Fellicita Huhn & Reis

Wet Pate · completeHigh meatClear label

Huhn & Reis
Good
our rating

Our verdict

Is Fellicita Huhn & Reis a good dog food?

We score it 73/100 (Good). This reflects the ingredient quality, composition and label transparency of the recipe as declared on the label.

How we score

29% of this recipe has no printed percentage. Estimated shares are model estimates, not label facts.

Why you might choose it

  • Meat makes up an estimated 70% of the dry matter (85% as fed).
  • Prints ingredient percentages on the label.
  • Single named animal protein: chicken.

Why you might not

We found no significant drawbacks in the data we hold for this product.

Who is this food for?

Suits

  • Labelled by the manufacturer for adult dogs
  • Single named protein: chicken
  • Doesn't list beef, turkey, lamb, fish, venison, pork, duck as ingredients

Consider something else if:

  • Your dog avoids grain: the label lists rice - white

These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Find foods that fit your dog.

Ingredients (8)29% of the recipe is estimated

Estimated composition

  • meat 84.6%
  • unknown 9.4%
  • carb 5.0%
  • supplement 1.0%
#As declaredMatchedLabel readingDeclared %Est. %
115% Chicken HeartsChicken Heartmeat · good1515.0
215% Chicken MeatChickenmeat · medium1515.0
35% Chicken LiverChicken Livermeat · good55.0
415% Chicken GizzardsChicken Gizzardmeat · good1515.0
515% Chicken NecksNeckmeat · medium1515.0
6Chicken BrothChicken Brothmeat · medium-29.0
7Rice (5%)Rice - whitecarb · medium55.0
8Minerals (1%)Vitamins and mineralssupplement · medium11.0
  1. 1. 15% Chicken Hearts15% declared15.0% estimated
    Chicken Heart · meat · good
  2. 2. 15% Chicken Meat15% declared15.0% estimated
    Chicken · meat · medium
  3. 3. 5% Chicken Liver5% declared5.0% estimated
    Chicken Liver · meat · good
  4. 4. 15% Chicken Gizzards15% declared15.0% estimated
    Chicken Gizzard · meat · good
  5. 5. 15% Chicken Necks15% declared15.0% estimated
    Neck · meat · medium
  6. 6. Chicken Broth29.0% estimated
    Chicken Broth · meat · medium
  7. 7. Rice (5%)5% declared5.0% estimated
    Rice - white · carb · medium
  8. 8. Minerals (1%)1% declared1.0% estimated
    Vitamins and minerals · supplement · medium

Nutrition and feedingProtein 10.80% · Fat 6.20%

Declared analysis (as fed)

NutrientAs fed
Protein10.80%
Fat6.20%
Fibre0.50%
Ash2.50%
Moisture75%

Additives & feeding info

Feeding and storage

Storage

Die Konservierung erfolgt durch Erhitzung in der verschlossenen Dose; servieren Sie es Ihrem Hund nicht direkt aus dem Kühlschrank, sondern immer zimmerwarm.

Feeding guide

3 kg: 160-200 g/Tag; 5 kg: 220-300 g; 10 kg: 380-510 g; 15 kg: 500-680 g; 20 kg: 630-840 g; 25 kg: 730-1000 g; 30 kg: 830-1150 g; 35 kg: 930-1300 g. Auf mindestens zwei Mahlzeiten am Tag verteilen.

Additives declared on the label

Nutritional additives

Vitamin D3 (3a671) 200 I.E.; Vitamin E (als all rac-alfa-Tocopherylacetat) 30,00 mg; Zink (3b603) 15,00 mg; Mangan (3b503) 3,00 mg; Jod (3b202) 0,75 mg

Trust and sourceNo recalls recorded in our database · checked 2026-09-19

Brand and contact: Fellicita
Phone
081519659690
Address
Fellicita GmbH, Lärchenweg 15, 82319 Starnberg, Deutschland
Contact page
www.fellicita.de

Trust and provenance

Recall history
No recalls recorded in our database
Label data last checked
2026-09-19
Scored with
Model v3 (methodology)
Product page
www.fellicita.de

Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.

External platform ratings are not scores for this individual recipe.

Trustpilot: 3.7/5 · 1 reviews

Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.

Score details and methodologyCalculations, history and evidence

Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated

Why this score?

The overall score is 73 out of 100. The meat content contributed +5.2 points, while the overall quality of the ingredient list added a further +4.5 points. On the other hand, ingredients without printed percentages cost the product -3.1 points. Finally, being labelled nutritionally complete lifted the score by +2.3 points.

Scored with model v3 on 2026-10-25. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.

