Our verdict
Is Anifit Party with Elk a good dog food?
We score it 82/100 (Good). This reflects the ingredient quality, composition and label transparency of the recipe as declared on the label.
Who is this food for?
Suits
- Labelled by the manufacturer for all lifestages
- Grain-free: no grain ingredients listed
- Doesn't list beef, turkey, lamb, fish, pork, duck as ingredients
Consider something else if:
- Your dog avoids chicken: the label lists chicken muscle meat
- Your dog avoids venison: it is listed as an ingredient
- You want a single-protein recipe: this one lists more than one animal protein
- You are limiting fat: 38.1% on a dry-matter basis is in the high band
These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Find foods that fit your dog.
Ingredients (7)6 of 7 percentages printed
Estimated composition
- meat 94.0%
- carb 5.0%
- veg 1.0%
| # | As declared | Matched | Label reading | Declared % | Est. % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Chicken muscle meat 68% | Chicken Muscle Meat | meat · good | 68 | 68.0 |
| 2 | Elk muscle meat 12% | Muscle Meat | meat · good | 12 | 12.0 |
| 3 | Chicken liver 9% | Chicken Liver | meat · good | 9 | 9.0 |
| 4 | Chicken lung 5% | Lung | meat · medium | 5 | 5.0 |
| 5 | Dried potatoes 5% | Potatoes | carb · medium | 5 | 5.0 |
| 6 | minerals | Vitamins and minerals | supplement · medium | - | 0.0 |
| 7 | dried lingonberries 1% | Lingonberries | veg · good | 1 | 1.0 |
- 1. Chicken muscle meat 68%68% declared68.0% estimated
- 2. Elk muscle meat 12%12% declared12.0% estimated
- 3. Chicken liver 9%9% declared9.0% estimated
- 4. Chicken lung 5%5% declared5.0% estimated
- 5. Dried potatoes 5%5% declared5.0% estimated
- 6. minerals0.0% estimated
- 7. dried lingonberries 1%1% declared1.0% estimated
Nutrition and feedingProtein 10% · Fat 8%
Typical analysis (as fed)
| Nutrient | As fed |
|---|---|
| Protein | 10% |
| Fat | 8% |
| Fibre | 0.40% |
| Ash | 2.50% |
| Moisture | 79% |
Additives & feeding info
Feeding and storage
Feeding guide
Dogs 2-5 kg: 100-200 g daily; Dogs 6-25 kg: 200-600 g daily; Dogs 26-40 kg: 600-800 g daily
Additives declared on the label
Nutritional additives
Vitamin D3: 140 IU/kg; Vitamin E: 30 mg; Copper (as copper(II) sulphate pentahydrate): 2.3 mg; Manganese (as manganese(II) oxide): 2 mg; Zinc (as zinc sulphate monohydrate): 20 mg; Iodine (as anhydrous calcium iodate): 0.5 mg
Trust and sourceNo recalls recorded in our database · checked 2026-09-19
Brand and contact: Anifit
- Website
- https://www.anifit.de/
- Phone
- 089 461 488 0
- Address
- Provital GmbH, Bergstraße 15, 82024 Taufkirchen, Germany
- Contact page
- www.anifit.de
Trust and provenance
- Recall history
- No recalls recorded in our database
- Label data last checked
- 2026-09-19
- Scored with
- Model v3 (methodology)
- Product page
- www.anifit.de
Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.
Brand and retailer reviews
External platform ratings are not scores for this individual recipe.
Trustpilot: 4.6/5 · 479 reviews
Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.
Score details and methodologyCalculations, history and evidence
Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated
Why this score?
This recipe scored 82 out of 100 in our review. The overall quality of the ingredient list contributed +8.1 points, while the meat content added +8 points and being labelled nutritionally complete added a further +2.3 points. The carbohydrate content worked against the score, taking -1.6 points off the total.
