Anifit Zum goldenen Ochsen
Wet Pate complete High meat Clear label Full label
Is Anifit Zum goldenen Ochsen a good dog food?
We score it 82/100 (Good). This reflects the ingredient quality, composition and label transparency of the recipe as declared on the label.
Why this score?
The recipe scores 82 out of 100. The meat content contributed +8.2 points, and the overall quality of the ingredient list added +7.2 points. Being labelled nutritionally complete gave a further +2.3 points, while the carbohydrate content deducted -1 points.
- Recipe82
- Nutritionalmedium98
- Transparency60
- Safety100
- Evidencelimited50
The Recipe score measures how attractive and transparent the declared ingredient list is. It is not, by itself, proof that the food is nutritionally appropriate for long-term feeding. The Nutritional and Evidence scores measure what we can verify towards that stronger claim.
Why you might choose it
- Scores 82, in the top quarter of wet foods we track.
- Meat makes up an estimated 86% of the dry matter (95% as fed).
- Prints ingredient percentages on the label.
Why you might not
- High in fat: 33% fat on a dry-matter basis.
Estimated composition
Typical analysis (as fed)
- Protein
- 10%
- Fat
- 7%
- Fibre
- 0.50%
- Ash
- 2%
- Moisture
- 79%
- Carbohydrates
- 1.50%
- Calcium
- 0.29%
- Phosphorus
- 0.18%
- Sodium
- 0.20%
Additives & feeding info
Nutritional additives
Vitamin D3: 200g IE/kg
Storage
Once opened, use within two days and keep refrigerated; can be frozen if frozen immediately after opening. Best served at room temperature.
Feeding guide
Dogs 2-5 kg: 100-200 g/day; Dogs 6-25 kg: 200-600 g/day; Dogs 26-40 kg: 600-800 g/day
Who is this food for?
Suits
- Labelled by the manufacturer for all lifestages
- Doesn't list turkey, lamb, fish, venison, pork, duck as ingredients
Consider something else if:
- Your dog avoids chicken: it is listed as an ingredient
- Your dog avoids beef: the label lists beef muscle meat
- Your dog avoids grain: the label lists oat flakes
- You want a single-protein recipe: this one lists more than one animal protein
- You are limiting fat: 33.3% on a dry-matter basis is in the high band
These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Use the homepage filter to find foods that fit your dog.
Ingredients (11)
| # | As declared | Matched | Category | Tier | Declared % | Est. % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Chicken Muscle Meat (38%) | Muscle Meat | meat | good | 38 | 38.0 |
| 2 | Beef Muscle Meat (31%) | Beef muscle meat | meat | good | 31 | 31.0 |
| 3 | Beef Lung (19%) | Beef lung | meat | medium | 19 | 19.0 |
| 4 | Beef Liver (7%) | Beef Liver | meat | good | 7 | 7.0 |
| 5 | Oat Flakes (3%) | Oat Flakes | carb | medium | 3 | 3.0 |
| 6 | Dried Carrots | Carrots | veg | good | - | 0.4 |
| 7 | Calcium Carbonate | Calcium Carbonate | supplement | medium | - | 0.4 |
| 8 | Salt | Salt | additive | medium | - | 0.4 |
| 9 | Inulin | Inulin | fibre | good | - | 0.3 |
| 10 | Dried Tomatoes | Tomato | veg | good | - | 0.3 |
| 11 | Dried Rosehip | Rose Hip | veg | good | - | 0.2 |
Brand
- Website
- https://www.anifit.de/
- Phone
- 089 461 488 0
- Address
- Provital GmbH, Bergstraße 15, 82024 Taufkirchen, Germany
- Contact page
- www.anifit.de
Trust and provenance
- Recall history
- No recalls recorded in our database
- Label data last checked
- 2026-09-19
- Scored with
- Model v3 (methodology)
- Product page
- www.anifit.de
Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.
Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.
Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated
Scored with model v3 on 2026-09-26. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.8 | 9.191 | +7.17 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 85.7% | 0.096 | +8.22 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 8.5% | -0.115 | -0.98 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 2.7% | -0.005 | -0.01 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 1.0% | 0.163 | +0.17 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 1.1% | -0.012 | -0.01 |
| Undeclared quantities | 2.0% | -0.106 | -0.21 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| High meat (30%+ of dry matter) | yes | 0.707 | +0.71 |
| Additive penalty | -0.43 | 0.222 | -0.10 |
| Processing multiplier | 1.00 | 33.786 | +33.79 |
| Processing: Wet Pate | yes | -0.672 | -0.67 |
Show all 40 components
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.8 | 9.191 | +7.17 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 85.7% | 0.096 | +8.22 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 8.5% | -0.115 | -0.98 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.092 | +0.00 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 2.7% | -0.005 | -0.01 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 1.0% | 0.163 | +0.17 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 1.1% | -0.012 | -0.01 |
| Other share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.375 | +0.00 |
| Unrecognised share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.027 | +0.00 |
| Recipe graded poor | 0.0% | -0.065 | +0.00 |
| Poor-quality meat in recipe | 0.0% | -0.179 | +0.00 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 0 | -0.876 | +0.00 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 0.0% | 0.060 | +0.00 |
| Undeclared quantities | 2.0% | -0.106 | -0.21 |
| Prints ingredient percentages | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| Frozen or chilled fresh | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| High meat (30%+ of dry matter) | yes | 0.707 | +0.71 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | no | -3.158 | +0.00 |
| High carb and low meat | no | -1.180 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × printed percentages | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × fresh | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Fresh × high meat | 0.0 | 11.084 | +0.00 |
| Additive penalty | -0.43 | 0.222 | -0.10 |
| Processing multiplier | 1.00 | 33.786 | +33.79 |
| Processing: Raw | no | -0.054 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Chilled | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Frozen | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Refrigerated | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Shelf | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Freeze Dried | no | 6.629 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Air Dried | no | 6.331 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Cold Pressed | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Baked | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Semi Moist | no | -6.174 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Muesli | no | -10.146 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Pate | yes | -0.672 | -0.67 |
| Processing: Wet Chunks | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
- Processing-type offset
- -0.08
- Additives declared on label
- +1 transparency bonus
- Subtotal
- 82.2
- Final score
- 82/100
Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.
Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges
How the declared analysis compares with FEDIAF reference ranges for adult dogs. The label prints as-fed values; we convert to a dry-matter basis before scoring, and the bands are dry-matter ranges. Scores rise to 100 at the band midpoint: the reference is adequacy, not maximisation. Nutrients with a published upper limit taper again above it; fat is policed through calorie density rather than a direct penalty.
| Nutrient | As fed (label) | Dry matter (scored) | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| Protein | 10 | 47.6 (band 18 to 40%) | 100 |
| Fat | 7 | 33.3 (band 5.5 to 20%) | 100 |
| Fibre | 0.5 | 2.4 (band 0.5 to 5%) | 95.1 |
| Calcium | 0.29 | 1.4 (band 0.5 to 2.5%) | 96.4 |
| Phosphorus | 0.18 | 0.9 (band 0.4 to 1.6%) | 92.9 |
| Calcium:phosphorus ratio | 1.6 | 1.6 (band 1 to 2%) | 100 |
Scored over 6 declared nutrients (combined weight 80); undeclared nutrients do not affect the score.
Medium confidence: the full five-part analysis is on file; where moisture was not declared it was estimated from the food type.
This measures agreement with published reference ranges, not suitability for an individual dog. For medical conditions, follow veterinary guidance.
Transparency: what the label discloses
How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.
| Item | Points |
|---|---|
| Ingredient list on the label (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Printed percentages on the label (98% of the recipe mass) (voluntary) | 19.6/20 |
| Analytical constituents declared (mandatory) | 15/15 |
| Additives declared (mandatory) | 5/10 |
| Energy value declared (voluntary) - not on file | 0/5 |
| Complete/complementary designation (mandatory) | 5/5 |
| Feeding guidance given (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Country of manufacture stated (voluntary) | 10/10 |
| Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file | 0/5 |
Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Batch and date labelling).
Safety: recall history
Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.
No recalls recorded in our database.
Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it
The claims made on the pack and product page, checked against the declared label. We record claims as stated; "consistent" means our stored label data supports the claim, "contradicted" means it conflicts with it. Functional claims are recorded but never scored.
50/100 · limited — 2 checkable claims: 1 consistent, 1 contradicted.
Contradicted by the label
- "free from plant and cereal flours" — the declared label says otherwise on grain-free.
Consistent with the label
- "Completely balanced dog food" — supported by the declared complete and balanced data.
13 further claims on file that we cannot check against the label.
Limited: at least one claim contradicts the declared label, or a recent upheld ASA ruling applies.
| Claim | Type | Check | Substantiation |
|---|---|---|---|
| no animal testing (on pack) | provenance | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| appropriate for every life stage (on pack) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| free from preservatives and colourings (on pack) | Free-from | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| free from attractants and fillers (on pack) | Free-from | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| delicately prepared using a cold filling process (on pack) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| contains only meat which has been approved for human consumption (on pack) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| free from plant and cereal flours (on pack) | Free-from | contradicted | Manufacturer assertion |
| wholesome meat products containing 90-99% meat (on pack) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| free from soya and corn (on pack) | Free-from | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Free of gluten (on pack) | Free-from | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Completely balanced dog food (on pack) | Content | consistent | Manufacturer assertion |
| Fresh meat guarantee (on pack) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| free from sugar and other flavour enhancing substances (on pack) | Free-from | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| free from animal meal (on pack) | Free-from | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| contains only natural raw ingredients (on pack) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.
Other products from Anifit
Alternatives to Zum goldenen Ochsen
Foods in our database that are similar on ingredients, protein, format or price. Scores and figures are from the same deterministic model used everywhere on the site.
Community
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.