Our verdict
Is Riplee's Ranch Turkey Recipe Canned Dog Food a good dog food?
We score it 53/100 (Average). This reflects the ingredient quality, composition and label transparency of the recipe as declared on the label.
100% of this recipe has no printed percentage. Estimated shares are model estimates, not label facts.
Who is this food for?
Suits
- Labelled by the manufacturer for all lifestages
- Grain-free: no grain ingredients listed
- Doesn't list beef, lamb, fish, venison, pork, duck as ingredients
Consider something else if:
- Your dog avoids chicken: the label lists chicken liver
- Your dog avoids turkey: the label lists turkey
- You want a single-protein recipe: this one lists more than one animal protein
These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Find foods that fit your dog.
Ingredients (11)100% of the recipe is estimated
Estimated composition
- supplement 52.6%
- veg 15.6%
- meat 6.9%
- other 6.7%
- carb 6.5%
- additive 6.4%
- mineral 5.3%
| # | As declared | Matched | Label reading | Declared % | Est. % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Boneless turkey | Turkey | meat · medium | - | 11.8 |
| 2 | water sufficient for processing | Water | other | - | 11.2 |
| 3 | pea starch | Pea Starch | carb · poor | - | 10.7 |
| 4 | chicken liver | Chicken Liver | meat · good | - | 10.2 |
| 5 | minerals: (salt, calcium carbonate, monodicalcium phosphate, choline chloride, potassium chloride, zinc proteinate, iron proteinate, copper proteinate, manganese proteinate, calcium iodate) | Vitamins and minerals | supplement · medium | - | 9.6 |
| 6 | vitamins: (vitamin E supplement, niacin, vitamin A supplement, thiamine mononitrate, riboflavin, biotin, vitamin B12 supplement, folic acid, vitamin D3 supplement, d-calcium pantothenate) | Vitamin | supplement · good | - | 9.1 |
| 7 | taurine | Taurine | supplement · good | - | 8.6 |
| 8 | kale | Kale | veg · good | - | 8.0 |
| 9 | blueberries | Blueberries | veg · good | - | 7.5 |
| 10 | cranberries | Cranberries | veg · good | - | 7.0 |
| 11 | coconut | Coconut | veg · good | - | 6.4 |
- 1. Boneless turkey11.8% estimated
- 2. water sufficient for processing11.2% estimated
- 3. pea starch10.7% estimated
- 4. chicken liver10.2% estimated
- 5. minerals: (salt, calcium carbonate, monodicalcium phosphate, choline chloride, potassium chloride, zinc proteinate, iron proteinate, copper proteinate, manganese proteinate, calcium iodate)9.6% estimated
- 6. vitamins: (vitamin E supplement, niacin, vitamin A supplement, thiamine mononitrate, riboflavin, biotin, vitamin B12 supplement, folic acid, vitamin D3 supplement, d-calcium pantothenate)9.1% estimated
- 7. taurine8.6% estimated
- 8. kale8.0% estimated
- 9. blueberries7.5% estimated
- 10. cranberries7.0% estimated
- 11. coconut6.4% estimated
Nutrition and feedingProtein 8% · Fat 8%
Guaranteed analysis (as fed)
| Nutrient | As fed |
|---|---|
| Protein | 8% |
| Fat | 8% |
| Fibre | 0.20% |
| Ash | 2% |
| Moisture | 74% |
| Calcium | 0.30% |
| Phosphorus | 0.30% |
Energy: 91.2 kcal/100g
Additives & feeding info
Feeding and storage
Feeding guide
Adult Dog – 1 can per 9kg/20lb of body weight per day; Puppy – up to twice the amount of an Adult Dog; Gestation and Lactation – up to three times the amount of an Adult Dog
Additives declared on the label
Nutritional additives
Zinc proteinate; Iron proteinate; Copper proteinate; Manganese proteinate; Calcium iodate; Vitamin E supplement; Niacin; Vitamin A supplement; Thiamine mononitrate; Riboflavin; Biotin; Vitamin B12 supplement; Folic acid; Vitamin D3 supplement; D-calcium pantothenate; Choline chloride
Trust and sourceNo recalls recorded in our database · checked 2026-09-19
Brand and contact: Riplee's Ranch
- Website
- https://ripleesranch.com/
Trust and provenance
- Recall history
- No recalls recorded in our database
- Label data last checked
- 2026-09-19
- Scored with
- Model v3 (methodology)
- Product page
- ripleesranch.com
Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.
Brand and retailer reviews
External platform ratings are not scores for this individual recipe.
Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.
Score details and methodologyCalculations, history and evidence
Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated
Why this score?
The food scored 53 out of 100. Ingredients without printed percentages pulled the score down by -10.6, while the overall quality of the ingredient list lifted it by +4.2. Being labelled nutritionally complete added a further +2.3 points, and the additive load took off -1.7.
