Our verdict
Is ROCKY MOUNTAIN RAW Frozen Pork and Duck Formula a good dog food?
We score it 69/100 (Average). This reflects the ingredient quality, composition and label transparency of the recipe as declared on the label.
Who is this food for?
Suits
- Labelled by the manufacturer for all lifestages
- Grain-free: no grain ingredients listed
- Doesn't list chicken, beef, turkey, lamb, venison as ingredients
Consider something else if:
- Your dog avoids fish: the label lists cod liver oil
- Your dog avoids pork: the label lists pork liver
- Your dog avoids duck: the label lists duck
- You want a single-protein recipe: this one lists more than one animal protein
These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Find foods that fit your dog.
Ingredients (16)20% of the recipe is estimated
Estimated composition
- mineral 81.0%
- veg 5.9%
- supplement 5.4%
- meat 5.0%
- oil 1.4%
- unknown 1.3%
| # | As declared | Matched | Label reading | Declared % | Est. % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Duck | Duck | meat · medium | - | 1.7 |
| 2 | 80% lean with bone | Bone | mineral · medium | 80 | 80.0 |
| 3 | Pork Liver | Pork Liver | meat · good | - | 1.7 |
| 4 | Pork Heart | Pork (heart) | meat · good | - | 1.6 |
| 5 | Spinach | Spinach | veg · good | - | 1.6 |
| 6 | Kale | Kale | veg · good | - | 1.5 |
| 7 | Blueberries | Blueberries | veg · good | - | 1.4 |
| 8 | Cod Liver Oil | Cod Liver Oil | oil · good | - | 1.4 |
| 9 | Dried Kelp | Kelp | veg · good | - | 1.3 |
| 10 | Joint Formula | unmatched | - | - | 1.3 |
| 11 | Zinc | Zinc Oxide | supplement · good | - | 1.2 |
| 12 | Magnesium | Magnesium Oxide | supplement · good | - | 1.2 |
| 13 | Choline | Choline | supplement · good | - | 1.1 |
| 14 | Copper | Copper | mineral · good | - | 1.0 |
| 15 | Manganese | Manganese | supplement · good | - | 1.0 |
| 16 | Vitamin E | Vitamin E | supplement · good | - | 0.9 |
- 1. Duck1.7% estimated
- 2. 80% lean with bone80% declared80.0% estimated
- 3. Pork Liver1.7% estimated
- 4. Pork Heart1.6% estimated
- 5. Spinach1.6% estimated
- 6. Kale1.5% estimated
- 7. Blueberries1.4% estimated
- 8. Cod Liver Oil1.4% estimated
- 9. Dried Kelp1.3% estimated
- 10. Joint Formula1.3% estimated
- 11. Zinc1.2% estimated
- 12. Magnesium1.2% estimated
- 13. Choline1.1% estimated
- 14. Copper1.0% estimated
- 15. Manganese1.0% estimated
- 16. Vitamin E0.9% estimated
Nutrition and feeding
Declared analysis (as fed)
No analysis recorded yet.
Additives & feeding info
Feeding and storage
Storage
Sold fresh in stores only; kept cold and hand-packed; not available to ship online (frozen raw food).
No additives recorded yet.
Trust and sourceNo recalls recorded in our database · checked 2026-09-19
Brand and contact: ROCKY MOUNTAIN RAW
Trust and provenance
- Recall history
- No recalls recorded in our database
- Label data last checked
- 2026-09-19
- Scored with
- Model v3 (methodology)
- Product page
- www.rockymountainraw.com
Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.
Brand and retailer reviews
External platform ratings are not scores for this individual recipe.
Trustpilot: 4.2/5 · 4,373 reviews
Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.
Score details and methodologyCalculations, history and evidence
Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated
Why this score?
This product reached a score of 69 out of 100. The overall quality of the ingredient list contributed +5 points, while being labelled nutritionally complete added a further +2.3 points. On the downside, ingredients without printed percentages reduced the score by -2.1 points, and the oil and fat content took off -0.1 points.
