Our verdict
Is Escapure Lamm Gröstl a good dog food?
We score it 61/100 (Average). This reflects the ingredient quality, composition and label transparency of the recipe as declared on the label.
Who is this food for?
Suits
- Labelled by the manufacturer for all lifestages
- Single named protein: lamb
- Doesn't list chicken, beef, turkey, fish, venison, pork, duck as ingredients
Consider something else if:
- Your dog avoids grain: the label lists rice - white
These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Find foods that fit your dog.
Ingredients (13)0% of the recipe is estimated
Estimated composition
- unknown 87.3%
- carb 8.0%
- veg 3.0%
- meat 0.5%
- oil 0.5%
- mineral 0.5%
- supplement 0.2%
| # | As declared | Matched | Label reading | Declared % | Est. % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 40.76% Lamb | Lamb | meat · medium | 40.76 | 40.8 |
| 2 | 40.74% Lamb Hearts | Lamb Hearts | meat · good | 40.74 | 40.7 |
| 3 | 5% Lamb Liver and Lamb Lung | Liver | meat · good | 5 | 5.0 |
| 4 | Rice (8.0%) | Rice - white | carb · medium | 8 | 8.0 |
| 5 | Apple (1.0%) | Apples | veg · good | 1 | 1.0 |
| 6 | Linseed (1.0%) | Linseed | veg · good | 1 | 1.0 |
| 7 | Seaweed (1.0%) | Seaweed | veg · good | 1 | 1.0 |
| 8 | Psyllium Husk (0.8%) | Psyllium fibre | fibre · good | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| 9 | Cottage Cheese (0.5%) | Cottage Cheese | meat · good | 0.5 | 0.5 |
| 10 | Sunflower Oil (0.5%) | Sunflower oil | oil · good | 0.5 | 0.5 |
| 11 | Sea Salt (0.5%) | Sea Salt | mineral · medium | 0.5 | 0.5 |
| 12 | Brewer's Yeast (0.1%) | Brewer's Yeast | supplement · good | 0.1 | 0.1 |
| 13 | Minerals (0.1%) | Vitamins and minerals | supplement · medium | 0.1 | 0.1 |
- 1. 40.76% Lamb40.76% declared40.8% estimated
- 2. 40.74% Lamb Hearts40.74% declared40.7% estimated
- 3. 5% Lamb Liver and Lamb Lung5% declared5.0% estimated
- 4. Rice (8.0%)8% declared8.0% estimated
- 5. Apple (1.0%)1% declared1.0% estimated
- 6. Linseed (1.0%)1% declared1.0% estimated
- 7. Seaweed (1.0%)1% declared1.0% estimated
- 8. Psyllium Husk (0.8%)0.8% declared0.8% estimated
- 9. Cottage Cheese (0.5%)0.5% declared0.5% estimated
- 10. Sunflower Oil (0.5%)0.5% declared0.5% estimated
- 11. Sea Salt (0.5%)0.5% declared0.5% estimated
- 12. Brewer's Yeast (0.1%)0.1% declared0.1% estimated
- 13. Minerals (0.1%)0.1% declared0.1% estimated
Nutrition and feedingProtein 11.90% · Fat 5.60%
Declared analysis (as fed)
| Nutrient | As fed |
|---|---|
| Protein | 11.90% |
| Fat | 5.60% |
| Fibre | 2.90% |
| Ash | 1.20% |
| Moisture | 76.30% |
Energy: 119 kcal/100g
Additives & feeding info
Feeding and storage
Storage
Kühl & trocken lagern. Nach Öffnung innerhalb von 3 Tagen aufbrauchen (am besten mit Deckel im Kühlschrank lagern). Ungeöffnet bis zu 24 Monate haltbar.
Feeding guide
Empfohlene Futtermenge pro Tag für einen erwachsenen, normalgewichtigen Hund bei normaler Aktivität: 5 kg = 330 g, 10 kg = 550 g, 20 kg = 900 g, 30 kg = 1200 g.
Additives declared on the label
Nutritional additives
Zinksulfat, Monohydrat 21 mg; Kupfer-(II)-sulfat, Pentahydrat 2,69 mg; Mangan-(II)-oxid 1,7 mg; Calciumjodat, wasserfrei 0,45 mg; Eisen-(II)-sulfat, Monohydrat 11 mg; Natriumselenit 0,07 mg; Vitamin D3 202 IE; Vitamin E/all rac-alpha-Tocopherylacetat 20 mg; Vitamin B1/Thiaminmononitrat 2,64 mg
Trust and sourceNo recalls recorded in our database · checked 2026-09-19
Brand and contact: Escapure
Trust and provenance
- Recall history
- No recalls recorded in our database
- Label data last checked
- 2026-09-19
- Scored with
- Model v3 (methodology)
- Product page
- escapure.de
Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.
Brand and retailer reviews
External platform ratings are not scores for this individual recipe.
Trustpilot: 2.9/5 · 13 reviews
Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.
Score details and methodologyCalculations, history and evidence
Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated
Why this score?
The overall score is 61 out of 100. Being labelled nutritionally complete added +2.3 points, while ingredients we could not classify cost -2.1 points and the carbohydrate content cost -1.5 points. The overall quality of the ingredient list contributed +1.1 points.
