Our verdict
Is Meisterbarf Fertigbarf Pute gewolft a good dog food?
We score it 62/100 (Average). This reflects the ingredient quality, composition and label transparency of the recipe as declared on the label.
Who is this food for?
Suits
- Labelled by the manufacturer for adult dogs
- Grain-free: no grain ingredients listed
- Single named protein: turkey
- Doesn't list chicken, beef, lamb, fish, venison, pork, duck as ingredients
These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Find foods that fit your dog.
Ingredients (18)3% of the recipe is estimated
Estimated composition
- unknown 73.0%
- veg 21.0%
- meat 3.0%
- supplement 1.1%
- fibre 0.6%
- mineral 0.6%
- oil 0.4%
- other 0.3%
| # | As declared | Matched | Label reading | Declared % | Est. % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 64% Turkey Muscle Meat | Turkey Muscle Meat | meat · good | 64 | 64.0 |
| 2 | 8% Carrot | Carrots | veg · good | 8 | 8.0 |
| 3 | 6% Parsnip | Parsnips | veg · good | 6 | 6.0 |
| 4 | 5% Turkey Heart | Turkey Heart | meat · good | 5 | 5.0 |
| 5 | 4% Turkey Gizzard | Turkey Gizzard | meat · good | 4 | 4.0 |
| 6 | 4% Celery | Celery Seeds | veg · good | 4 | 4.0 |
| 7 | 3% Turkey Liver | Turkey liver | meat · good | 3 | 3.0 |
| 8 | 3% Apple | Apples | veg · good | 3 | 3.0 |
| 9 | Linseed Oil | Linseed oil | oil · good | - | 0.4 |
| 10 | Algal Limestone | Limestone | mineral · medium | - | 0.4 |
| 11 | Moringa Powder | Moringa Powder | supplement · good | - | 0.3 |
| 12 | Hemp Leaf Powder | Hemp Leaf Powder | supplement · good | - | 0.3 |
| 13 | Linseed Cake | Linseed Cake | fibre · medium | - | 0.3 |
| 14 | Pumpkin Seed Flour | Pumpkin Seed Meal | fibre · good | - | 0.3 |
| 15 | Dried Peat | Moor | other · medium | - | 0.3 |
| 16 | Seaweed Meal | Seaweed Meal | supplement · medium | - | 0.3 |
| 17 | Sea Salt | Sea Salt | mineral · medium | - | 0.2 |
| 18 | Propolis Powder | Propolis Powder | supplement · good | - | 0.2 |
- 1. 64% Turkey Muscle Meat64% declared64.0% estimated
- 2. 8% Carrot8% declared8.0% estimated
- 3. 6% Parsnip6% declared6.0% estimated
- 4. 5% Turkey Heart5% declared5.0% estimated
- 5. 4% Turkey Gizzard4% declared4.0% estimated
- 6. 4% Celery4% declared4.0% estimated
- 7. 3% Turkey Liver3% declared3.0% estimated
- 8. 3% Apple3% declared3.0% estimated
- 9. Linseed Oil0.4% estimated
- 10. Algal Limestone0.4% estimated
- 11. Moringa Powder0.3% estimated
- 12. Hemp Leaf Powder0.3% estimated
- 13. Linseed Cake0.3% estimated
- 14. Pumpkin Seed Flour0.3% estimated
- 15. Dried Peat0.3% estimated
- 16. Seaweed Meal0.3% estimated
- 17. Sea Salt0.2% estimated
- 18. Propolis Powder0.2% estimated
Nutrition and feedingProtein 15.50% · Fat 4.30%
Typical analysis (as fed)
| Nutrient | As fed |
|---|---|
| Protein | 15.50% |
| Fat | 4.30% |
| Fibre | 0.80% |
| Ash | 1.50% |
| Moisture | 75% |
Energy: 101 kcal/100g
Additives & feeding info
Feeding and storage
Storage
Bitte lagere die verschlossenen Päckchen bei -18 °C getrennt von anderen Lebensmitteln in deinem Gefrierfach. Nach dem Anbruch im Kühlschrank aufbewahren und innerhalb von maximal 3 Tagen aufbrauchen. Tiefkühlprodukte auftauen im Kühlschrank über Nacht.
Feeding guide
Ausgewachsene Hunde: ca. 2 - 3 % des Körpergewichts pro Tag. Welpen: ca. 6 - 8 % des aktuellen Körpergewichts pro Tag. Junghunde sowie trächtige/laktierende Hündinnen: 5 - 7 % des Körpergewichts pro Tag. Kleinere Rassen (bis ca. 15 kg): ca. 3 - 6 % des Körpergewichts pro Tag.
No additives recorded yet.
Trust and sourceNo recalls recorded in our database · checked 2026-09-19
Brand and contact: Meisterbarf
- Website
- https://www.meisterbarf.de/
- Phone
- 04627 - 963 97 88
Trust and provenance
- Recall history
- No recalls recorded in our database
- Label data last checked
- 2026-09-19
- Scored with
- Model v3 (methodology)
- Product page
- www.meisterbarf.de
Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.
Brand and retailer reviews
External platform ratings are not scores for this individual recipe.
Trustpilot: 4.5/5 · 206 reviews
Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.
Score details and methodologyCalculations, history and evidence
Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated
Why this score?
The overall score is 62 out of 100. The overall quality of the ingredient list contributed +1.2 points, and the meat content contributed +0.2 points. On the downside, ingredients we could not classify took away -2.2 points, and ingredients without printed percentages took away -0.3 points.