Scored with model v3 on 2026-10-25. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.5 | 9.191 | +4.95 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 1.6% | -0.092 | -0.15 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 2.2% | -0.005 | -0.01 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 5.7% | -0.012 | -0.07 |
| Unrecognised share of dry matter | 0.7% | -0.027 | -0.02 |
| Undeclared quantities | 20.0% | -0.106 | -2.11 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | yes | -3.158 | -3.16 |
| Processing multiplier | 1.12 | 33.786 | +37.84 |
| Processing: Raw | yes | -0.054 | -0.05 |
Show all 40 components
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.5 | 9.191 | +4.95 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 0.0% | 0.096 | +0.00 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.115 | +0.00 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 1.6% | -0.092 | -0.15 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 2.2% | -0.005 | -0.01 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 0.0% | 0.163 | +0.00 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 5.7% | -0.012 | -0.07 |
| Other share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.375 | +0.00 |
| Unrecognised share of dry matter | 0.7% | -0.027 | -0.02 |
| Recipe graded poor | 0.0% | -0.065 | +0.00 |
| Poor-quality meat in recipe | 0.0% | -0.179 | +0.00 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 0 | -0.876 | +0.00 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 0.0% | 0.060 | +0.00 |
| Undeclared quantities | 20.0% | -0.106 | -2.11 |
| Prints ingredient percentages | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| Frozen or chilled fresh | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| High meat (30%+ of dry matter) | no | 0.707 | +0.00 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | yes | -3.158 | -3.16 |
| High carb and low meat | no | -1.180 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × printed percentages | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × fresh | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Fresh × high meat | 0.0 | 11.084 | +0.00 |
| Additive penalty | 0.00 | 0.222 | +0.00 |
| Processing multiplier | 1.12 | 33.786 | +37.84 |
| Processing: Raw | yes | -0.054 | -0.05 |
| Processing: Fresh Chilled | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Frozen | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Refrigerated | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Shelf | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Freeze Dried | no | 6.629 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Air Dried | no | 6.331 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Cold Pressed | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Baked | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Semi Moist | no | -6.174 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Muesli | no | -10.146 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Pate | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Chunks | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
- Processing-type offset
- -1.74
- Subtotal
- 68.7
- Final score
- 69/100
Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.
Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges
Analytical constituents not declared
No nutritional additives section declared on the label.
Transparency: what the label discloses
How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.
| Item | Points |
|---|---|
| Ingredient list on the label (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Printed percentages on the label (80% of the recipe mass) (voluntary) | 16/20 |
| Analytical constituents declared (mandatory) - not on file | 0/15 |
| Additives declared (mandatory) - not on file | 0/10 |
| Energy value declared (voluntary) - not on file | 0/5 |
| Complete/complementary designation (mandatory) | 5/5 |
| Feeding guidance given (mandatory) - not on file | 0/10 |
| Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory) | 5/10 |
| Country of manufacture stated (voluntary) | 10/10 |
| Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file | 0/5 |
Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Analytical constituents declared, Additives declared, Feeding guidance given, Batch and date labelling).
Safety: recall history
Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.
No recalls recorded in our database.
Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it
The claims made on the pack and product page, checked against the declared label. We record claims as stated; "consistent" means our stored label data supports the claim, "contradicted" means it conflicts with it. Functional claims are recorded but never scored.
100/100 · moderate — 1 checkable claim: 1 consistent, 0 contradicted.
Consistent with the label
- "All Formulas are complete and developed with a Pet Nutritionist according to AAFCO standards for Balanced Nutrition" — supported by the declared complete and balanced data.
1 further claim on file that we cannot check against the label.
Moderate: every checkable claim is consistent with the declared label.
| Claim | Type | Check | Substantiation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Frozen raw food is kept cold and hand-packed for local retailers (on page) | provenance | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| All Formulas are complete and developed with a Pet Nutritionist according to AAFCO standards for Balanced Nutrition (on page) | Content | consistent | Manufacturer assertion |
The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.
Alternatives to Frozen Pork and Duck Formula
Similar on ingredients, protein, format or nutrition, using the same stored data.
Community0 comments
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.