Bubeck Ente No. 22 kleine Rassen getreidefrei

Dry Baked complete Clear label

Ente No. 22 kleine Rassen getreidefrei
Average
our rating

Is Bubeck Ente No. 22 kleine Rassen getreidefrei a good dog food?

We score it 51/100 (Average). This reflects the ingredient quality, composition and label transparency of the recipe as declared on the label.

How we score

Why this score?

The product scored 51 out of 100. Processing format contributed -6.7 points, and ingredients without printed percentages contributed -5 points. Being labelled nutritionally complete contributed +2.3 points, while the overall quality of the ingredient list contributed +2 points.

Only part of the analytical constituents are declared, so the nutritional picture is incomplete.

47% of this recipe has no printed percentage. Estimated shares are model estimates, not label facts.

The Recipe score measures how attractive and transparent the declared ingredient list is. It is not, by itself, proof that the food is nutritionally appropriate for long-term feeding. The Nutritional and Evidence scores measure what we can verify towards that stronger claim.

Why you might choose it

  • Prints ingredient percentages on the label.
  • Doesn't list grain ingredients.
  • Low in fat for its format: 9% fat on a dry-matter basis.

Why you might not

  • Around 71% of the recipe is generic or unspecified ingredients.
  • Low in protein: 19% protein on a dry-matter basis.
  • Meat makes up an estimated 7% of the dry matter (4% as fed); carbohydrates dominate.

View the source page

Estimated composition

unknown74.9%
veg10.3%
carb4.5%
meat4.0%
oil3.8%
supplement2.5%

Typical analysis (as fed)

Protein
19%
Fat
8.50%
Fibre
3%
Ash
6%
Calcium
1.50%
Phosphorus
1.20%

Energy: 338 kcal/100g

Additives & feeding info

Nutritional additives

Vitamin A 12.000 i. E./kg; Vitamin D3 1.200 i. E./kg; Vitamin E 70 mg/kg; Vitamin B1 10 mg/kg; Vitamin B2 10 mg/kg; Vitamin B6 6 mg/kg; Vitamin B12 30 mcg/kg; Niacin 40 mg/kg; Vitamin C 140 mg/kg; Pantothensäure als Calcium-D-Pantothenat 8 mg/kg; Biotin 250 mcg/kg; Folsäure 2 mg/kg; Eisen als Eisen-(II)-sulfat 175 mg/kg; Kupfer als Kupfer-(II)-Sulfat 10 mg/kg; Mangan als Mangan-(II)-oxid 20 mg/kg; Zink 125 mg/kg; Jod als Calciumjodat wasserfrei 2 mg/kg; Selen 0.3 mg/kg

Storage

Kühl und trocken lagern.

Feeding guide

Trocken füttern oder mit Wasser anfeuchten. Bis 2 kg: 60-70 g/Tag; bis 4 kg: 90-110 g/Tag; bis 6 kg: 130-150 g/Tag; bis 8 kg: 150-180 g/Tag. Richtwerte, abhängig von Haltungsbedingungen, Rasse, Aktivität und Alter. Frisches Trinkwasser bereithalten.

Reviews

Trustpilot: 3.4/5 · 10 reviews

8 reviews on this product · 4.9/5

Who is this food for?

Suits

  • Labelled by the manufacturer for adult dogs
  • Grain-free: no grain ingredients listed
  • Doesn't list chicken, beef, turkey, lamb, fish, venison, pork as ingredients

Consider something else if:

  • Your dog avoids duck: it is listed as an ingredient
  • You need more protein than this: 19.0% on a dry-matter basis is in the low band

These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Use the homepage filter to find foods that fit your dog.

