Our verdict
Is About Us Performance 30/20 a good dog food?
We score it 40/100 (Poor). The main reasons are set out in "Why you might not" below, and every step of the calculation is shown under "How we calculated this score".
Only part of the analytical constituents are declared, so the nutritional picture is incomplete.
100% of this recipe has no printed percentage. Estimated shares are model estimates, not label facts.
Who is this food for?
Suits
- Labelled by the manufacturer for adult dogs
- Doesn't list beef, lamb, fish, venison, duck as ingredients
Consider something else if:
- Your dog avoids chicken: the label lists dehydrated poultry proteins
- Your dog avoids turkey: the label lists dehydrated poultry proteins
- Your dog avoids pork: the label lists dehydrated pork protein
- Your dog avoids grain: the label lists wheat
- You want a single-protein recipe: this one lists more than one animal protein
These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Find foods that fit your dog.
Ingredients (26)100% of the recipe is estimated
Estimated composition
- supplement 63.7%
- carb 14.6%
- meat 9.5%
- fibre 4.5%
- additive 4.4%
- mineral 3.3%
| # | As declared | Matched | Label reading | Declared % | Est. % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Wheat | Wheat | carb · poor | - | 5.1 |
| 2 | Wheat Shorts | Wheat | carb · poor | - | 5.0 |
| 3 | Pork Meal | Dehydrated Pork Protein | meat · good | - | 4.9 |
| 4 | Chicken Fat Preserved with Vitamin E (mixed tocopherols) | Vitamin E | supplement · good | - | 4.8 |
| 5 | Poultry Meal | Dehydrated Poultry Proteins | meat · good | - | 4.7 |
| 6 | Corn Gluten Meal | Maize gluten | carb · poor | - | 4.6 |
| 7 | Beet Pulp | Beet Pulp | fibre · medium | - | 4.5 |
| 8 | Sodium Chloride | Salt | additive · poor | - | 4.4 |
| 9 | Betaine Hydrochloride | Betaine Hydrochloride | supplement · medium | - | 4.3 |
| 10 | Potassium Chloride | Potassium Chloride | supplement · medium | - | 4.2 |
| 11 | Ferrous Sulphate | Iron sulfate | supplement · good | - | 4.1 |
| 12 | Zinc Oxide | Zinc Oxide | supplement · good | - | 4.0 |
| 13 | Vitamin E Supplement | Vitamin E | supplement · good | - | 3.9 |
| 14 | Copper Sulphate | Copper sulphate | supplement · good | - | 3.8 |
| 15 | Folic Acid Supplement | Folic acid | supplement · good | - | 3.7 |
| 16 | Vitamin B12 Supplement | Vitamin B12 | supplement · good | - | 3.6 |
| 17 | Vitamin A Supplement | Vitamin A | supplement · good | - | 3.5 |
| 18 | Niacin Supplement | Niacin | supplement · good | - | 3.4 |
| 19 | Selenium | Selenium | mineral · good | - | 3.3 |
| 20 | Manganese Oxide | Manganese (II) Oxide | supplement · good | - | 3.2 |
| 21 | Calcium Pantothenate Supplement | Calcium pantothenate | supplement · good | - | 3.1 |
| 22 | Riboflavin | Riboflavin | supplement · good | - | 3.0 |
| 23 | Menadione metabisulfite complex (source of Vitamin K activity) | Vitamin K | supplement · good | - | 2.9 |
