Harlow Blend ® Oven Baked Cranberry Crunch Dog Treats

Treat complementary

This is a treat, not a complete diet. The 1–100 rating applies to complete foods, so it isn't scored. Ingredient breakdown below.

Is Harlow Blend ® Oven Baked Cranberry Crunch Dog Treats a good dog food?

This is a treat, not a complete diet, so it is not scored on our 1-100 scale. The ingredient breakdown below shows what is in it; a treat should be fed alongside, not instead of, a complete diet.

How we score

Only part of the analytical constituents are declared, so the nutritional picture is incomplete.

100% of this recipe has no printed percentage. Estimated shares are model estimates, not label facts.

Recipe
Not applicable
Nutritional
Not applicable
Transparency
50
Safety
100
Evidence
Not recorded

Why you might choose it

Single named animal protein: insect.
Doesn't list grain ingredients.

Why you might not

A treat, not a complete diet: feed as an extra, not the whole diet.
100% of the recipe mass has no printed percentage, so the exact split cannot be verified.
Its additive load costs about 5 points in the rating.

View the source page

What the label tells us

The label lists 13 ingredients.
Names its animal sources (1 named ingredient).
Every animal ingredient is a named source.
Lists no artificial colours or preservatives.
Prints no ingredient quantities.

Why is this treat not scored?

Our 1 to 100 rating applies to complete diets, so treats and complementary foods are presented as what the label tells us rather than a number that would invite comparison with complete meals.

What should I look for on a treat label?

A short ingredient list, named animal sources instead of generic terms, and no artificial colours or preservatives. Printed quantities are a good transparency signal, though few treat labels provide them.

These points are derived from the published ingredient list, not a rating.

Estimated composition

veg46.5%

additive20.0%

carb9.6%

meat9.2%

oil8.8%

supplement5.8%

Typical analysis (as fed)

Protein: 12%
Fat: 18%
Fibre: 9%
Moisture: 20%

Additives & feeding info

Technological additives

Mixed Tocopherols

Feeding guide

Pet Weight | Daily Feeding: 1-3 daily (chart truncated on page)

Who is this food for?

Suits

Labelled by the manufacturer for all lifestages
Grain-free: no grain ingredients listed
Single named protein: insect
Doesn't list chicken, beef, turkey, lamb, fish, venison, pork, duck as ingredients

These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Use the homepage filter to find foods that fit your dog.

Ingredients (13)

#	As declared	Matched	Category	Tier	Declared %	Est. %
1	Apple Sauce	Apples	veg	good	-	10.0
2	Coconut Flour	Coconut Flour	carb	medium	-	9.6
3	Cricket Flour	Insects	meat	good	-	9.2
4	Coconut Oil	Coconut Oil	oil	medium	-	8.8
5	Ground Chia	Chia Seeds	veg	good	-	8.5
6	Cinnamon	Cinnamon	veg	good	-	8.1
7	Salt	Salt	additive	medium	-	7.7
8	Cranberry	Cranberries	veg	good	-	7.3
9	Sodium Bicarbonate	Sodium Bicarbonate	additive	medium	-	6.9
10	Ground Ginger	Ginger	veg	good	-	6.5
11	Ground Pumpkin	Pumpkin	veg	good	-	6.2
12	Mono Calcium Phosphate	Monocalcium phosphate	supplement	good	-	5.8
13	Mixed Tocopherols.	Tocopherols	additive	good	-	5.4

Brand

Website: https://harlowblend.com/
Email: [email protected]
Phone: +1 (833) 468-9888
Address: 2275 Upper Middle Road, Unit #101 Oakville, ON, Canada L6H 0C3
Contact page: harlowblend.com

Trust and provenance

Recall history: No recalls recorded in our database
Label data last checked: 2026-09-19
Product page: harlowblend.com

Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.

Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.

Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated

Scored with model v3 on 2026-09-26. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.

Component	Input	Coefficient	Contribution
Base score	-	30.909	+30.91
Average ingredient quality	0.8	9.191	+7.15
Carb share of dry matter	11.8%	-0.115	-1.35
Oil share of dry matter	11.9%	-0.092	-1.10
Vegetable share of dry matter	33.0%	-0.005	-0.17
Additive share of dry matter	24.5%	0.163	+3.99
Supplement share of dry matter	7.2%	-0.012	-0.09
Undeclared quantities	100.0%	-0.106	-10.56
Low meat (under 10% of dry matter)	yes	-3.158	-3.16
Additive penalty	-24.15	0.222	-5.36
Processing multiplier	0.98	33.786	+33.11
Processing: Dry Baked	yes	-6.713	-6.71