Ingredients (16)

#As declaredMatchedCategoryTierDeclared %Est. %
126.5% Fresh MeatFresh Meatmeatmedium26.526.5
221.2% dried and groundBeetrootveggood21.221.2
35.3% Duck HeartsHeartmeatgood5.35.3
4Duck Liver and Duck LungLivermeatgood-4.7
5Potato FlourPotato Flourcarbmedium-4.5
6Potato FlakesPotatoescarbmedium-4.3
7Amaranth FlourAmaranthcarbgood-4.2
8Whole Egg PowderDried Whole Eggmeatgood-4.0
9Rapeseed OilRapeseed oiloilgood-3.8
10Apple (dried and ground)Applesveggood-3.6
11ParsleyParsleyveggood-3.4
12CarrotsCarrotsveggood-3.3
13ParsnipsParsnipsveggood-3.1
14Lovageunmatched---2.9
15RosemaryRosemaryveggood-2.7
16Dicalcium Phosphate.Dicalcium phosphatesupplementmedium-2.5

Brand

Trust and provenance

Recall history
No recalls recorded in our database
Label data last checked
2026-09-19
Scored with
Model v3 (methodology)

Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.

Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.

Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated

Scored with model v3 on 2026-09-26. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.

ComponentInputCoefficientContribution
Base score-30.909+30.91
Average ingredient quality0.29.191+1.99
Carb share of dry matter7.7%-0.115-0.89
Oil share of dry matter7.1%-0.092-0.66
Vegetable share of dry matter2.9%-0.005-0.02
Supplement share of dry matter4.4%-0.012-0.05
Unrecognised share of dry matter70.9%-0.027-1.88
Undeclared quantities47.0%-0.106-4.96
Complete dietyes2.294+2.29
Low meat (under 10% of dry matter)yes-3.158-3.16
Processing multiplier0.9833.786+33.11
Processing: Dry Bakedyes-6.713-6.71
Show all 40 components
ComponentInputCoefficientContribution
Base score-30.909+30.91
Average ingredient quality0.29.191+1.99
Meat share of dry matter0.0%0.096+0.00
Carb share of dry matter7.7%-0.115-0.89
Oil share of dry matter7.1%-0.092-0.66
Vegetable share of dry matter2.9%-0.005-0.02
Additive share of dry matter0.0%0.163+0.00
Supplement share of dry matter4.4%-0.012-0.05
Other share of dry matter0.0%-0.375+0.00
Unrecognised share of dry matter70.9%-0.027-1.88
Recipe graded poor0.0%-0.065+0.00
Poor-quality meat in recipe0.0%-0.179+0.00
Number of poor ingredients0-0.876+0.00
Largest single poor ingredient0.0%0.060+0.00
Undeclared quantities47.0%-0.106-4.96
Prints ingredient percentagesno0.000+0.00
Complete dietyes2.294+2.29
Frozen or chilled freshno0.000+0.00
High meat (30%+ of dry matter)no0.707+0.00
Low meat (under 10% of dry matter)yes-3.158-3.16
High carb and low meatno-1.180+0.00
Meat share × printed percentages0.00.000+0.00
Meat share × fresh0.00.000+0.00
Fresh × high meat0.011.084+0.00
Additive penalty0.000.222+0.00
Processing multiplier0.9833.786+33.11
Processing: Rawno-0.054+0.00
Processing: Fresh Chilledno-2.354+0.00
Processing: Fresh Frozenno-2.354+0.00
Processing: Fresh Refrigeratedno0.000+0.00
Processing: Fresh Shelfno-0.672+0.00
Processing: Dry Freeze Driedno6.629+0.00
Processing: Dry Air Driedno6.331+0.00
Processing: Dry Cold Pressedno-6.713+0.00
Processing: Dry Bakedyes-6.713-6.71
Processing: Dry Extrudedno-6.713+0.00
Processing: Dry Semi Moistno-6.174+0.00
Processing: Dry Mueslino-10.146+0.00
Processing: Wet Pateno-0.672+0.00
Processing: Wet Chunksno-0.672+0.00
Processing-type offset
+0.02
Additives declared on label
+1 transparency bonus
Subtotal
51.0
Final score
51/100

Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.

Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges

How the declared analysis compares with FEDIAF reference ranges for adult dogs. The label prints as-fed values; we convert to a dry-matter basis before scoring, and the bands are dry-matter ranges. Scores rise to 100 at the band midpoint: the reference is adequacy, not maximisation. Nutrients with a published upper limit taper again above it; fat is policed through calorie density rather than a direct penalty.

NutrientAs fed (label)Dry matter (scored)Score
Protein1921.6 (band 18 to 40%)79.8
Fat8.59.7 (band 5.5 to 20%)87.2
Fibre33.4 (band 0.5 to 5%)100
Calcium1.51.7 (band 0.5 to 2.5%)100
Phosphorus1.21.4 (band 0.4 to 1.6%)100
Calcium:phosphorus ratio1.31.3 (band 1 to 2%)85
Energy (kcal/100g)338384.1100

Scored over 7 declared nutrients (combined weight 90); undeclared nutrients do not affect the score. Moisture was not declared and was estimated at 12% from the food type.

Medium confidence: the full five-part analysis is on file; where moisture was not declared it was estimated from the food type.

This measures agreement with published reference ranges, not suitability for an individual dog. For medical conditions, follow veterinary guidance.

Transparency: what the label discloses

How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.

ItemPoints
✓ Ingredient list on the label (mandatory)10/10
✓ Printed percentages on the label (53% of the recipe mass) (voluntary)10.6/20
✗ Analytical constituents declared (mandatory) - not on file0/15
✓ Additives declared (mandatory)5/10
✓ Energy value declared (voluntary)5/5
✓ Complete/complementary designation (mandatory)5/5
✓ Feeding guidance given (mandatory)10/10
✓ Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory)5/10
✓ Country of manufacture stated (voluntary)10/10
✗ Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file0/5

Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Analytical constituents declared, Batch and date labelling).

Safety: recall history

Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.

No recalls recorded in our database.

Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it

The claims made on the pack and product page, checked against the declared label. We record claims as stated; "consistent" means our stored label data supports the claim, "contradicted" means it conflicts with it. Functional claims are recorded but never scored.

50/100 · limited — 2 checkable claims: 1 consistent, 1 contradicted.

Contradicted by the label

  • "Single Meat Konzept: Ente als einzige tierische Proteinquelle" — the declared label says otherwise on single protein.

Consistent with the label

  • "Getreidefreie Rezeptur: Ideal für empfindliche Hunde und Allergiker" — supported by the declared grain-free data.

6 further claims on file that we cannot check against the label.

Limited: at least one claim contradicts the declared label, or a recent upheld ASA ruling applies.

ClaimTypeCheckSubstantiation
Zahnpflege schon beim Kauen (on pack)Functionalnot checkableManufacturer assertion
Auch für ernährungssensible Hunde oder bei Ausschlussdiäten optimal geeignet (on page)Functionalnot checkableManufacturer assertion
Natürliche Zutaten (on pack)Contentnot checkableManufacturer assertion
Schonend gebacken, frisch aus dem Steinofen (on pack)Contentnot checkableManufacturer assertion
Getreidefreie Rezeptur: Ideal für empfindliche Hunde und Allergiker (on pack)Free-fromconsistentManufacturer assertion
Single Meat Konzept: Ente als einzige tierische Proteinquelle (on pack)ContentcontradictedManufacturer assertion
Getreidefreie Vollnahrung für kleine Hunde nach dem Single Meat Konzept (on pack)Contentnot checkableManufacturer assertion
Ohne künstliche Farb- und Konservierungsstoffe oder Geschmacksverstärker (on pack)Free-fromnot checkableManufacturer assertion

The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.

Other products from Bubeck

See all products from Bubeck

Alternatives to Ente No. 22 kleine Rassen getreidefrei

Foods in our database that are similar on ingredients, protein, format or price. Scores and figures are from the same deterministic model used everywhere on the site.

See all alternatives

Community

Owners' verdict
0 votes

Comments (0)

No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.

Comments are reviewed before they appear.