Our verdict
Is Faim Museau Poulet a good dog food?
We score it 58/100 (Average). This reflects the ingredient quality, composition and label transparency of the recipe as declared on the label.
Only part of the analytical constituents are declared, so the nutritional picture is incomplete.
100% of this recipe has no printed percentage. Estimated shares are model estimates, not label facts.
Who is this food for?
Suits
- Labelled by the manufacturer for all lifestages
- Grain-free: no grain ingredients listed
- Doesn't list beef, turkey, lamb, venison, pork, duck as ingredients
Consider something else if:
- Your dog avoids chicken: the label lists chicken
- Your dog avoids fish: the label lists cod liver oil
- You want a single-protein recipe: this one lists more than one animal protein
These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Find foods that fit your dog.
Ingredients (16)100% of the recipe is estimated
Estimated composition
- supplement 42.1%
- meat 29.4%
- veg 12.7%
- oil 6.1%
- unknown 5.2%
- mineral 4.5%
| # | As declared | Matched | Label reading | Declared % | Est. % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Chicken | Chicken | meat · medium | - | 8.2 |
| 2 | Finely Ground Chicken Bone | Bone | mineral · medium | - | 7.9 |
| 3 | Chicken Neck | Chicken Neck | meat · good | - | 7.7 |
| 4 | Chicken Organs (Liver and Heart) | Liver | meat · good | - | 7.4 |
| 5 | Alfalfa | Alfalfa | veg · good | - | 7.1 |
| 6 | Organic Kelp | Kelp | veg · good | - | 6.9 |
| 7 | Nutritional Yeast | Yeast | supplement · good | - | 6.6 |
| 8 | Cod Liver Oil | Cod Liver Oil | oil · good | - | 6.4 |
| 9 | Beetroot | Beetroot | veg · good | - | 6.1 |
| 10 | Vitamins (Choline Chloride, Vitamin E, Vitamin B12, Riboflavin, Folic Acid) | Vitamins and minerals | supplement · medium | - | 5.9 |
| 11 | Sea Salt | Sea Salt | mineral · medium | - | 5.6 |
| 12 | Zinc | Zinc Oxide | supplement · good | - | 5.4 |
| 13 | Iron | Iron | mineral · good | - | 5.1 |
| 14 | Copper | Copper | mineral · good | - | 4.8 |
| 15 | Manganese | Manganese | supplement · good | - | 4.6 |
| 16 | Probiotics of Bacilli and Lactobacilli sp. | Probiotic | supplement · good | - | 4.3 |
- 1. Chicken8.2% estimated
- 2. Finely Ground Chicken Bone7.9% estimated
- 3. Chicken Neck7.7% estimated
- 4. Chicken Organs (Liver and Heart)7.4% estimated
- 5. Alfalfa7.1% estimated
- 6. Organic Kelp6.9% estimated
- 7. Nutritional Yeast6.6% estimated
- 8. Cod Liver Oil6.4% estimated
- 9. Beetroot6.1% estimated
- 10. Vitamins (Choline Chloride, Vitamin E, Vitamin B12, Riboflavin, Folic Acid)5.9% estimated
- 11. Sea Salt5.6% estimated
- 12. Zinc5.4% estimated
- 13. Iron5.1% estimated
- 14. Copper4.8% estimated
- 15. Manganese4.6% estimated
- 16. Probiotics of Bacilli and Lactobacilli sp.4.3% estimated
Nutrition and feedingProtein 14% · Fat 14%
Declared analysis (as fed)
| Nutrient | As fed |
|---|---|
| Protein | 14% |
| Fat | 14% |
| Fibre | 0.90% |
| Moisture | 64% |
Additives & feeding info
Feeding and storage
Storage
Garder au congélateur. Décongeler au réfrigérateur la veille et garder au réfrigérateur jusqu'à 3 jours une fois décongelés. Ne pas laisser les médaillons crus à température de la pièce plus de 15 minutes.
Feeding guide
Poids du chien / Portion quotidienne: 10 lb (4,5 kg) 0.25 médaillons; 20 lb (9,1 kg) 0.5 médaillons; 30 lb (13,6 kg) 0.75 médaillons; 40 lb (18,1 kg) 1 médaillon; 60 lb (27,2 kg) 1.25 médaillon; 80 lb (36,3 kg) 1.5 médaillon; 100 lb (45,3 kg) 2 médaillons; 120 lb (54,4 kg) 2.5 médaillons. Pour les chiots, veuillez doubler la portion.
No additives recorded yet.
Trust and sourceNo recalls recorded in our database · checked 2026-09-19
Brand and contact: Faim Museau
- Website
- https://faimmuseau.com/
- [email protected]
- Phone
- 1 888 855-9622
- Contact page
- faimmuseau.com
Trust and provenance
- Recall history
- No recalls recorded in our database
- Label data last checked
- 2026-09-19
- Scored with
- Model v3 (methodology)
- Product page
- faimmuseau.com
Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.
Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.
Score details and methodologyCalculations, history and evidence
Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated
Why this score?
This recipe achieves a final score of 58 out of 100 based on several key factors. The overall quality of the ingredient list contributed +6.9, while ingredients without printed percentages contributed -10.6 to the overall evaluation. Additionally, the oil and fat content contributed -0.9, and the added vitamins and minerals contributed -0.8 to the final score.
