Red Dog Blue Kat Reef n' Beef Frozen Raw Recipe
Fresh Frozen · completeHigh meat
Our verdict
Is Red Dog Blue Kat Reef n' Beef Frozen Raw Recipe a good dog food?
We score it 59/100 (Average). This reflects the ingredient quality, composition and label transparency of the recipe as declared on the label.
100% of this recipe has no printed percentage. Estimated shares are model estimates, not label facts.
Who is this food for?
Suits
- Labelled by the manufacturer for adult dogs
- Labelling or feeding guide is aimed at small dogs
- Grain-free: no grain ingredients listed
- Doesn't list chicken, turkey, lamb, venison, pork, duck as ingredients
Consider something else if:
- Your dog avoids beef: the label lists beef heart
- Your dog avoids fish: the label lists salmon
- You want a single-protein recipe: this one lists more than one animal protein
These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Find foods that fit your dog.
Ingredients (11)100% of the recipe is estimated
Estimated composition
- meat 53.5%
- veg 46.5%
| # | As declared | Matched | Label reading | Declared % | Est. % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Wild-caught salmon | Salmon | meat · good | - | 11.8 |
| 2 | beef heart | Beef Heart | meat · good | - | 11.2 |
| 3 | beef muscle meat | Beef muscle meat | meat · good | - | 10.7 |
| 4 | beef liver | Beef Liver | meat · good | - | 10.2 |
| 5 | beef kidney | Beef Kidney | meat · good | - | 9.6 |
| 6 | celery | Celery Seeds | veg · good | - | 9.1 |
| 7 | blueberries | Blueberries | veg · good | - | 8.6 |
| 8 | bok choy | Bok Choy | veg · good | - | 8.0 |
| 9 | butternut squash | Butternut Squash | veg · good | - | 7.5 |
| 10 | sunflower seeds | Sunflower Seeds | veg · good | - | 7.0 |
| 11 | and kelp powder. | Kelp | veg · good | - | 6.4 |
- 1. Wild-caught salmon11.8% estimated
- 2. beef heart11.2% estimated
- 3. beef muscle meat10.7% estimated
- 4. beef liver10.2% estimated
- 5. beef kidney9.6% estimated
- 6. celery9.1% estimated
- 7. blueberries8.6% estimated
- 8. bok choy8.0% estimated
- 9. butternut squash7.5% estimated
- 10. sunflower seeds7.0% estimated
- 11. and kelp powder.6.4% estimated
Nutrition and feedingProtein 14.40% · Fat 9.70%
Declared analysis (as fed)
| Nutrient | As fed |
|---|---|
| Protein | 14.40% |
| Fat | 9.70% |
| Fibre | 0.60% |
| Ash | 2.20% |
| Moisture | 70.90% |
Energy: 156 kcal/100g
Additives & feeding info
Feeding and storage
Storage
Keep product frozen until ready to use. Defrost package in a leak-proof container and leave in the refrigerator for 24 hours, or until soft through. Poultry should not be kept longer than 2 days. Red meats & fish should not be kept longer than 3 days.
Feeding guide
Puppy 6-10%, Small Breed 3-5%, Athlete 4-6%, Adult 2-4%, Senior 2-3% of body weight. Puppy supplement recommendations include kosher/Himalayan sea salt (sodium), cashew/almond butter (magnesium), dehydrated liver treats, canned sardines and oysters (iron/zinc), and organic eggs, ground pumpkin seeds and cashew butter (zinc).
No additives recorded yet.
Trust and sourceNo recalls recorded in our database · checked 2026-09-19
Brand and contact: Red Dog Blue Kat
- Phone
- 1-866-WHY-RAWW | 604-987-2166
- Address
- Red Dog Blue Kat warehouse proudly located in Port Coquitlam, BC, Canada
- Contact page
- www.reddogbluekat.com
Trust and provenance
- Recall history
- No recalls recorded in our database
- Label data last checked
- 2026-09-19
- Scored with
- Model v3 (methodology)
- Product page
- www.reddogbluekat.com
Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.
Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.
Score details and methodologyCalculations, history and evidence
Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated
Why this score?
The overall score is 59 out of 100. Undeclared ingredient shares, meaning ingredients without printed percentages, contributed -10.6 points, while the overall quality of the ingredient list contributed +9 points. The processing format contributed -2.4 points, and the vegetable and fruit content contributed -0.3 points.