Show all 40 components

Component	Input	Coefficient	Contribution
Base score	-	30.909	+30.91
Average ingredient quality	0.8	9.191	+7.15
Meat share of dry matter	0.0%	0.096	+0.00
Carb share of dry matter	11.8%	-0.115	-1.35
Oil share of dry matter	11.9%	-0.092	-1.10
Vegetable share of dry matter	33.0%	-0.005	-0.17
Additive share of dry matter	24.5%	0.163	+3.99
Supplement share of dry matter	7.2%	-0.012	-0.09
Other share of dry matter	0.0%	-0.375	+0.00
Unrecognised share of dry matter	0.0%	-0.027	+0.00
Recipe graded poor	0.0%	-0.065	+0.00
Poor-quality meat in recipe	0.0%	-0.179	+0.00
Number of poor ingredients	0	-0.876	+0.00
Largest single poor ingredient	0.0%	0.060	+0.00
Undeclared quantities	100.0%	-0.106	-10.56
Prints ingredient percentages	no	0.000	+0.00
Complete diet	no	2.294	+0.00
Frozen or chilled fresh	no	0.000	+0.00
High meat (30%+ of dry matter)	no	0.707	+0.00
Low meat (under 10% of dry matter)	yes	-3.158	-3.16
High carb and low meat	no	-1.180	+0.00
Meat share × printed percentages	0.0	0.000	+0.00
Meat share × fresh	0.0	0.000	+0.00
Fresh × high meat	0.0	11.084	+0.00
Additive penalty	-24.15	0.222	-5.36
Processing multiplier	0.98	33.786	+33.11
Processing: Raw	no	-0.054	+0.00
Processing: Fresh Chilled	no	-2.354	+0.00
Processing: Fresh Frozen	no	-2.354	+0.00
Processing: Fresh Refrigerated	no	0.000	+0.00
Processing: Fresh Shelf	no	-0.672	+0.00
Processing: Dry Freeze Dried	no	6.629	+0.00
Processing: Dry Air Dried	no	6.331	+0.00
Processing: Dry Cold Pressed	no	-6.713	+0.00
Processing: Dry Baked	yes	-6.713	-6.71
Processing: Dry Extruded	no	-6.713	+0.00
Processing: Dry Semi Moist	no	-6.174	+0.00
Processing: Dry Muesli	no	-10.146	+0.00
Processing: Wet Pate	no	-0.672	+0.00
Processing: Wet Chunks	no	-0.672	+0.00

Processing-type offset: +0.02
Additives declared on label: +1 transparency bonus
Subtotal: 47.7
Final score: 48/100

Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.

This is not a complete diet, so the 1-100 rating does not apply to it. Read the recipe breakdown above as ingredient-quality context only.

Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges

Not applicable to complementary food. FEDIAF reference ranges apply to complete diets.

Transparency: what the label discloses

How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.

Item	Points
✓ Ingredient list on the label (mandatory)	10/10
✗ Printed percentages on the label (voluntary) - not on file	0/20
✗ Analytical constituents declared (mandatory) - not on file	0/15
✓ Additives declared (mandatory)	5/10
✗ Energy value declared (voluntary) - not on file	0/5
✓ Complete/complementary designation (mandatory)	5/5
✓ Feeding guidance given (mandatory)	10/10
✓ Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory)	10/10
✓ Country of manufacture stated (voluntary)	10/10
✗ Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file	0/5

Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Analytical constituents declared, Batch and date labelling).

Safety: recall history

Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.

No recalls recorded in our database.

Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it

The claims made on the pack and product page, checked against the declared label. We record claims as stated; "consistent" means our stored label data supports the claim, "contradicted" means it conflicts with it. Functional claims are recorded but never scored.

Claims on file; none we can check against the label

Claim	Type	Check	Substantiation
Sustainable, Highly Digestible Cricket Protein (on page)	provenance	not checkable	Manufacturer assertion
Gently Oven Baked (on page)	Functional	not checkable	Manufacturer assertion
Helps Retain the Nutritional Value and Natural Flavour of Carefully Selected Ingredients (on page)	Functional	not checkable	Manufacturer assertion
Crunchy Texture Dogs Love (on page)	Functional	not checkable	Manufacturer assertion
Supports Urinary Tract Health (on page)	Functional	not checkable	Manufacturer assertion
Helps Reduce the Adhesion of Certain Bacteria to the Urinary Tract (on page)	Functional	not checkable	Manufacturer assertion
Naturally Rich in Essential Amino Acids (on page)	High/low level	not checkable	Manufacturer assertion
Source of Beneficial Essential Fatty Acids (on page)	Nutrient	not checkable	Manufacturer assertion
Contains Natural Prebiotic Fibre to Support Gut Health (on page)	Nutrient	not checkable	Manufacturer assertion
No Artificial Colours, Flavours or Preservatives (on page)	Free-from	not checkable	Manufacturer assertion
Made with sustainable cricket protein, cranberries, pumpkin, and functional ingredients (on page)	Content	not checkable	Manufacturer assertion
Natural Source of Fibre (on page)	Nutrient	not checkable	Manufacturer assertion
Made without artificial colours, flavours, or preservatives (on page)	Free-from	not checkable	Manufacturer assertion