Vetalogica Hunter Valley Harvest Dog Food
Dry Extruded · completeHigh meat
Our verdict
Is Vetalogica Hunter Valley Harvest Dog Food a good dog food?
We score it 53/100 (Average). This reflects the ingredient quality, composition and label transparency of the recipe as declared on the label.
Only part of the analytical constituents are declared, so the nutritional picture is incomplete.
100% of this recipe has no printed percentage. Estimated shares are model estimates, not label facts.
Who is this food for?
Suits
- Labelled by the manufacturer for all lifestages
- Grain-free: no grain ingredients listed
- Doesn't list beef, turkey, lamb, venison, pork as ingredients
Consider something else if:
- Your dog avoids chicken: the label lists dried chicken protein
- Your dog avoids fish: the label lists tuna
- Your dog avoids duck: the label lists dried duck protein
- You want a single-protein recipe: this one lists more than one animal protein
These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Find foods that fit your dog.
Ingredients (22)100% of the recipe is estimated
Estimated composition
- veg 39.1%
- meat 27.7%
- supplement 11.4%
- oil 9.4%
- carb 5.4%
- fibre 3.9%
- mineral 3.1%
| # | As declared | Matched | Label reading | Declared % | Est. % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Chicken Meal | Dried chicken protein | meat · good | - | 6.0 |
| 2 | Duck Meal | Dried Duck Protein | meat · good | - | 5.8 |
| 3 | Tuna Meal | Tuna | meat · good | - | 5.7 |
| 4 | Mackerel Meal | Mackerel Meal | meat · medium | - | 5.6 |
| 5 | Sweet Potatoes | Sweet Potatoes | carb · good | - | 5.4 |
| 6 | Chickpeas | Chickpeas | veg · good | - | 5.3 |
| 7 | Green Lentils | Lentils | veg · medium | - | 5.2 |
| 8 | Red Lentils | Lentils | veg · medium | - | 5.0 |
| 9 | Chicken Fat (Naturally preserved with Mixed Tocopherols) | Chicken Oil and Fat | oil · good | - | 4.9 |
| 10 | Ground Flaxseed | Ground Flaxseed (2%) | supplement · good | - | 4.7 |
| 11 | Eggs | Egg | meat · good | - | 4.6 |
| 12 | Coconut Oil | Coconut Oil | oil · medium | - | 4.5 |
| 13 | Dried Blueberries | Blueberries | veg · good | - | 4.3 |
| 14 | Kale | Kale | veg · good | - | 4.2 |
| 15 | Dried Spinach | Spinach | veg · good | - | 4.1 |
| 16 | Tomato Pomace | Tomato Pomace | fibre · medium | - | 3.9 |
| 17 | Dried Pumpkin | Pumpkin | veg · good | - | 3.8 |
| 18 | Kelp | Kelp | veg · good | - | 3.7 |
| 19 | Chicory Root (Prebiotic) | Chicory root | veg · good | - | 3.5 |
| 20 | Potassium Chloride | Potassium Chloride | supplement · medium | - | 3.4 |
| 21 | Choline Chloride | Choline | supplement · good | - | 3.3 |
| 22 | Sea Salt | Sea Salt | mineral · medium | - | 3.1 |
- 1. Chicken Meal6.0% estimated
- 2. Duck Meal5.8% estimated
- 3. Tuna Meal5.7% estimated
- 4. Mackerel Meal5.6% estimated
- 5. Sweet Potatoes5.4% estimated
- 6. Chickpeas5.3% estimated
- 7. Green Lentils5.2% estimated
- 8. Red Lentils5.0% estimated
- 9. Chicken Fat (Naturally preserved with Mixed Tocopherols)4.9% estimated
- 10. Ground Flaxseed4.7% estimated
- 11. Eggs4.6% estimated
- 12. Coconut Oil4.5% estimated
- 13. Dried Blueberries4.3% estimated
- 14. Kale4.2% estimated
- 15. Dried Spinach4.1% estimated
- 16. Tomato Pomace3.9% estimated
- 17. Dried Pumpkin3.8% estimated
- 18. Kelp3.7% estimated
- 19. Chicory Root (Prebiotic)3.5% estimated
- 20. Potassium Chloride3.4% estimated
- 21. Choline Chloride3.3% estimated
- 22. Sea Salt3.1% estimated
Nutrition and feedingProtein 38% · Fat 10%
Guaranteed analysis (as fed)
| Nutrient | As fed |
|---|---|
| Protein | 38% |
| Fat | 10% |
| Fibre | 3% |
| Moisture | 10% |
| Omega-3 fatty acids | 0.60% |
| Omega-6 fatty acids | 3% |
| Calcium | 2% |
| Phosphorus | 1.30% |
Energy: 350 kcal/100g
Additives & feeding info
Feeding and storage
Feeding guide
Feed according to your dog's weight and adjust as needed to maintain a healthy body condition. 1–5kg: 60–90g (½–¾ cup) daily. 5–10kg: 90–125g (¾–1 cup) daily. 10–20kg: 125–250g (1–2 cups) daily. 20–35kg: 250–350g (2–2¾ cups) daily. 35–45kg: 350–500g (2¾–4 cups) daily. 45–60kg: 500–600g (4–4¾ cups) daily. 60kg+: 600g+ (4¾+ cups) daily. Introduce gradually over 7–10 days. Always ensure plenty of clean, fresh water is available.