Scored with model v3 on 2026-10-25. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 1.0 | 9.191 | +8.96 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 53.2% | -0.005 | -0.27 |
| Undeclared quantities | 100.0% | -0.106 | -10.56 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | yes | -3.158 | -3.16 |
| Processing multiplier | 1.10 | 33.786 | +37.16 |
| Processing: Fresh Frozen | yes | -2.354 | -2.35 |
Show all 40 components
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 1.0 | 9.191 | +8.96 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 0.0% | 0.096 | +0.00 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.115 | +0.00 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.092 | +0.00 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 53.2% | -0.005 | -0.27 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 0.0% | 0.163 | +0.00 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.012 | +0.00 |
| Other share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.375 | +0.00 |
| Unrecognised share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.027 | +0.00 |
| Recipe graded poor | 0.0% | -0.065 | +0.00 |
| Poor-quality meat in recipe | 0.0% | -0.179 | +0.00 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 0 | -0.876 | +0.00 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 0.0% | 0.060 | +0.00 |
| Undeclared quantities | 100.0% | -0.106 | -10.56 |
| Prints ingredient percentages | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Complete diet | no | 2.294 | +0.00 |
| Frozen or chilled fresh | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| High meat (30%+ of dry matter) | no | 0.707 | +0.00 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | yes | -3.158 | -3.16 |
| High carb and low meat | no | -1.180 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × printed percentages | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × fresh | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Fresh × high meat | 0.0 | 11.084 | +0.00 |
| Additive penalty | 0.00 | 0.222 | +0.00 |
| Processing multiplier | 1.10 | 33.786 | +37.16 |
| Processing: Raw | no | -0.054 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Chilled | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Frozen | yes | -2.354 | -2.35 |
| Processing: Fresh Refrigerated | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Shelf | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Freeze Dried | no | 6.629 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Air Dried | no | 6.331 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Cold Pressed | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Baked | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Semi Moist | no | -6.174 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Muesli | no | -10.146 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Pate | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Chunks | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
- Processing-type offset
- -1.74
- Subtotal
- 58.9
- Final score
- 59/100
Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.
Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges
How the declared analysis compares with FEDIAF reference ranges for adult dogs. The label prints as-fed values; we convert to a dry-matter basis before scoring, and the bands are dry-matter ranges. Scores rise to 100 at the band midpoint: the reference is adequacy, not maximisation. Nutrients with a published upper limit taper again above it; fat is policed through calorie density rather than a direct penalty.
Guaranteed-analysis FEDIAF score: crude minimums and maximums are bounds, not typical values; moisture (a maximum) uses the processing median where available; experimental US score.
| Nutrient | As fed (label) | Dry matter (scored) | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| Protein | 14.4 | 49.5 (band 24.123711340206192 to 40%) | 100 |
| Fat | 9.7 | 33.3 (band 7.371134020618559 to 20%) | 100 |
| Fibre | 0.6 | 2.1 (band 0.5 to 5%) | 90.8 |
| Energy (kcal/100g) | 156 | 536.1 | 100 |
Scored over 4 declared nutrients (combined weight 60); undeclared nutrients do not affect the score.
No nutritional additives section declared on the label.
Medium confidence: the full five-part analysis is on file; where moisture was not declared it was estimated from the food type.
This measures agreement with published reference ranges, not suitability for an individual dog. For medical conditions, follow veterinary guidance.
Transparency: what the label discloses
How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.
| Item | Points |
|---|---|
| Ingredient list on the label (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Printed percentages on the label (voluntary) - not on file | 0/20 |
| Analytical constituents declared (mandatory) | 15/15 |
| Additives declared (mandatory) - not on file | 0/10 |
| Energy value declared (voluntary) | 5/5 |
| Complete/complementary designation (mandatory) | 5/5 |
| Feeding guidance given (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Country of manufacture stated (voluntary) | 10/10 |
| Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file | 0/5 |
Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Additives declared, Batch and date labelling).
Safety: recall history
Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.
No recalls recorded in our database.
Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it
The claims made on the pack and product page, checked against the declared label. We record claims as stated; "consistent" means our stored label data supports the claim, "contradicted" means it conflicts with it. Functional claims are recorded but never scored.
100/100 · moderate — 1 checkable claim: 1 consistent, 0 contradicted.
Consistent with the label
- "Complete nutrition for adult dogs" — supported by the declared complete and balanced data.
7 further claims on file that we cannot check against the label.
Moderate: every checkable claim is consistent with the declared label.
| Claim | Type | Check | Substantiation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sous-vide cooking friendly (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Suitable for puppies when fed in rotation (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Natural supplements (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Farm fresh vegetables (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Complete nutrition for adult dogs (on page) | Content | consistent | Manufacturer assertion |
| Grass-fed beef, & wild-caught Pacific salmon (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Human-grade ingredients (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| COMPLETE & BALANCED... formulated to meet the nutritional levels established by the AAFCO Dog Food Nutrient Profiles for maintenance (on page) | Nutrient | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.
Alternatives to Reef n' Beef Frozen Raw Recipe
Similar on ingredients, protein, format or nutrition, using the same stored data.
Community0 comments
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.