Scored with model v3 on 2026-10-25. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.5 | 9.191 | +4.22 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 8.3% | -0.115 | -0.96 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 3.4% | -0.005 | -0.02 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 8.3% | 0.163 | +1.35 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 70.0% | -0.012 | -0.85 |
| Recipe graded poor | 12.9% | -0.065 | -0.84 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 2 | -0.876 | -1.75 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 6.5% | 0.060 | +0.39 |
| Undeclared quantities | 100.0% | -0.106 | -10.56 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | yes | -3.158 | -3.16 |
| Additive penalty | -7.75 | 0.222 | -1.72 |
| Processing multiplier | 1.00 | 33.786 | +33.79 |
| Processing: Wet Pate | yes | -0.672 | -0.67 |
Show all 40 components
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.5 | 9.191 | +4.22 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 0.0% | 0.096 | +0.00 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 8.3% | -0.115 | -0.96 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.092 | +0.00 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 3.4% | -0.005 | -0.02 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 8.3% | 0.163 | +1.35 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 70.0% | -0.012 | -0.85 |
| Other share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.375 | +0.00 |
| Unrecognised share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.027 | +0.00 |
| Recipe graded poor | 12.9% | -0.065 | -0.84 |
| Poor-quality meat in recipe | 0.0% | -0.179 | +0.00 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 2 | -0.876 | -1.75 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 6.5% | 0.060 | +0.39 |
| Undeclared quantities | 100.0% | -0.106 | -10.56 |
| Prints ingredient percentages | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| Frozen or chilled fresh | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| High meat (30%+ of dry matter) | no | 0.707 | +0.00 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | yes | -3.158 | -3.16 |
| High carb and low meat | no | -1.180 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × printed percentages | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × fresh | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Fresh × high meat | 0.0 | 11.084 | +0.00 |
| Additive penalty | -7.75 | 0.222 | -1.72 |
| Processing multiplier | 1.00 | 33.786 | +33.79 |
| Processing: Raw | no | -0.054 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Chilled | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Frozen | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Refrigerated | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Shelf | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Freeze Dried | no | 6.629 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Air Dried | no | 6.331 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Cold Pressed | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Baked | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Semi Moist | no | -6.174 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Muesli | no | -10.146 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Pate | yes | -0.672 | -0.67 |
| Processing: Wet Chunks | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
- Processing-type offset
- -0.08
- Additives declared on label
- +1 transparency bonus
- Subtotal
- 53.3
- Final score
- 53/100
Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.
Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges
How the declared analysis compares with FEDIAF reference ranges for adult dogs. The label prints as-fed values; we convert to a dry-matter basis before scoring, and the bands are dry-matter ranges. Scores rise to 100 at the band midpoint: the reference is adequacy, not maximisation. Nutrients with a published upper limit taper again above it; fat is policed through calorie density rather than a direct penalty.
Guaranteed-analysis FEDIAF score: crude minimums and maximums are bounds, not typical values; moisture (a maximum) uses the processing median where available; experimental US score.
| Nutrient | As fed (label) | Dry matter (scored) | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| Protein | 8 | 30.8 (band 18 to 40%) | 100 |
| Fat | 8 | 30.8 (band 5.5 to 20%) | 100 |
| Fibre | 0.2 | 0.8 (band 0.5 to 5%) | 73.6 |
| Calcium | 0.3 | 1.2 (band 0.5 to 2.5%) | 89.6 |
| Phosphorus | 0.3 | 1.2 (band 0.4 to 1.6%) | 100 |
| Calcium:phosphorus ratio | 1 | 1 (band 1 to 2%) | 70 |
| Energy (kcal/100g) | 91.2 | 350.8 | 100 |
Scored over 7 declared nutrients (combined weight 90); undeclared nutrients do not affect the score.
Declared fortification: 16 nutritional additives on the label
- Zinc proteinate
- Iron proteinate
- Copper proteinate
- Manganese proteinate
- Calcium iodate
- Vitamin E supplement
- Niacin
- Vitamin A supplement
- Thiamine mononitrate
- Riboflavin
- Biotin
- Vitamin B12 supplement
- Folic acid
- Vitamin D3 supplement
- D-calcium pantothenate
- Choline chloride
Medium confidence: the full five-part analysis is on file; where moisture was not declared it was estimated from the food type.
This measures agreement with published reference ranges, not suitability for an individual dog. For medical conditions, follow veterinary guidance.
Transparency: what the label discloses
How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.
| Item | Points |
|---|---|
| Ingredient list on the label (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Printed percentages on the label (voluntary) - not on file | 0/20 |
| Analytical constituents declared (mandatory) | 15/15 |
| Additives declared (mandatory) | 5/10 |
| Energy value declared (voluntary) | 5/5 |
| Complete/complementary designation (mandatory) | 5/5 |
| Feeding guidance given (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory) | 5/10 |
| Country of manufacture stated (voluntary) | 10/10 |
| Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file | 0/5 |
Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Batch and date labelling).
Safety: recall history
Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.
No recalls recorded in our database.
Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it
The claims made on the pack and product page, checked against the declared label. We record claims as stated; "consistent" means our stored label data supports the claim, "contradicted" means it conflicts with it. Functional claims are recorded but never scored.
Claims on file; none we can check against the label
| Claim | Type | Check | Substantiation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Holistic Nutrition (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Whole-body health for your pet (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Formulated to meet the nutritional levels established by the AAFCO (on pack) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Regionally sourced ingredients (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Grain Free (on pack) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| 96% free run turkey (on pack) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Family-Owned Since 1995 (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.
Alternatives to Turkey Recipe Canned Dog Food
Similar on ingredients, protein, format or nutrition, using the same stored data.
Community0 comments
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.