Bubeck Pferd mit Kartoffel Nassfutter

Wet Pate complete High meat Clear label

Pferd mit Kartoffel Nassfutter
Good
our rating

Is Bubeck Pferd mit Kartoffel Nassfutter a good dog food?

We score it 74/100 (Good). This reflects the ingredient quality, composition and label transparency of the recipe as declared on the label.

How we score

Why this score?

The overall score is 74 out of 100. The overall quality of the ingredient list contributed +5.1 points, and the meat content contributed +4.5 points. Ingredients without printed percentages reduced the score by -2.7, while being labelled nutritionally complete added +2.3 points.

25% of this recipe has no printed percentage. Estimated shares are model estimates, not label facts.

The Recipe score measures how attractive and transparent the declared ingredient list is. It is not, by itself, proof that the food is nutritionally appropriate for long-term feeding. The Nutritional and Evidence scores measure what we can verify towards that stronger claim.

Why you might choose it

  • Meat makes up an estimated 47% of the dry matter (60% as fed).
  • Prints ingredient percentages on the label.
  • Single named animal protein: horse.

Why you might not

  • Around 23% of the recipe is generic or unspecified ingredients.
  • High in fat: 28% fat on a dry-matter basis.

View the source page

Estimated composition

meat60.0%
unknown16.2%
carb9.8%
veg6.0%
supplement4.5%
additive3.1%
oil0.3%
fibre0.1%

Typical analysis (as fed)

Protein
9.50%
Fat
7%
Fibre
0.80%
Ash
2.50%
Moisture
75%
Calcium
0.45%
Phosphorus
0.33%

Additives & feeding info

Nutritional additives

Vitamin D3 150 I.E./kg; Vitamin E 30 mg/kg; Kupfer (aus Kupfer(II)-Sulfat-Pentahydrat) 2 mg/kg; Selen (aus Natriumselenit) 0,1 mg/kg; Zink (aus Aminosäuren-Zinkchelat, Hydrat) 39 mg/kg; Jod (aus Calciumjodat, wasserfrei) 1 mg/kg

Storage

Die geöffnete Packung im Kühlschrank kühlen und zeitnah verzehren. Nur zimmerwarm füttern.

Feeding guide

Pro 5 kg Körpergewicht ca. 150 bis 250g pro Tag für einen normal aktiven erwachsenen Hund. Genaue Fütterungsempfehlung auf der Packung.

Reviews

Trustpilot: 3.4/5 · 10 reviews

Who is this food for?

Suits

  • Labelled by the manufacturer for adult dogs
  • Grain-free: no grain ingredients listed
  • Single named protein: horse
  • Doesn't list chicken, beef, turkey, lamb, fish, venison, pork, duck as ingredients

Consider something else if:

  • You are limiting fat: 28.0% on a dry-matter basis is in the high band

These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Use the homepage filter to find foods that fit your dog.

Ingredients (14)

#As declaredMatchedCategoryTierDeclared %Est. %
1Horse Meat (60%)Horse Meatmeatgood6060.0
2Horse BrothCooking brothothermedium-5.3
3Potato (5%)Potatoescarbmedium55.0
4Carrot (4%)Carrotsveggood44.0
5Pea Protein Isolate (3%)Pea proteincarbmedium33.0
6Parsnip (2%)Parsnipsveggood22.0
7TapiocaTapiocacarbmedium-4.8
8Potato FibrePotatoescarbmedium-4.4
9Brewer's Yeast (0.5%)Brewer's Yeastsupplementgood0.50.5
10Hemp Oil (0.3%)Hemp Oiloilgood0.30.3
11Potassium ChloridePotassium Chloridesupplementmedium-4.0
12Carrot JuiceCarrotsveggood-3.5
13Psyllium Husks (0.1%)Psylliumfibregood0.10.1
14Sodium ChlorideSaltadditivemedium-3.1

Brand

Trust and provenance

Recall history
No recalls recorded in our database
Label data last checked
2026-09-19
Scored with
Model v3 (methodology)

Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.

Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.

Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated

Scored with model v3 on 2026-09-26. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.