| 24 | Biotin Supplement | Biotin | supplement · good | - | 2.8 |
| 25 | Vitamin D Supplement | Vitamin D | supplement · good | - | 2.7 |
| 26 | Calcium Iodate | Calcium iodate | supplement · medium | - | 2.6 |
- 1. Wheat5.1% estimated
- 2. Wheat Shorts5.0% estimated
- 3. Pork Meal4.9% estimated
- 4. Chicken Fat Preserved with Vitamin E (mixed tocopherols)4.8% estimated
- 5. Poultry Meal4.7% estimated
- 6. Corn Gluten Meal4.6% estimated
- 7. Beet Pulp4.5% estimated
- 8. Sodium Chloride4.4% estimated
- 9. Betaine Hydrochloride4.3% estimated
- 10. Potassium Chloride4.2% estimated
- 11. Ferrous Sulphate4.1% estimated
- 12. Zinc Oxide4.0% estimated
- 13. Vitamin E Supplement3.9% estimated
- 14. Copper Sulphate3.8% estimated
- 15. Folic Acid Supplement3.7% estimated
- 16. Vitamin B12 Supplement3.6% estimated
- 17. Vitamin A Supplement3.5% estimated
- 18. Niacin Supplement3.4% estimated
- 19. Selenium3.3% estimated
- 20. Manganese Oxide3.2% estimated
- 21. Calcium Pantothenate Supplement3.1% estimated
- 22. Riboflavin3.0% estimated
- 23. Menadione metabisulfite complex (source of Vitamin K activity)2.9% estimated
- 24. Biotin Supplement2.8% estimated
- 25. Vitamin D Supplement2.7% estimated
- 26. Calcium Iodate2.6% estimated
Nutrition and feedingProtein 30% · Fat 20%
Guaranteed analysis (as fed)
| Nutrient | As fed |
|---|---|
| Protein | 30% |
| Fat | 20% |
| Fibre | 2.50% |
| Moisture | 10% |
Energy: 385.1 kcal/100g
Additives & feeding info
Feeding and storage
Feeding guide
5lbs (2.3kg) 5/8 cup (60g); 10 lbs (4.5kg) 1 cup (100g); 20 lbs (9.1kg) 1 2/3 cup (165g); 30 lbs (14kg) 2 1/4 cups (225g); 40 lbs (18kg) 2 3/4 cups (270g); 50 lbs (23kg) 3 1/4 cups (320g); 60 lbs (27kg) 3 2/3 cups (365g); 80 lbs (36kg) 4 1/2 cups (445g); 100 lbs (45kg) 5 1/3 cups (530g); 120 lbs (54kg) 6 1/4 cups (620g). Adjust to maintain optimal weight.
No additives recorded yet.
Trust and sourceNo recalls recorded in our database · checked 2026-09-19
Brand and contact: About Us
- Phone
- 519-638-3003
- Address
- 58 McGivern Street, PO Box 9, Moorefield, ON N0G 2K0
- Contact page
- canadianpetfood.com
Trust and provenance
- Recall history
- No recalls recorded in our database
- Label data last checked
- 2026-09-19
- Scored with
- Model v3 (methodology)
- Product page
- canadianpetfood.com
Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.
Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.
Score details and methodologyCalculations, history and evidence
Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated
Why this score?
This recipe achieves a final score of 40 out of 100 based on several key factors. The overall quality of the ingredient list added +4.1 points. However, ingredients without printed percentages reduced the score by -10.6. Additionally, the processing format deducted -6.7 and the carbohydrate content contributed -1.6.