Scored with model v3 on 2026-10-25. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.1 | 9.191 | +1.22 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 1.9% | 0.096 | +0.19 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 0.9% | -0.092 | -0.08 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 7.3% | -0.005 | -0.04 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 2.4% | -0.012 | -0.03 |
| Other share of dry matter | 0.3% | -0.375 | -0.12 |
| Unrecognised share of dry matter | 84.6% | -0.027 | -2.24 |
| Undeclared quantities | 3.0% | -0.106 | -0.32 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | yes | -3.158 | -3.16 |
| Processing multiplier | 1.12 | 33.786 | +37.84 |
| Processing: Raw | yes | -0.054 | -0.05 |
Show all 40 components
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.1 | 9.191 | +1.22 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 1.9% | 0.096 | +0.19 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.115 | +0.00 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 0.9% | -0.092 | -0.08 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 7.3% | -0.005 | -0.04 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 0.0% | 0.163 | +0.00 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 2.4% | -0.012 | -0.03 |
| Other share of dry matter | 0.3% | -0.375 | -0.12 |
| Unrecognised share of dry matter | 84.6% | -0.027 | -2.24 |
| Recipe graded poor | 0.0% | -0.065 | +0.00 |
| Poor-quality meat in recipe | 0.0% | -0.179 | +0.00 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 0 | -0.876 | +0.00 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 0.0% | 0.060 | +0.00 |
| Undeclared quantities | 3.0% | -0.106 | -0.32 |
| Prints ingredient percentages | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Complete diet | no | 2.294 | +0.00 |
| Frozen or chilled fresh | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| High meat (30%+ of dry matter) | no | 0.707 | +0.00 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | yes | -3.158 | -3.16 |
| High carb and low meat | no | -1.180 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × printed percentages | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × fresh | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Fresh × high meat | 0.0 | 11.084 | +0.00 |
| Additive penalty | -0.00 | 0.222 | -0.00 |
| Processing multiplier | 1.12 | 33.786 | +37.84 |
| Processing: Raw | yes | -0.054 | -0.05 |
| Processing: Fresh Chilled | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Frozen | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Refrigerated | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Shelf | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Freeze Dried | no | 6.629 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Air Dried | no | 6.331 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Cold Pressed | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Baked | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Semi Moist | no | -6.174 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Muesli | no | -10.146 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Pate | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Chunks | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
- Processing-type offset
- -1.74
- Subtotal
- 62.4
- Final score
- 62/100
Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.
Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges
How the declared analysis compares with FEDIAF reference ranges for adult dogs. The label prints as-fed values; we convert to a dry-matter basis before scoring, and the bands are dry-matter ranges. Scores rise to 100 at the band midpoint: the reference is adequacy, not maximisation. Nutrients with a published upper limit taper again above it; fat is policed through calorie density rather than a direct penalty.
| Nutrient | As fed (label) | Dry matter (scored) | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| Protein | 15.5 | 62 (band 18.18 to 40%) | 100 |
| Fat | 4.3 | 17.2 (band 5.555 to 20%) | 100 |
| Fibre | 0.8 | 3.2 (band 0.5 to 5%) | 100 |
| Energy (kcal/100g) | 101 | 404 | 100 |
Scored over 4 declared nutrients (combined weight 60); undeclared nutrients do not affect the score.
No nutritional additives section declared on the label.
Medium confidence: the full five-part analysis is on file; where moisture was not declared it was estimated from the food type.
This measures agreement with published reference ranges, not suitability for an individual dog. For medical conditions, follow veterinary guidance.
Transparency: what the label discloses
How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.
| Item | Points |
|---|---|
| Ingredient list on the label (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Printed percentages on the label (97% of the recipe mass) (voluntary) | 19.4/20 |
| Analytical constituents declared (mandatory) | 15/15 |
| Additives declared (mandatory) - not on file | 0/10 |
| Energy value declared (voluntary) | 5/5 |
| Complete/complementary designation (mandatory) | 5/5 |
| Feeding guidance given (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory) | 5/10 |
| Country of manufacture stated (voluntary) | 10/10 |
| Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file | 0/5 |
Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Additives declared, Batch and date labelling).
Safety: recall history
Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.
No recalls recorded in our database.
Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it
The claims made on the pack and product page, checked against the declared label. We record claims as stated; "consistent" means our stored label data supports the claim, "contradicted" means it conflicts with it. Functional claims are recorded but never scored.
100/100 · moderate — 1 checkable claim: 1 consistent, 0 contradicted.
Consistent with the label
- "Monoprotein Alleinfutter für gesunde ausgewachsene Hunde jeglichen Alters" — supported by the declared single protein data.
4 further claims on file that we cannot check against the label.
Moderate: every checkable claim is consistent with the declared label.
| Claim | Type | Check | Substantiation |
|---|---|---|---|
| artgerechte Rohfütterung mit allen notwendigen Nährstoffen (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Leinöl kann die Gesundheit von Haut und Fell unterstützen sowie positiv auf Herz, Immunsystem und die Verdauung Einfluss nehmen (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Pastinake kann den Aufbau einer gesunden Darmflora unterstützen (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| ohne künstliche Geschmacksverstärker, Zuckerzusatz, Farb- und Lockstoffe (on page) | Free-from | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Monoprotein Alleinfutter für gesunde ausgewachsene Hunde jeglichen Alters (on page) | Content | consistent | Manufacturer assertion |
The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.
Alternatives to Fertigbarf Pute gewolft
Similar on ingredients, protein, format or nutrition, using the same stored data.
Community0 comments
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.