Lily & Jax Recette avec dinde
Dry Extruded · complete
Our verdict
Is Lily & Jax Recette avec dinde a good dog food?
We score it 44/100 (Poor). The main reasons are set out in "Why you might not" below, and every step of the calculation is shown under "How we calculated this score".
100% of this recipe has no printed percentage. Estimated shares are model estimates, not label facts.
Who is this food for?
Suits
- Labelled by the manufacturer for all lifestages
- Doesn't list beef, lamb, venison, pork, duck as ingredients
Consider something else if:
- Your dog avoids chicken: the label lists dried chicken protein
- Your dog avoids turkey: the label lists turkey
- Your dog avoids fish: the label lists green-lipped mussel
- Your dog avoids grain: the label lists oats
- You want a single-protein recipe: this one lists more than one animal protein
These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Find foods that fit your dog.
Ingredients (38)100% of the recipe is estimated
Estimated composition
- supplement 53.1%
- unknown 17.4%
- carb 6.9%
- meat 6.9%
- fibre 6.5%
- veg 6.2%
- additive 3.0%
| # | As declared | Matched | Label reading | Declared % | Est. % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Chicken meal | Dried chicken protein | meat · good | - | 3.5 |
| 2 | oats | Oats | carb · medium | - | 3.4 |
| 3 | peas | Peas | veg · good | - | 3.4 |
| 4 | deboned turkey | Turkey | meat · medium | - | 3.3 |
| 5 | hulled barley | Pearled Barley | carb · medium | - | 3.3 |
| 6 | chicken fat preserved with mixed tocopherols | Tocopherols | additive · good | - | 3.2 |
| 7 | dried citrus pulp | Citrus Pulp | fibre · medium | - | 3.2 |
| 8 | alfalfa meal | Alfalfa Meal | fibre · medium | - | 3.2 |
| 9 | natural flavour | Smoked Flavour | additive · poor | - | 3.1 |
| 10 | monocalcium phosphate | Monocalcium phosphate | supplement · good | - | 3.1 |
| 11 | lecithin | Lecithin | supplement · good | - | 3.0 |
| 12 | menhaden oil | unmatched | - | - | 3.0 |
| 13 | salt | Salt | additive · poor | - | 2.9 |
| 14 | choline chloride | Choline | supplement · good | - | 2.9 |
| 15 | calcium carbonate | Calcium Carbonate | supplement · medium | - | 2.8 |
| 16 | ferrous sulphate | Iron sulfate | supplement · good | - | 2.8 |
| 17 | alpha-tocopherol acetate (a source of vitamin E) | Vitamin E | supplement · good | - | 2.7 |
| 18 | zinc oxide | Zinc Oxide | supplement · good | - | 2.7 |
| 19 | whey powder | Sweet whey powder | other · medium | - | 2.7 |
| 20 | rosemary extract | Rosemary | veg · good | - | 2.6 |
| 21 | pumpkin | Pumpkin | veg · good | - | 2.6 |
| 22 | New Zealand green-lipped mussel | Green-Lipped Mussel | supplement · good | - | 2.5 |
| 23 | manganous oxide | Manganese (II) Oxide | supplement · good | - | 2.5 |
| 24 | niacin | Niacin | supplement · good | - | 2.4 |
| 25 | d-calcium pantothenate | Calcium pantothenate | supplement · good | - | 2.4 |
| 26 | zinc proteinate | Zinc Proteinate | supplement · good | - | 2.3 |
| 27 | vitamin A supplement | Vitamin A | supplement · good | - | 2.3 |
| 28 | cholecalciferol (a source of vitamin D3) | Vitamin D3 supplement | supplement · good | - | 2.2 |
| 29 | thiamine mononitrate | Thiamine mononitrate | supplement · good | - | 2.2 |
| 30 | manganese proteinate | Manganese proteinate | supplement · good | - | 2.2 |
| 31 | biotin | Biotin | supplement · good | - | 2.1 |
| 32 | sodium selenite | Sodium selenite | supplement · poor | - | 2.1 |
| 33 | riboflavin | Riboflavin | supplement · good | - | 2.0 |
| 34 | copper proteinate | Copper proteinate | supplement · good | - | 2.0 |
| 35 | pyridoxine hydrochloride | Pyridoxine hydrochloride | supplement · good | - | 1.9 |
| 36 | vitamin B12 supplement | Vitamin B12 | supplement · good | - | 1.9 |
| 37 | calcium iodate | Calcium iodate | supplement · medium | - | 1.8 |
| 38 | folic acid | Folic acid | supplement · good | - | 1.8 |
- 1. Chicken meal3.5% estimated
- 2. oats3.4% estimated
- 3. peas3.4% estimated
- 4. deboned turkey3.3% estimated
- 5. hulled barley3.3% estimated
- 6. chicken fat preserved with mixed tocopherols3.2% estimated
- 7. dried citrus pulp3.2% estimated
- 8. alfalfa meal3.2% estimated
- 9. natural flavour3.1% estimated
- 10. monocalcium phosphate3.1% estimated
- 11. lecithin3.0% estimated
- 12. menhaden oil3.0% estimated
- 13. salt2.9% estimated
- 14. choline chloride2.9% estimated
- 15. calcium carbonate2.8% estimated
- 16. ferrous sulphate2.8% estimated
- 17. alpha-tocopherol acetate (a source of vitamin E)2.7% estimated
- 18. zinc oxide2.7% estimated
- 19. whey powder2.7% estimated
- 20. rosemary extract2.6% estimated
- 21. pumpkin2.6% estimated
- 22. New Zealand green-lipped mussel2.5% estimated
- 23. manganous oxide2.5% estimated
- 24. niacin2.4% estimated
- 25. d-calcium pantothenate2.4% estimated
- 26. zinc proteinate2.3% estimated
- 27. vitamin A supplement2.3% estimated
- 28. cholecalciferol (a source of vitamin D3)2.2% estimated
- 29. thiamine mononitrate2.2% estimated
- 30. manganese proteinate2.2% estimated
- 31. biotin2.1% estimated
- 32. sodium selenite2.1% estimated
- 33. riboflavin2.0% estimated
- 34. copper proteinate2.0% estimated
- 35. pyridoxine hydrochloride1.9% estimated