Scored with model v3 on 2026-10-25. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.9 | 9.191 | +8.14 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 83.0% | 0.096 | +7.97 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 14.2% | -0.115 | -1.63 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 2.8% | -0.005 | -0.01 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| High meat (30%+ of dry matter) | yes | 0.707 | +0.71 |
| Processing multiplier | 1.00 | 33.786 | +33.79 |
| Processing: Wet Chunks | yes | -0.672 | -0.67 |
Show all 40 components
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.9 | 9.191 | +8.14 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 83.0% | 0.096 | +7.97 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 14.2% | -0.115 | -1.63 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.092 | +0.00 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 2.8% | -0.005 | -0.01 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 0.0% | 0.163 | +0.00 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.012 | +0.00 |
| Other share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.375 | +0.00 |
| Unrecognised share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.027 | +0.00 |
| Recipe graded poor | 0.0% | -0.065 | +0.00 |
| Poor-quality meat in recipe | 0.0% | -0.179 | +0.00 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 0 | -0.876 | +0.00 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 0.0% | 0.060 | +0.00 |
| Undeclared quantities | 0.0% | -0.106 | +0.00 |
| Prints ingredient percentages | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| Frozen or chilled fresh | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| High meat (30%+ of dry matter) | yes | 0.707 | +0.71 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | no | -3.158 | +0.00 |
| High carb and low meat | no | -1.180 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × printed percentages | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × fresh | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Fresh × high meat | 0.0 | 11.084 | +0.00 |
| Additive penalty | 0.00 | 0.222 | +0.00 |
| Processing multiplier | 1.00 | 33.786 | +33.79 |
| Processing: Raw | no | -0.054 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Chilled | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Frozen | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Refrigerated | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Shelf | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Freeze Dried | no | 6.629 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Air Dried | no | 6.331 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Cold Pressed | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Baked | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Semi Moist | no | -6.174 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Muesli | no | -10.146 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Pate | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Chunks | yes | -0.672 | -0.67 |
- Processing-type offset
- -0.08
- Additives declared on label
- +1 transparency bonus
- Subtotal
- 82.4
- Final score
- 82/100
Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.
Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges
How the declared analysis compares with FEDIAF reference ranges for adult dogs. The label prints as-fed values; we convert to a dry-matter basis before scoring, and the bands are dry-matter ranges. Scores rise to 100 at the band midpoint: the reference is adequacy, not maximisation. Nutrients with a published upper limit taper again above it; fat is policed through calorie density rather than a direct penalty.
| Nutrient | As fed (label) | Dry matter (scored) | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| Protein | 10 | 47.6 (band 18 to 40%) | 100 |
| Fat | 8 | 38.1 (band 5.5 to 20%) | 100 |
| Fibre | 0.4 | 1.9 (band 0.5 to 5%) | 88.7 |
Scored over 3 declared nutrients (combined weight 50); undeclared nutrients do not affect the score.
Declared fortification: 6 nutritional additives on the label
- Vitamin D3: 140 IU/kg
- Vitamin E: 30 mg
- Copper (as copper(II) sulphate pentahydrate): 2.3 mg
- Manganese (as manganese(II) oxide): 2 mg
- Zinc (as zinc sulphate monohydrate): 20 mg
- Iodine (as anhydrous calcium iodate): 0.5 mg
Medium confidence: the full five-part analysis is on file; where moisture was not declared it was estimated from the food type.
This measures agreement with published reference ranges, not suitability for an individual dog. For medical conditions, follow veterinary guidance.
Transparency: what the label discloses
How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.
| Item | Points |
|---|---|
| Ingredient list on the label (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Printed percentages on the label (100% of the recipe mass) (voluntary) | 20/20 |
| Analytical constituents declared (mandatory) | 15/15 |
| Additives declared (mandatory) | 5/10 |
| Energy value declared (voluntary) - not on file | 0/5 |
| Complete/complementary designation (mandatory) | 5/5 |
| Feeding guidance given (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Country of manufacture stated (voluntary) | 10/10 |
| Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file | 0/5 |
Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Batch and date labelling).
Safety: recall history
Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.
No recalls recorded in our database.
Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it
The claims made on the pack and product page, checked against the declared label. We record claims as stated; "consistent" means our stored label data supports the claim, "contradicted" means it conflicts with it. Functional claims are recorded but never scored.
50/100 · limited — 2 checkable claims: 1 consistent, 1 contradicted.
Contradicted by the label
- "68% chicken muscle meat" — the declared label says otherwise on single protein.
Consistent with the label
- "no cereal or plant-based flours" — supported by the declared grain-free data.
14 further claims on file that we cannot check against the label.
Limited: at least one claim contradicts the declared label, or a recent upheld ASA ruling applies.
| Claim | Type | Check | Substantiation |
|---|---|---|---|
| 94% meat (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| appropriate for every life stage (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Fresh meat guarantee (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Free of gluten (on page) | Free-from | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| suitable for dogs of all breeds and ages (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| nutritionally complete (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| free from attractants and fillers (on page) | Free-from | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| 68% chicken muscle meat (on page) | Content | contradicted | Manufacturer assertion |
| no cereal or plant-based flours (on page) | Free-from | consistent | Manufacturer assertion |
| 12% moose muscle meat (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| free from soya and corn (on page) | Free-from | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| gluten-free and non-GMO (on page) | Free-from | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| no animal meal (on page) | Free-from | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| free from sugar and other flavour enhancing substances (on page) | Free-from | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| no artificial flavours, colours or preservatives (on page) | Free-from | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Quality from Sweden ISO 9001 (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.
Alternatives to Party with Elk
Similar on ingredients, protein, format or nutrition, using the same stored data.
Community0 comments
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.