Scored with model v3 on 2026-10-25. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.8 | 9.191 | +6.92 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 9.8% | -0.092 | -0.90 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 3.1% | -0.005 | -0.02 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 62.6% | -0.012 | -0.76 |
| Unrecognised share of dry matter | 4.2% | -0.027 | -0.11 |
| Undeclared quantities | 100.0% | -0.106 | -10.56 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | yes | -3.158 | -3.16 |
| Additive penalty | -0.09 | 0.222 | -0.02 |
| Processing multiplier | 1.12 | 33.786 | +37.84 |
| Processing: Raw | yes | -0.054 | -0.05 |
Show all 40 components
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.8 | 9.191 | +6.92 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 0.0% | 0.096 | +0.00 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.115 | +0.00 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 9.8% | -0.092 | -0.90 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 3.1% | -0.005 | -0.02 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 0.0% | 0.163 | +0.00 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 62.6% | -0.012 | -0.76 |
| Other share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.375 | +0.00 |
| Unrecognised share of dry matter | 4.2% | -0.027 | -0.11 |
| Recipe graded poor | 0.0% | -0.065 | +0.00 |
| Poor-quality meat in recipe | 0.0% | -0.179 | +0.00 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 0 | -0.876 | +0.00 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 0.0% | 0.060 | +0.00 |
| Undeclared quantities | 100.0% | -0.106 | -10.56 |
| Prints ingredient percentages | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Complete diet | no | 2.294 | +0.00 |
| Frozen or chilled fresh | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| High meat (30%+ of dry matter) | no | 0.707 | +0.00 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | yes | -3.158 | -3.16 |
| High carb and low meat | no | -1.180 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × printed percentages | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × fresh | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Fresh × high meat | 0.0 | 11.084 | +0.00 |
| Additive penalty | -0.09 | 0.222 | -0.02 |
| Processing multiplier | 1.12 | 33.786 | +37.84 |
| Processing: Raw | yes | -0.054 | -0.05 |
| Processing: Fresh Chilled | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Frozen | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Refrigerated | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Shelf | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Freeze Dried | no | 6.629 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Air Dried | no | 6.331 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Cold Pressed | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Baked | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Semi Moist | no | -6.174 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Muesli | no | -10.146 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Pate | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Chunks | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
- Processing-type offset
- -1.74
- Subtotal
- 58.3
- Final score
- 58/100
Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.
Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges
How the declared analysis compares with FEDIAF reference ranges for adult dogs. The label prints as-fed values; we convert to a dry-matter basis before scoring, and the bands are dry-matter ranges. Scores rise to 100 at the band midpoint: the reference is adequacy, not maximisation. Nutrients with a published upper limit taper again above it; fat is policed through calorie density rather than a direct penalty.
Guaranteed-analysis FEDIAF score: crude minimums and maximums are bounds, not typical values; moisture (a maximum) uses the processing median where available; experimental US score.
| Nutrient | As fed (label) | Dry matter (scored) | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| Protein | 14 | 38.9 (band 18 to 40%) | 100 |
| Fat | 14 | 38.9 (band 5.5 to 20%) | 100 |
| Fibre | 0.9 | 2.5 (band 0.5 to 5%) | 96.7 |
Scored over 3 declared nutrients (combined weight 50); undeclared nutrients do not affect the score.
No nutritional additives section declared on the label.
Low confidence: partial analysis or moisture estimated from the food type.
This measures agreement with published reference ranges, not suitability for an individual dog. For medical conditions, follow veterinary guidance.
Transparency: what the label discloses
How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.
| Item | Points |
|---|---|
| Ingredient list on the label (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Printed percentages on the label (voluntary) - not on file | 0/20 |
| Analytical constituents declared (mandatory) - not on file | 0/15 |
| Additives declared (mandatory) - not on file | 0/10 |
| Energy value declared (voluntary) - not on file | 0/5 |
| Complete/complementary designation (mandatory) | 5/5 |
| Feeding guidance given (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory) | 5/10 |
| Country of manufacture stated (voluntary) | 10/10 |
| Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file | 0/5 |
Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Analytical constituents declared, Additives declared, Batch and date labelling).
Safety: recall history
Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.
No recalls recorded in our database.
Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it
The claims made on the pack and product page, checked against the declared label. We record claims as stated; "consistent" means our stored label data supports the claim, "contradicted" means it conflicts with it. Functional claims are recorded but never scored.
100/100 · moderate — 1 checkable claim: 1 consistent, 0 contradicted.
Consistent with the label
- "Des repas complets, équilibrés et parfaitement proportionnés, prêts à servir, sans aucun ajout nécessaire" — supported by the declared complete and balanced data.
6 further claims on file that we cannot check against the label.
Moderate: every checkable claim is consistent with the declared label.
| Claim | Type | Check | Substantiation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ingrédients provenant de fermes et boucheries à proximité de notre usine de production à Bromont au Québec (on page) | provenance | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| protéines complètes qui favorisent une bonne santé dentaire et osseuse (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Facile à digérer et faible en calories, c'est l'allié parfait pour un poids santé (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| recette au poulet 100 % canadien (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Riche en fer, zinc, phosphore et vitamines B (on page) | Nutrient | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Des repas complets, équilibrés et parfaitement proportionnés, prêts à servir, sans aucun ajout nécessaire (on page) | Content | consistent | Manufacturer assertion |
| Conçus pour répondre aux besoins nutritionnels de tous les stades de vie (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.
Alternatives to Poulet
Similar on ingredients, protein, format or nutrition, using the same stored data.
Community0 comments
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.