- 36. vitamin B12 supplement1.9% estimated
- 37. calcium iodate1.8% estimated
- 38. folic acid1.8% estimated
Nutrition and feedingProtein 25% · Fat 15%
Declared analysis (as fed)
| Nutrient | As fed |
|---|---|
| Protein | 25% |
| Fat | 15% |
| Fibre | 6% |
| Ash | 7.50% |
| Moisture | 10% |
| Calcium | 1.15% |
| Phosphorus | 0.92% |
| Sodium | 0.30% |
Additives & feeding info
No additives recorded yet.
Trust and sourceNo recalls recorded in our database · checked 2026-09-19
Brand and contact: Lily & Jax
- Website
- https://www.lilyandjax.com/
- Address
- Boucherville, Québec, Canada
Trust and provenance
- Recall history
- No recalls recorded in our database
- Label data last checked
- 2026-09-19
- Scored with
- Model v3 (methodology)
- Product page
- www.lilyandjax.com
Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.
Brand and retailer reviews
External platform ratings are not scores for this individual recipe.
Trustpilot: 2.9/5 · 61 reviews
Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.
Score details and methodologyCalculations, history and evidence
Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated
Why this score?
This recipe achieves a final score of 44 out of 100 based on several key factors. The overall quality of the ingredient list added +4.7 points. However, ingredients without printed percentages reduced the score by -10.6. Additionally, the processing format deducted -6.7 and the carbohydrate content contributed -0.9.
Scored with model v3 on 2026-10-25. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.5 | 9.191 | +4.75 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 8.1% | -0.115 | -0.93 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 1.2% | -0.005 | -0.01 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 3.6% | 0.163 | +0.59 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 65.1% | -0.012 | -0.79 |
| Unrecognised share of dry matter | 11.6% | -0.027 | -0.31 |
| Recipe graded poor | 5.2% | -0.065 | -0.34 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 2 | -0.876 | -1.75 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 3.0% | 0.060 | +0.18 |
| Undeclared quantities | 100.0% | -0.106 | -10.56 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | yes | -3.158 | -3.16 |
| Additive penalty | -3.71 | 0.222 | -0.82 |
| Processing multiplier | 0.98 | 33.786 | +33.11 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | yes | -6.713 | -6.71 |
Show all 40 components
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.5 | 9.191 | +4.75 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 0.0% | 0.096 | +0.00 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 8.1% | -0.115 | -0.93 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.092 | +0.00 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 1.2% | -0.005 | -0.01 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 3.6% | 0.163 | +0.59 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 65.1% | -0.012 | -0.79 |
| Other share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.375 | +0.00 |
| Unrecognised share of dry matter | 11.6% | -0.027 | -0.31 |
| Recipe graded poor | 5.2% | -0.065 | -0.34 |
| Poor-quality meat in recipe | 0.0% | -0.179 | +0.00 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 2 | -0.876 | -1.75 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 3.0% | 0.060 | +0.18 |
| Undeclared quantities | 100.0% | -0.106 | -10.56 |
| Prints ingredient percentages | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Complete diet | no | 2.294 | +0.00 |
| Frozen or chilled fresh | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| High meat (30%+ of dry matter) | no | 0.707 | +0.00 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | yes | -3.158 | -3.16 |
| High carb and low meat | no | -1.180 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × printed percentages | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × fresh | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Fresh × high meat | 0.0 | 11.084 | +0.00 |
| Additive penalty | -3.71 | 0.222 | -0.82 |
| Processing multiplier | 0.98 | 33.786 | +33.11 |
| Processing: Raw | no | -0.054 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Chilled | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Frozen | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Refrigerated | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Shelf | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Freeze Dried | no | 6.629 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Air Dried | no | 6.331 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Cold Pressed | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Baked | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | yes | -6.713 | -6.71 |
| Processing: Dry Semi Moist | no | -6.174 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Muesli | no | -10.146 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Pate | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Chunks | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
- Processing-type offset
- +0.02
- Subtotal
- 44.2
- Final score
- 44/100
Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.
Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges
How the declared analysis compares with FEDIAF reference ranges for adult dogs. The label prints as-fed values; we convert to a dry-matter basis before scoring, and the bands are dry-matter ranges. Scores rise to 100 at the band midpoint: the reference is adequacy, not maximisation. Nutrients with a published upper limit taper again above it; fat is policed through calorie density rather than a direct penalty.
Guaranteed-analysis FEDIAF score: crude minimums and maximums are bounds, not typical values; moisture (a maximum) uses the processing median where available; experimental US score.
| Nutrient | As fed (label) | Dry matter (scored) | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| Protein | 25 | 27.6 (band 18 to 40%) | 96.2 |
| Fat | 15 | 16.6 (band 5.5 to 20%) | 100 |
| Fibre | 6 | 6.6 (band 0.5 to 5%) | 100 |
| Calcium | 1.15 | 1.3 (band 0.5 to 2.5%) | 93.1 |
| Phosphorus | 0.92 | 1 (band 0.4 to 1.6%) | 100 |
| Sodium | 0.3 | 0.3 (band 0.1+%) | 100 |
| Calcium:phosphorus ratio | 1.2 | 1.2 (band 1 to 2%) | 85 |
Scored over 7 declared nutrients (combined weight 85); undeclared nutrients do not affect the score. Moisture was not declared and was estimated at 9.5% from the food type.
No nutritional additives section declared on the label.
Low confidence: partial analysis or moisture estimated from the food type.
This measures agreement with published reference ranges, not suitability for an individual dog. For medical conditions, follow veterinary guidance.
Transparency: what the label discloses
How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.
| Item | Points |
|---|---|
| Ingredient list on the label (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Printed percentages on the label (voluntary) - not on file | 0/20 |
| Analytical constituents declared (mandatory) | 15/15 |
| Additives declared (mandatory) - not on file | 0/10 |
| Energy value declared (voluntary) - not on file | 0/5 |
| Complete/complementary designation (mandatory) | 5/5 |
| Feeding guidance given (mandatory) - not on file | 0/10 |
| Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Country of manufacture stated (voluntary) | 10/10 |
| Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file | 0/5 |
Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Additives declared, Feeding guidance given, Batch and date labelling).
Safety: recall history
Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.
No recalls recorded in our database.
Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it
The claims made on the pack and product page, checked against the declared label. We record claims as stated; "consistent" means our stored label data supports the claim, "contradicted" means it conflicts with it. Functional claims are recorded but never scored.
Claims on file; none we can check against the label
| Claim | Type | Check | Substantiation |
|---|---|---|---|
| nourriture complète et équilibrée, remplie d'ingrédients sains et naturels (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Cette recette est formulée pour satisfaire aux niveaux nutritionnels établis selon les profils de l'AAFCO pour tous les stades de vie des chiens, incluant les chiots de grande race (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Cette recette contient de la dinde fraîche et désossée du Canada. (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| SANS MAÏS, SOYA OU BLÉ (on page) | Free-from | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| INGRÉDIENTS D'AGRICULTURE SANS OGM (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| ENRICHIES DE VITAMINES ET MINÉRAUX (on page) | Nutrient | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.
Alternatives to Recette avec dinde
Similar on ingredients, protein, format or nutrition, using the same stored data.
Community0 comments
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.