ComponentInputCoefficientContribution
Base score-30.909+30.91
Average ingredient quality0.69.191+5.08
Meat share of dry matter47.3%0.096+4.54
Carb share of dry matter6.9%-0.115-0.80
Oil share of dry matter0.8%-0.092-0.08
Vegetable share of dry matter2.5%-0.005-0.01
Additive share of dry matter7.8%0.163+1.27
Supplement share of dry matter11.6%-0.012-0.14
Unrecognised share of dry matter22.8%-0.027-0.60
Undeclared quantities25.1%-0.106-2.65
Complete dietyes2.294+2.29
High meat (30%+ of dry matter)yes0.707+0.71
Additive penalty-3.760.222-0.83
Processing multiplier1.0033.786+33.79
Processing: Wet Pateyes-0.672-0.67
Show all 40 components
ComponentInputCoefficientContribution
Base score-30.909+30.91
Average ingredient quality0.69.191+5.08
Meat share of dry matter47.3%0.096+4.54
Carb share of dry matter6.9%-0.115-0.80
Oil share of dry matter0.8%-0.092-0.08
Vegetable share of dry matter2.5%-0.005-0.01
Additive share of dry matter7.8%0.163+1.27
Supplement share of dry matter11.6%-0.012-0.14
Other share of dry matter0.0%-0.375+0.00
Unrecognised share of dry matter22.8%-0.027-0.60
Recipe graded poor0.0%-0.065+0.00
Poor-quality meat in recipe0.0%-0.179+0.00
Number of poor ingredients0-0.876+0.00
Largest single poor ingredient0.0%0.060+0.00
Undeclared quantities25.1%-0.106-2.65
Prints ingredient percentagesno0.000+0.00
Complete dietyes2.294+2.29
Frozen or chilled freshno0.000+0.00
High meat (30%+ of dry matter)yes0.707+0.71
Low meat (under 10% of dry matter)no-3.158+0.00
High carb and low meatno-1.180+0.00
Meat share × printed percentages0.00.000+0.00
Meat share × fresh0.00.000+0.00
Fresh × high meat0.011.084+0.00
Additive penalty-3.760.222-0.83
Processing multiplier1.0033.786+33.79
Processing: Rawno-0.054+0.00
Processing: Fresh Chilledno-2.354+0.00
Processing: Fresh Frozenno-2.354+0.00
Processing: Fresh Refrigeratedno0.000+0.00
Processing: Fresh Shelfno-0.672+0.00
Processing: Dry Freeze Driedno6.629+0.00
Processing: Dry Air Driedno6.331+0.00
Processing: Dry Cold Pressedno-6.713+0.00
Processing: Dry Bakedno-6.713+0.00
Processing: Dry Extrudedno-6.713+0.00
Processing: Dry Semi Moistno-6.174+0.00
Processing: Dry Mueslino-10.146+0.00
Processing: Wet Pateyes-0.672-0.67
Processing: Wet Chunksno-0.672+0.00
Processing-type offset
-0.08
Additives declared on label
+1 transparency bonus
Subtotal
73.7
Final score
74/100

Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.

Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges

How the declared analysis compares with FEDIAF reference ranges for adult dogs. The label prints as-fed values; we convert to a dry-matter basis before scoring, and the bands are dry-matter ranges. Scores rise to 100 at the band midpoint: the reference is adequacy, not maximisation. Nutrients with a published upper limit taper again above it; fat is policed through calorie density rather than a direct penalty.

NutrientAs fed (label)Dry matter (scored)Score
Protein9.538 (band 18 to 40%)100
Fat728 (band 5.5 to 20%)100
Fibre0.83.2 (band 0.5 to 5%)100
Calcium0.451.8 (band 0.5 to 2.5%)100
Phosphorus0.331.3 (band 0.4 to 1.6%)100
Calcium:phosphorus ratio1.41.4 (band 1 to 2%)91.8

Scored over 6 declared nutrients (combined weight 80); undeclared nutrients do not affect the score.

Medium confidence: the full five-part analysis is on file; where moisture was not declared it was estimated from the food type.

This measures agreement with published reference ranges, not suitability for an individual dog. For medical conditions, follow veterinary guidance.

Transparency: what the label discloses

How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.

ItemPoints
✓ Ingredient list on the label (mandatory)10/10
✓ Printed percentages on the label (74.9% of the recipe mass) (voluntary)15/20
✓ Analytical constituents declared (mandatory)15/15
✓ Additives declared (mandatory)5/10
✗ Energy value declared (voluntary) - not on file0/5
✓ Complete/complementary designation (mandatory)5/5
✓ Feeding guidance given (mandatory)10/10
✓ Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory)5/10
✓ Country of manufacture stated (voluntary)10/10
✗ Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file0/5

Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Batch and date labelling).

Safety: recall history

Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.

No recalls recorded in our database.

Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it

The claims made on the pack and product page, checked against the declared label. We record claims as stated; "consistent" means our stored label data supports the claim, "contradicted" means it conflicts with it. Functional claims are recorded but never scored.

100/100 · moderate — 2 checkable claims: 2 consistent, 0 contradicted.

Consistent with the label

  • "getreidefreies Alleinfuttermittel" — supported by the declared grain-free data.
  • "Single-Protein-Menü" — supported by the declared single protein data.

4 further claims on file that we cannot check against the label.

Moderate: every checkable claim is consistent with the declared label.

ClaimTypeCheckSubstantiation
besonders bekömmlich für sensible Hunde, kleine Rassen oder ältere Vierbeiner (on page)Functionalnot checkableManufacturer assertion
90% weniger Müll als bei herkömmlichen Dosen (on page)Functionalnot checkableManufacturer assertion
getreidefreies Alleinfuttermittel (on page)Free-fromconsistentManufacturer assertion
Vollständig recycelbar (on page)Contentnot checkableManufacturer assertion
Single-Protein-Menü (on page)ContentconsistentManufacturer assertion
schonend dampfgegart im nachhaltigen Frische-Pouch (on page)Contentnot checkableManufacturer assertion

The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.

Other products from Bubeck

See all products from Bubeck

Alternatives to Pferd mit Kartoffel Nassfutter

Foods in our database that are similar on ingredients, protein, format or price. Scores and figures are from the same deterministic model used everywhere on the site.

See all alternatives

Community

Owners' verdict
0 votes

Comments (0)

No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.

Comments are reviewed before they appear.