Escapure Pferd Premium Trockenfutter
Dry Baked · completeClear labelFull label
Our verdict
Is Escapure Pferd Premium Trockenfutter a good dog food?
We score it 61/100 (Average). This reflects the ingredient quality, composition and label transparency of the recipe as declared on the label.
Only part of the analytical constituents are declared, so the nutritional picture is incomplete.
Who is this food for?
Suits
- Labelled by the manufacturer for adult dogs
- Grain-free: no grain ingredients listed
- Single named protein: horse
- Doesn't list chicken, beef, turkey, lamb, fish, venison, pork, duck as ingredients
These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Find foods that fit your dog.
Ingredients (8)8 of 8 percentages printed
Estimated composition
- carb 63.3%
- meat 26.5%
- oil 5.5%
- unknown 4.5%
- supplement 0.2%
| # | As declared | Matched | Label reading | Declared % | Est. % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Horse Meat (corresponds to 62% before drying) 24% | Horse Meat | meat · good | 24 | 24.0 |
| 2 | Potato Flakes 52.3% | Potatoes | carb · medium | 52.3 | 52.3 |
| 3 | Potato Protein 7.5% | Potato protein | carb · medium | 7.5 | 7.5 |
| 4 | Rapeseed Oil 5.5% | Rapeseed oil | oil · good | 5.5 | 5.5 |
| 5 | Vegetable-Herb Mix 4.5% | Herbs | veg · medium | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| 6 | Amaranth 3.5% | Amaranth | carb · good | 3.5 | 3.5 |
| 7 | Whole Egg 2.5% | Egg | meat · good | 2.5 | 2.5 |
| 8 | Minerals 0.2% | Vitamins and minerals | supplement · medium | 0.2 | 0.2 |
- 1. Horse Meat (corresponds to 62% before drying) 24%24% declared24.0% estimated
- 2. Potato Flakes 52.3%52.3% declared52.3% estimated
- 3. Potato Protein 7.5%7.5% declared7.5% estimated
- 4. Rapeseed Oil 5.5%5.5% declared5.5% estimated
- 5. Vegetable-Herb Mix 4.5%4.5% declared4.5% estimated
- 6. Amaranth 3.5%3.5% declared3.5% estimated
- 7. Whole Egg 2.5%2.5% declared2.5% estimated
- 8. Minerals 0.2%0.2% declared0.2% estimated
Nutrition and feedingProtein 24% · Fat 11.20%
Declared analysis (as fed)
| Nutrient | As fed |
|---|---|
| Protein | 24% |
| Fat | 11.20% |
| Fibre | 2.50% |
| Ash | 9.70% |
| Calcium | 2.80% |
| Phosphorus | 1.50% |
Energy: 360 kcal/100g
Additives & feeding info
Feeding and storage
Storage
Kühl & trocken lagern.
Feeding guide
Trockenfutter pro Tag für einen erwachsenen, normalgewichtigen Hund: 5 kg = 110 g, 10 kg = 190 g, 15 kg = 255 g, 20 kg = 310 g, 30 kg = 420 g, 40 kg = 525 g, 50 kg = 620 g, 60 kg = 710 g. Stets frisches Trinkwasser bereitstellen.
Additives declared on the label
Nutritional additives
Vitamin A 12000 I.E.; Vitamin D3 1200 I.E.; Vitamin E 70 mg/kg; Vitamin B1 10 mg/kg; Vitamin B2 10 mg/kg; Vitamin B6 6 mg/kg; Vitamin B12 30 mcg/kg; Vitamin C 140 mg; Biotin 250 mcg/kg; Pantothensäure 8 mg; Niacin 40 mg/kg; Folsäure 2 mg/kg; Eisen 175 mg/kg; Zink 125 mg/kg; Kupfer 10 mg/kg; Mangan 20 mg/kg; Jod 2 mg/kg; Selen 0.3 mg/kg
Trust and sourceNo recalls recorded in our database · checked 2026-09-19
Brand and contact: Escapure
Trust and provenance
- Recall history
- No recalls recorded in our database
- Label data last checked
- 2026-09-19
- Scored with
- Model v3 (methodology)
- Product page
- escapure.de
Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.
Brand and retailer reviews
External platform ratings are not scores for this individual recipe.
Trustpilot: 2.9/5 · 13 reviews
Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.
Score details and methodologyCalculations, history and evidence
Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated
Why this score?
This food scores 61 out of 100. The processing format contributed -6.7 points and the carbohydrate content contributed -6.2 points, both of which pull the score down. Working the other way, the overall quality of the ingredient list added +6.1 points, and being labelled nutritionally complete added +2.3 points.
