 1. 40% Muscle Meat40% declared40.0% estimated
- 2. 10% Hearts10% declared10.0% estimated
- 3. Water (19%)19% declared19.0% estimated
- 4. Rice (9%)9% declared9.0% estimated
- 5. Sweet Potatoes (8%)8% declared8.0% estimated
- 6. Peas (4%)4% declared4.0% estimated
- 7. Parsnips (4%)4% declared4.0% estimated
- 8. Apple (3%)3% declared3.0% estimated
- 9. Safflower Oil1.2% estimated
- 10. Linseed Oil1.0% estimated
- 11. Minerals0.8% estimated
Nutrition and feedingProtein 9.80% · Fat 6.30%
Typical analysis (as fed)
| Nutrient | As fed |
|---|---|
| Protein | 9.80% |
| Fat | 6.30% |
| Fibre | 0.60% |
| Ash | 1.70% |
| Moisture | 73.80% |
| Calcium | 0.33% |
| Phosphorus | 0.17% |
Energy: 122 kcal/100g
Additives & feeding info
Feeding and storage
Storage
Trocken lagern, vor Wärme schützen. Nach dem Öffnen 2 Tage im Kühlschrank haltbar. Bei Zimmertemperatur füttern.
Feeding guide
Kleine Hunde (<15kg): ca. 40-70g pro Tag pro 1 kg Körpergewicht; Große Hunde (>15kg): ca. 30-40g pro Tag pro 1 kg Körpergewicht. Richtwerte; individueller Bedarf variiert je nach Alter, Rasse, Haltungsbedingungen und Aktivität.
Additives declared on the label
Nutritional additives
Vitamin A 6127 IE/kg; Vitamin B1 2.5 mg/kg; Vitamin B2 1.6 mg/kg; Vitamin B5 (Pantothensäure) 4.0 mg/kg; Vitamin B7 (Biotin) 64 mcg/kg; Vitamin B9 (Folsäure) 0.12 mg/kg; Vitamin B12 17.5 mcg/kg; Vitamin D3 300 IE/kg; Vitamin E 18.9 mg/kg; Eisen (Eisen-II-Sulfat Monohydrat) 27.5 mg/kg; Kupfer (Kupfer-II-Sulfat Pentahydrat) 3.0 mg/kg; Zink (Zinksulfat Monohydrat) 28 mg/kg; Mangan (Mangan-II-Oxid) 2.4 mg/kg; Jod (Calciumjodat) 0.63 mg/kg; Selen (Natriumselenit) 0.05 mg/kg; Cholin (Cholinchlorid) 380 mg/kg; Kieselsäure 150 mg/kg
Trust and sourceNo recalls recorded in our database · checked 2026-09-19
Brand and contact: Fredfelia
- Website
- https://www.fredfelia.com/
- [email protected]
- Phone
- +49 (0)951 / 912 790 79
Trust and provenance
- Recall history
- No recalls recorded in our database
- Label data last checked
- 2026-09-19
- Scored with
- Model v3 (methodology)
- Product page
- www.fredfelia.com
Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.
Brand and retailer reviews
External platform ratings are not scores for this individual recipe.
Trustpilot: 3.8/5 · 18 reviews
989 reviews on this product · 4.9/5
Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.
Score details and methodologyCalculations, history and evidence
Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated
Why this score?
This product scored 73 out of 100. The overall quality of the ingredient list contributed +6.8 points, while the meat content contributed +4.6 points. The carbohydrate content reduced the score by -3.9 points, and being labelled nutritionally complete contributed +2.3 points.
Scored with model v3 on 2026-10-25. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.7 | 9.191 | +6.84 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 47.6% | 0.096 | +4.57 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 33.7% | -0.115 | -3.88 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 7.4% | -0.092 | -0.68 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 5.6% | -0.005 | -0.03 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 2.5% | -0.012 | -0.03 |
| Other share of dry matter | 3.2% | -0.375 | -1.21 |
| Undeclared quantities | 3.0% | -0.106 | -0.32 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| High meat (30%+ of dry matter) | yes | 0.707 | +0.71 |
| Processing multiplier | 1.00 | 33.786 | +33.79 |
| Processing: Fresh Shelf | yes | -0.672 | -0.67 |
Show all 40 components
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.7 | 9.191 | +6.84 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 47.6% | 0.096 | +4.57 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 33.7% | -0.115 | -3.88 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 7.4% | -0.092 | -0.68 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 5.6% | -0.005 | -0.03 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 0.0% | 0.163 | +0.00 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 2.5% | -0.012 | -0.03 |
| Other share of dry matter | 3.2% | -0.375 | -1.21 |
| Unrecognised share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.027 | +0.00 |
| Recipe graded poor | 0.0% | -0.065 | +0.00 |
| Poor-quality meat in recipe | 0.0% | -0.179 | +0.00 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 0 | -0.876 | +0.00 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 0.0% | 0.060 | +0.00 |
| Undeclared quantities | 3.0% | -0.106 | -0.32 |
| Prints ingredient percentages | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| Frozen or chilled fresh | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| High meat (30%+ of dry matter) | yes | 0.707 | +0.71 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | no | -3.158 | +0.00 |
| High carb and low meat | no | -1.180 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × printed percentages | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × fresh | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Fresh × high meat | 0.0 | 11.084 | +0.00 |
| Additive penalty | 0.00 | 0.222 | +0.00 |
| Processing multiplier | 1.00 | 33.786 | +33.79 |
| Processing: Raw | no | -0.054 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Chilled | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Frozen | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Refrigerated | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Shelf | yes | -0.672 | -0.67 |
| Processing: Dry Freeze Dried | no | 6.629 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Air Dried | no | 6.331 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Cold Pressed | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Baked | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Semi Moist | no | -6.174 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Muesli | no | -10.146 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Pate | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Chunks | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
- Processing-type offset
- -0.08
- Additives declared on label
- +1 transparency bonus
- Subtotal
- 73.2
- Final score
- 73/100
Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.
Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges
How the declared analysis compares with FEDIAF reference ranges for adult dogs. The label prints as-fed values; we convert to a dry-matter basis before scoring, and the bands are dry-matter ranges. Scores rise to 100 at the band midpoint: the reference is adequacy, not maximisation. Nutrients with a published upper limit taper again above it; fat is policed through calorie density rather than a direct penalty.
| Nutrient | As fed (label) | Dry matter (scored) | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| Protein | 9.8 | 37.4 (band 20.954198473282435 to 40%) | 100 |
| Fat | 6.3 | 24 (band 6.402671755725189 to 20%) | 100 |
| Fibre | 0.6 | 2.3 (band 0.5 to 5%) | 93.9 |
| Calcium | 0.33 | 1.3 (band 0.5820610687022899 to 2.5%) | 91.2 |
| Phosphorus | 0.17 | 0.6 (band 0.46564885496183195 to 1.6%) | 79.7 |
| Calcium:phosphorus ratio | 1.9 | 1.9 (band 1 to 2%) | 100 |
| Energy (kcal/100g) | 122 | 465.6 | 100 |
Scored over 7 declared nutrients (combined weight 90); undeclared nutrients do not affect the score.
Declared fortification: 17 nutritional additives on the label
- Vitamin A 6127 IE/kg
- Vitamin B1 2.5 mg/kg
- Vitamin B2 1.6 mg/kg
- Vitamin B5 (Pantothensäure) 4.0 mg/kg
- Vitamin B7 (Biotin) 64 mcg/kg
- Vitamin B9 (Folsäure) 0.12 mg/kg
- Vitamin B12 17.5 mcg/kg
- Vitamin D3 300 IE/kg
- Vitamin E 18.9 mg/kg
- Eisen (Eisen-II-Sulfat Monohydrat) 27.5 mg/kg
- Kupfer (Kupfer-II-Sulfat Pentahydrat) 3.0 mg/kg
- Zink (Zinksulfat Monohydrat) 28 mg/kg
- Mangan (Mangan-II-Oxid) 2.4 mg/kg
- Jod (Calciumjodat) 0.63 mg/kg
- Selen (Natriumselenit) 0.05 mg/kg
- Cholin (Cholinchlorid) 380 mg/kg
- Kieselsäure 150 mg/kg
High confidence: full analysis plus minerals or omegas and declared energy.
This measures agreement with published reference ranges, not suitability for an individual dog. For medical conditions, follow veterinary guidance.
Transparency: what the label discloses
How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.
| Item | Points |
|---|---|
| Ingredient list on the label (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Printed percentages on the label (97% of the recipe mass) (voluntary) | 19.4/20 |
| Analytical constituents declared (mandatory) | 15/15 |
| Additives declared (mandatory) | 5/10 |
| Energy value declared (voluntary) | 5/5 |
| Complete/complementary designation (mandatory) | 5/5 |
| Feeding guidance given (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory) | 5/10 |
| Country of manufacture stated (voluntary) | 10/10 |
| Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file | 0/5 |
Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Batch and date labelling).
Safety: recall history
Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.
No recalls recorded in our database.
Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it
The claims made on the pack and product page, checked against the declared label. We record claims as stated; "consistent" means our stored label data supports the claim, "contradicted" means it conflicts with it. Functional claims are recorded but never scored.
100/100 · moderate — 2 checkable claims: 2 consistent, 0 contradicted.
Consistent with the label
- "Monoprotein" — supported by the declared single protein data.
- "Monoprotein-Rezeptur: Ausschließlich frisches Hühnerfleisch (Muskelfleisch & Herzen). Ideal für Allergiker und Hunde mit sensibler Verdauung." — supported by the declared single protein data.
11 further claims on file that we cannot check against the label.
Moderate: every checkable claim is consistent with the declared label.
| Claim | Type | Check | Substantiation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tierärztlich entwickelt: Gemeinsam mit Dr. med. vet. Susan Kröger formuliert, um eine optimale Nährstoffversorgung nach FEDIAF-Standards zu garantieren. (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| hypoallergenes Alleinfuttermittel (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Monoprotein (on pack) | Content | consistent | Manufacturer assertion |
| Ohne Konservierungsstoffe (on page) | Free-from | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Glutenfrei (on pack) | Free-from | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Kein zugesetzter Zucker (on page) | Free-from | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Grob gewolft & ehrlich: Bei uns siehst du, was im Napf landet. (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Keine Schlachtabfälle (on page) | Free-from | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Ohne Geschmacksverstärker (on page) | Free-from | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Ohne Farbstoffe (on page) | Free-from | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| 100% Lebensmittelqualität: Wir verwenden keine Schlachtabfälle. Alle Zutaten sind für den menschlichen Verzehr zugelassen. (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Monoprotein-Rezeptur: Ausschließlich frisches Hühnerfleisch (Muskelfleisch & Herzen). Ideal für Allergiker und Hunde mit sensibler Verdauung. (on page) | Content | consistent | Manufacturer assertion |
| 71 mg Harnsäure / 100 g Futter und entspricht einem niedrigen mittleren Puringehalt (on pack) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.
Alternatives to Huhn mit Reis
Similar on ingredients, protein, format or nutrition, using the same stored data.
Community0 comments
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.