Scored with model v3 on 2026-10-25. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.5 | 9.191 | +4.14 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 14.2% | -0.115 | -1.63 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 4.3% | 0.163 | +0.70 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 64.1% | -0.012 | -0.78 |
| Recipe graded poor | 19.0% | -0.065 | -1.23 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 4 | -0.876 | -3.50 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 5.1% | 0.060 | +0.30 |
| Undeclared quantities | 100.0% | -0.106 | -10.56 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | yes | -3.158 | -3.16 |
| Additive penalty | -5.48 | 0.222 | -1.22 |
| Processing multiplier | 0.98 | 33.786 | +33.11 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | yes | -6.713 | -6.71 |
Show all 40 components
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.5 | 9.191 | +4.14 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 0.0% | 0.096 | +0.00 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 14.2% | -0.115 | -1.63 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.092 | +0.00 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.005 | +0.00 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 4.3% | 0.163 | +0.70 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 64.1% | -0.012 | -0.78 |
| Other share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.375 | +0.00 |
| Unrecognised share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.027 | +0.00 |
| Recipe graded poor | 19.0% | -0.065 | -1.23 |
| Poor-quality meat in recipe | 0.0% | -0.179 | +0.00 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 4 | -0.876 | -3.50 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 5.1% | 0.060 | +0.30 |
| Undeclared quantities | 100.0% | -0.106 | -10.56 |
| Prints ingredient percentages | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Complete diet | no | 2.294 | +0.00 |
| Frozen or chilled fresh | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| High meat (30%+ of dry matter) | no | 0.707 | +0.00 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | yes | -3.158 | -3.16 |
| High carb and low meat | no | -1.180 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × printed percentages | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × fresh | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Fresh × high meat | 0.0 | 11.084 | +0.00 |
| Additive penalty | -5.48 | 0.222 | -1.22 |
| Processing multiplier | 0.98 | 33.786 | +33.11 |
| Processing: Raw | no | -0.054 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Chilled | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Frozen | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Refrigerated | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Shelf | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Freeze Dried | no | 6.629 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Air Dried | no | 6.331 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Cold Pressed | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Baked | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | yes | -6.713 | -6.71 |
| Processing: Dry Semi Moist | no | -6.174 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Muesli | no | -10.146 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Pate | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Chunks | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
- Processing-type offset
- +0.02
- Subtotal
- 40.4
- Final score
- 40/100
Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.
Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges
How the declared analysis compares with FEDIAF reference ranges for adult dogs. The label prints as-fed values; we convert to a dry-matter basis before scoring, and the bands are dry-matter ranges. Scores rise to 100 at the band midpoint: the reference is adequacy, not maximisation. Nutrients with a published upper limit taper again above it; fat is policed through calorie density rather than a direct penalty.
Guaranteed-analysis FEDIAF score: crude minimums and maximums are bounds, not typical values; moisture (a maximum) uses the processing median where available; experimental US score.
| Nutrient | As fed (label) | Dry matter (scored) | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| Protein | 30 | 33.1 (band 19.14861878453039 to 40%) | 100 |
| Fat | 20 | 22.1 (band 5.85096685082873 to 20%) | 100 |
| Fibre | 2.5 | 2.8 (band 0.5 to 5%) | 100 |
| Energy (kcal/100g) | 385.1 | 425.5 | 100 |
Scored over 4 declared nutrients (combined weight 60); undeclared nutrients do not affect the score. Moisture was not declared and was estimated at 9.5% from the food type.
No nutritional additives section declared on the label.
Low confidence: partial analysis or moisture estimated from the food type.
This measures agreement with published reference ranges, not suitability for an individual dog. For medical conditions, follow veterinary guidance.
Transparency: what the label discloses
How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.
| Item | Points |
|---|---|
| Ingredient list on the label (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Printed percentages on the label (voluntary) - not on file | 0/20 |
| Analytical constituents declared (mandatory) - not on file | 0/15 |
| Additives declared (mandatory) - not on file | 0/10 |
| Energy value declared (voluntary) | 5/5 |
| Complete/complementary designation (mandatory) | 5/5 |
| Feeding guidance given (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Country of manufacture stated (voluntary) | 10/10 |
| Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file | 0/5 |
Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Analytical constituents declared, Additives declared, Batch and date labelling).
Safety: recall history
Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.
No recalls recorded in our database.
Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it
The claims made on the pack and product page, checked against the declared label. We record claims as stated; "consistent" means our stored label data supports the claim, "contradicted" means it conflicts with it. Functional claims are recorded but never scored.
Claims on file; none we can check against the label
| Claim | Type | Check | Substantiation |
|---|---|---|---|
| For Adult dogs with high activity (on pack) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| formulated to meet the AAFCO Nutrient Requirements for Growth, Maintenance and Reproduction (on pack) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| exceeds the NRC Nutrient Requirements for Dogs and Cats (2006) (on pack) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Meets AAFCO requirements (on pack) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| suitable for all life stages (on pack) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.
Alternatives to Performance 30/20
Similar on ingredients, protein, format or nutrition, using the same stored data.
Community0 comments
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.