Scored with model v3 on 2026-10-25. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.7 | 9.191 | +6.11 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 22.3% | 0.096 | +2.14 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 54.1% | -0.115 | -6.22 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 16.3% | -0.092 | -1.50 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 0.6% | -0.012 | -0.01 |
| Unrecognised share of dry matter | 6.8% | -0.027 | -0.18 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| Processing multiplier | 0.98 | 33.786 | +33.11 |
| Processing: Dry Baked | yes | -6.713 | -6.71 |
Show all 40 components
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.7 | 9.191 | +6.11 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 22.3% | 0.096 | +2.14 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 54.1% | -0.115 | -6.22 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 16.3% | -0.092 | -1.50 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.005 | +0.00 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 0.0% | 0.163 | +0.00 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 0.6% | -0.012 | -0.01 |
| Other share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.375 | +0.00 |
| Unrecognised share of dry matter | 6.8% | -0.027 | -0.18 |
| Recipe graded poor | 0.0% | -0.065 | +0.00 |
| Poor-quality meat in recipe | 0.0% | -0.179 | +0.00 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 0 | -0.876 | +0.00 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 0.0% | 0.060 | +0.00 |
| Undeclared quantities | 0.0% | -0.106 | +0.00 |
| Prints ingredient percentages | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| Frozen or chilled fresh | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| High meat (30%+ of dry matter) | no | 0.707 | +0.00 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | no | -3.158 | +0.00 |
| High carb and low meat | no | -1.180 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × printed percentages | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × fresh | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Fresh × high meat | 0.0 | 11.084 | +0.00 |
| Additive penalty | 0.00 | 0.222 | +0.00 |
| Processing multiplier | 0.98 | 33.786 | +33.11 |
| Processing: Raw | no | -0.054 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Chilled | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Frozen | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Refrigerated | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Shelf | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Freeze Dried | no | 6.629 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Air Dried | no | 6.331 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Cold Pressed | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Baked | yes | -6.713 | -6.71 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Semi Moist | no | -6.174 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Muesli | no | -10.146 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Pate | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Chunks | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
- Processing-type offset
- +0.02
- Additives declared on label
- +1 transparency bonus
- Subtotal
- 61.0
- Final score
- 61/100
Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.
Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges
How the declared analysis compares with FEDIAF reference ranges for adult dogs. The label prints as-fed values; we convert to a dry-matter basis before scoring, and the bands are dry-matter ranges. Scores rise to 100 at the band midpoint: the reference is adequacy, not maximisation. Nutrients with a published upper limit taper again above it; fat is policed through calorie density rather than a direct penalty.
| Nutrient | As fed (label) | Dry matter (scored) | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| Protein | 24 | 27.3 (band 18.40909090909091 to 40%) | 94.6 |
| Fat | 11.2 | 12.7 (band 5.625 to 20%) | 99.6 |
| Fibre | 2.5 | 2.8 (band 0.5 to 5%) | 100 |
| Calcium | 2.8 | 3.2 (band 0.5113636363636364 to 2.5%) | 72.7 |
| Phosphorus | 1.5 | 1.7 (band 0.4090909090909091 to 1.6%) | 93.5 |
| Calcium:phosphorus ratio | 1.9 | 1.9 (band 1 to 2%) | 100 |
| Energy (kcal/100g) | 360 | 409.1 | 100 |
Scored over 7 declared nutrients (combined weight 90); undeclared nutrients do not affect the score. Moisture was not declared and was estimated at 12% from the food type.
Declared fortification: 18 nutritional additives on the label
- Vitamin A 12000 I.E.
- Vitamin D3 1200 I.E.
- Vitamin E 70 mg/kg
- Vitamin B1 10 mg/kg
- Vitamin B2 10 mg/kg
- Vitamin B6 6 mg/kg
- Vitamin B12 30 mcg/kg
- Vitamin C 140 mg
- Biotin 250 mcg/kg
- Pantothensäure 8 mg
- Niacin 40 mg/kg
- Folsäure 2 mg/kg
- Eisen 175 mg/kg
- Zink 125 mg/kg
- Kupfer 10 mg/kg
- Mangan 20 mg/kg
- Jod 2 mg/kg
- Selen 0.3 mg/kg
Medium confidence: the full five-part analysis is on file; where moisture was not declared it was estimated from the food type.
This measures agreement with published reference ranges, not suitability for an individual dog. For medical conditions, follow veterinary guidance.
Transparency: what the label discloses
How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.
| Item | Points |
|---|---|
| Ingredient list on the label (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Printed percentages on the label (100% of the recipe mass) (voluntary) | 20/20 |
| Analytical constituents declared (mandatory) - not on file | 0/15 |
| Additives declared (mandatory) | 5/10 |
| Energy value declared (voluntary) | 5/5 |
| Complete/complementary designation (mandatory) | 5/5 |
| Feeding guidance given (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory) | 5/10 |
| Country of manufacture stated (voluntary) | 10/10 |
| Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file | 0/5 |
Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Analytical constituents declared, Batch and date labelling).
Safety: recall history
Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.
No recalls recorded in our database.
Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it
The claims made on the pack and product page, checked against the declared label. We record claims as stated; "consistent" means our stored label data supports the claim, "contradicted" means it conflicts with it. Functional claims are recorded but never scored.
100/100 · moderate — 2 checkable claims: 2 consistent, 0 contradicted.
Consistent with the label
- "Frei von Getreide – auch bei Unverträglichkeiten" — supported by the declared grain-free data.
- "Monoprotein-Rezeptur (nur eine Fleischquelle)" — supported by the declared single protein data.
7 further claims on file that we cannot check against the label.
Moderate: every checkable claim is consistent with the declared label.
| Claim | Type | Check | Substantiation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mit Rapsöl – für glänzendes Fell (on pack) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Frei von Getreide – auch bei Unverträglichkeiten (on pack) | Free-from | consistent | Manufacturer assertion |
| Alleinfuttermittel (on pack) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Produziert im Lebensmittelstandard (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| BIO-Amaranth – hochwertige, glutenfreie Energiequelle (on pack) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Reines Pferdefleisch – schonend verarbeitet (on pack) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| 30 Tage Verträglichkeitsgarantie (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| 100% natürliche Rohstoffe (on pack) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Monoprotein-Rezeptur (nur eine Fleischquelle) (on page) | Content | consistent | Manufacturer assertion |
The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.
Alternatives to Pferd Premium Trockenfutter
Similar on ingredients, protein, format or nutrition, using the same stored data.
Community0 comments
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.