ComponentInputCoefficientContribution
Base score-30.909+30.91
Average ingredient quality0.59.191+4.45
Meat share of dry matter54.0%0.096+5.18
Carb share of dry matter13.1%-0.115-1.50
Supplement share of dry matter2.7%-0.012-0.03
Unrecognised share of dry matter14.0%-0.027-0.37
Undeclared quantities29.0%-0.106-3.06
Complete dietyes2.294+2.29
High meat (30%+ of dry matter)yes0.707+0.71
Processing multiplier1.0033.786+33.79
Processing: Wet Pateyes-0.672-0.67
Show all 40 components
ComponentInputCoefficientContribution
Base score-30.909+30.91
Average ingredient quality0.59.191+4.45
Meat share of dry matter54.0%0.096+5.18
Carb share of dry matter13.1%-0.115-1.50
Oil share of dry matter0.0%-0.092+0.00
Vegetable share of dry matter0.0%-0.005+0.00
Additive share of dry matter0.0%0.163+0.00
Supplement share of dry matter2.7%-0.012-0.03
Other share of dry matter0.0%-0.375+0.00
Unrecognised share of dry matter14.0%-0.027-0.37
Recipe graded poor0.0%-0.065+0.00
Poor-quality meat in recipe0.0%-0.179+0.00
Number of poor ingredients0-0.876+0.00
Largest single poor ingredient0.0%0.060+0.00
Undeclared quantities29.0%-0.106-3.06
Prints ingredient percentagesno0.000+0.00
Complete dietyes2.294+2.29
Frozen or chilled freshno0.000+0.00
High meat (30%+ of dry matter)yes0.707+0.71
Low meat (under 10% of dry matter)no-3.158+0.00
High carb and low meatno-1.180+0.00
Meat share × printed percentages0.00.000+0.00
Meat share × fresh0.00.000+0.00
Fresh × high meat0.011.084+0.00
Additive penalty0.000.222+0.00
Processing multiplier1.0033.786+33.79
Processing: Rawno-0.054+0.00
Processing: Fresh Chilledno-2.354+0.00
Processing: Fresh Frozenno-2.354+0.00
Processing: Fresh Refrigeratedno0.000+0.00
Processing: Fresh Shelfno-0.672+0.00
Processing: Dry Freeze Driedno6.629+0.00
Processing: Dry Air Driedno6.331+0.00
Processing: Dry Cold Pressedno-6.713+0.00
Processing: Dry Bakedno-6.713+0.00
Processing: Dry Extrudedno-6.713+0.00
Processing: Dry Semi Moistno-6.174+0.00
Processing: Dry Mueslino-10.146+0.00
Processing: Wet Pateyes-0.672-0.67
Processing: Wet Chunksno-0.672+0.00
Processing-type offset
-0.08
Additives declared on label
+1 transparency bonus
Subtotal
72.6
Final score
73/100

Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.

Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges

How the declared analysis compares with FEDIAF reference ranges for adult dogs. The label prints as-fed values; we convert to a dry-matter basis before scoring, and the bands are dry-matter ranges. Scores rise to 100 at the band midpoint: the reference is adequacy, not maximisation. Nutrients with a published upper limit taper again above it; fat is policed through calorie density rather than a direct penalty.

NutrientAs fed (label)Dry matter (scored)Score
Protein10.843.2 (band 18 to 40%)100
Fat6.224.8 (band 5.5 to 20%)100
Fibre0.52 (band 0.5 to 5%)90

Scored over 3 declared nutrients (combined weight 50); undeclared nutrients do not affect the score.

Declared fortification: 5 nutritional additives on the label
  • Vitamin D3 (3a671) 200 I.E.
  • Vitamin E (als all rac-alfa-Tocopherylacetat) 30,00 mg
  • Zink (3b603) 15,00 mg
  • Mangan (3b503) 3,00 mg
  • Jod (3b202) 0,75 mg

Medium confidence: the full five-part analysis is on file; where moisture was not declared it was estimated from the food type.

This measures agreement with published reference ranges, not suitability for an individual dog. For medical conditions, follow veterinary guidance.

Transparency: what the label discloses

How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.

ItemPoints
✓ Ingredient list on the label (mandatory)10/10
✓ Printed percentages on the label (71% of the recipe mass) (voluntary)14.2/20
✓ Analytical constituents declared (mandatory)15/15
✓ Additives declared (mandatory)5/10
✗ Energy value declared (voluntary) - not on file0/5
✓ Complete/complementary designation (mandatory)5/5
✓ Feeding guidance given (mandatory)10/10
✓ Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory)10/10
✓ Country of manufacture stated (voluntary)10/10
✗ Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file0/5

Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Batch and date labelling).

Safety: recall history

Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.

No recalls recorded in our database.

Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it

The claims made on the pack and product page, checked against the declared label. We record claims as stated; "consistent" means our stored label data supports the claim, "contradicted" means it conflicts with it. Functional claims are recorded but never scored.

100/100 · moderate — 1 checkable claim: 1 consistent, 0 contradicted.

Consistent with the label

  • "Monoprotein – nur eine Fleischsorte" — supported by the declared single protein data.

6 further claims on file that we cannot check against the label.

Moderate: every checkable claim is consistent with the declared label.

ClaimTypeCheckSubstantiation
Ausgewogenes Calcium-Phosphor-Verhältnis (on pack)Functionalnot checkableManufacturer assertion
Ideale Nährstoffversorgung für erwachsene Hunde (on pack)Functionalnot checkableManufacturer assertion
Rezepturen nach FEDIAF-Standards konzipiert (on page)Functionalnot checkableManufacturer assertion
Alleinfuttermittel für ausgewachsene Hunde (on pack)Contentnot checkableManufacturer assertion
Monoprotein – nur eine Fleischsorte (on pack)ContentconsistentManufacturer assertion
Ohne künstliche Aroma-, Farb- und Konservierungsstoffe (on pack)Free-fromnot checkableManufacturer assertion
Glutenfrei (on pack)Free-fromnot checkableManufacturer assertion

The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.

Alternatives to Huhn & Reis

Similar on ingredients, protein, format or nutrition, using the same stored data.

See all alternatives

See all products from Fellicita

Community0 comments

Owners’ verdict
0 votes

Comments (0)

No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.

Comments are reviewed before they appear.