Scored with model v3 on 2026-10-25. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.1 | 9.191 | +1.10 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 0.3% | 0.096 | +0.02 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 13.1% | -0.115 | -1.50 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 0.9% | -0.092 | -0.08 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 3.6% | -0.005 | -0.02 |
| Unrecognised share of dry matter | 80.9% | -0.027 | -2.15 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | yes | -3.158 | -3.16 |
| Processing multiplier | 1.00 | 33.786 | +33.79 |
| Processing: Wet Pate | yes | -0.672 | -0.67 |
Show all 40 components
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.1 | 9.191 | +1.10 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 0.3% | 0.096 | +0.02 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 13.1% | -0.115 | -1.50 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 0.9% | -0.092 | -0.08 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 3.6% | -0.005 | -0.02 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 0.0% | 0.163 | +0.00 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 0.3% | -0.012 | -0.00 |
| Other share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.375 | +0.00 |
| Unrecognised share of dry matter | 80.9% | -0.027 | -2.15 |
| Recipe graded poor | 0.0% | -0.065 | +0.00 |
| Poor-quality meat in recipe | 0.0% | -0.179 | +0.00 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 0 | -0.876 | +0.00 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 0.0% | 0.060 | +0.00 |
| Undeclared quantities | 0.0% | -0.106 | +0.00 |
| Prints ingredient percentages | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| Frozen or chilled fresh | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| High meat (30%+ of dry matter) | no | 0.707 | +0.00 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | yes | -3.158 | -3.16 |
| High carb and low meat | no | -1.180 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × printed percentages | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × fresh | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Fresh × high meat | 0.0 | 11.084 | +0.00 |
| Additive penalty | -0.01 | 0.222 | -0.00 |
| Processing multiplier | 1.00 | 33.786 | +33.79 |
| Processing: Raw | no | -0.054 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Chilled | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Frozen | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Refrigerated | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Shelf | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Freeze Dried | no | 6.629 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Air Dried | no | 6.331 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Cold Pressed | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Baked | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Semi Moist | no | -6.174 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Muesli | no | -10.146 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Pate | yes | -0.672 | -0.67 |
| Processing: Wet Chunks | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
- Processing-type offset
- -0.08
- Additives declared on label
- +1 transparency bonus
- Subtotal
- 61.5
- Final score
- 61/100
Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.
Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges
How the declared analysis compares with FEDIAF reference ranges for adult dogs. The label prints as-fed values; we convert to a dry-matter basis before scoring, and the bands are dry-matter ranges. Scores rise to 100 at the band midpoint: the reference is adequacy, not maximisation. Nutrients with a published upper limit taper again above it; fat is policed through calorie density rather than a direct penalty.
| Nutrient | As fed (label) | Dry matter (scored) | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| Protein | 11.9 | 50.2 (band 22.594936708860754 to 40%) | 100 |
| Fat | 5.6 | 23.6 (band 6.904008438818564 to 20%) | 100 |
| Fibre | 2.9 | 12.2 (band 0.5 to 5%) | 47 |
| Energy (kcal/100g) | 119 | 502.1 | 100 |
Scored over 4 declared nutrients (combined weight 60); undeclared nutrients do not affect the score.
Declared fortification: 9 nutritional additives on the label
- Zinksulfat, Monohydrat 21 mg
- Kupfer-(II)-sulfat, Pentahydrat 2,69 mg
- Mangan-(II)-oxid 1,7 mg
- Calciumjodat, wasserfrei 0,45 mg
- Eisen-(II)-sulfat, Monohydrat 11 mg
- Natriumselenit 0,07 mg
- Vitamin D3 202 IE
- Vitamin E/all rac-alpha-Tocopherylacetat 20 mg
- Vitamin B1/Thiaminmononitrat 2,64 mg
Medium confidence: the full five-part analysis is on file; where moisture was not declared it was estimated from the food type.
This measures agreement with published reference ranges, not suitability for an individual dog. For medical conditions, follow veterinary guidance.
Transparency: what the label discloses
How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.
| Item | Points |
|---|---|
| Ingredient list on the label (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Printed percentages on the label (100% of the recipe mass) (voluntary) | 20/20 |
| Analytical constituents declared (mandatory) | 15/15 |
| Additives declared (mandatory) | 5/10 |
| Energy value declared (voluntary) | 5/5 |
| Complete/complementary designation (mandatory) | 5/5 |
| Feeding guidance given (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory) | 5/10 |
| Country of manufacture stated (voluntary) | 10/10 |
| Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file | 0/5 |
Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Batch and date labelling).
Safety: recall history
Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.
No recalls recorded in our database.
Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it
The claims made on the pack and product page, checked against the declared label. We record claims as stated; "consistent" means our stored label data supports the claim, "contradicted" means it conflicts with it. Functional claims are recorded but never scored.
0/100 · limited — 1 checkable claim: 0 consistent, 1 contradicted.
Contradicted by the label
- "Frei von Getreide" — the declared label says otherwise on grain-free.
8 further claims on file that we cannot check against the label.
Limited: at least one claim contradicts the declared label, or a recent upheld ASA ruling applies.
| Claim | Type | Check | Substantiation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Unterstützt Verdauung mit Leinsamen & Flohsamenschalen (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Für Hunde jeden Alters geeignet (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Frei von Getreide (on page) | Free-from | contradicted | Manufacturer assertion |
| 100% natürliche Rohstoffe (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Produziert im Lebensmittelstandard (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| 86,5% Lammfleisch, Reis & Apfel – Vollwertige Mahlzeit für deinen Hund (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Alleinfuttermittel (on pack) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| 86,5% Lammfleisch – Natürliche Energiequelle (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Ohne künstliche Zusätze für beste Verträglichkeit (on page) | Free-from | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.
Alternatives to Lamm Gröstl
Similar on ingredients, protein, format or nutrition, using the same stored data.
Community0 comments
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.