Additives declared on the label
Nutritional additives
Vitamin E Supplement; Niacin (Vitamin B3); Calcium Pantothenate (Vitamin B5); Riboflavin (Vitamin B2); Pyridoxine Hydrochloride (Vitamin B6); Thiamine Mononitrate (Vitamin B1); Folic Acid; Biotin; Vitamin A Supplement; Vitamin B12 Supplement; Vitamin D3 Supplement; Zinc Sulfate; Ferrous Sulfate; Magnesium Oxide; Copper Sulfate; Manganese Oxide; Iodine; Sodium Selenite; Zinc Propionate
Technological additives
Mixed Tocopherols (a Natural preservative); Rosemary Extract
Trust and sourceNo recalls recorded in our database · checked 2026-09-17
Brand and contact: Vetalogica
Trust and provenance
- Recall history
- No recalls recorded in our database
- Label data last checked
- 2026-09-17
- Scored with
- Model v3 (methodology)
- Product page
- www.vetalogica.com.au
Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.
Brand and retailer reviews
External platform ratings are not scores for this individual recipe.
Trustpilot: 4.7/5 · 6,843 reviews
Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.
Score details and methodologyCalculations, history and evidence
Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated
Why this score?
This recipe achieves an overall score of 53 out of 100 based on several key factors. The inclusion of ingredients without printed percentages contributed -10.6 points, while the overall quality of the ingredient list added +7.2 points. Additionally, the processing format adjusted the score by -6.7, and being labelled nutritionally complete contributed +2.3 points.
Scored with model v3 on 2026-10-25. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.8 | 9.191 | +7.20 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 2.0% | -0.115 | -0.23 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 13.7% | -0.092 | -1.26 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 26.2% | -0.005 | -0.14 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 15.4% | -0.012 | -0.19 |
| Undeclared quantities | 100.0% | -0.106 | -10.56 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | yes | -3.158 | -3.16 |
| Additive penalty | -0.06 | 0.222 | -0.01 |
| Processing multiplier | 0.98 | 33.786 | +33.11 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | yes | -6.713 | -6.71 |
Show all 40 components
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.8 | 9.191 | +7.20 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 0.0% | 0.096 | +0.00 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 2.0% | -0.115 | -0.23 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 13.7% | -0.092 | -1.26 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 26.2% | -0.005 | -0.14 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 0.0% | 0.163 | +0.00 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 15.4% | -0.012 | -0.19 |
| Other share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.375 | +0.00 |
| Unrecognised share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.027 | +0.00 |
| Recipe graded poor | 0.0% | -0.065 | +0.00 |
| Poor-quality meat in recipe | 0.0% | -0.179 | +0.00 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 0 | -0.876 | +0.00 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 0.0% | 0.060 | +0.00 |
| Undeclared quantities | 100.0% | -0.106 | -10.56 |
| Prints ingredient percentages | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| Frozen or chilled fresh | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| High meat (30%+ of dry matter) | no | 0.707 | +0.00 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | yes | -3.158 | -3.16 |
| High carb and low meat | no | -1.180 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × printed percentages | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × fresh | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Fresh × high meat | 0.0 | 11.084 | +0.00 |
| Additive penalty | -0.06 | 0.222 | -0.01 |
| Processing multiplier | 0.98 | 33.786 | +33.11 |
| Processing: Raw | no | -0.054 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Chilled | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Frozen | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Refrigerated | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Shelf | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Freeze Dried | no | 6.629 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Air Dried | no | 6.331 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Cold Pressed | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Baked | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | yes | -6.713 | -6.71 |
| Processing: Dry Semi Moist | no | -6.174 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Muesli | no | -10.146 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Pate | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Chunks | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
- Processing-type offset
- +0.02
- Additives declared on label
- +2 transparency bonus
- Subtotal
- 53.3
- Final score
- 53/100
Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.
Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges
How the declared analysis compares with FEDIAF reference ranges for adult dogs. The label prints as-fed values; we convert to a dry-matter basis before scoring, and the bands are dry-matter ranges. Scores rise to 100 at the band midpoint: the reference is adequacy, not maximisation. Nutrients with a published upper limit taper again above it; fat is policed through calorie density rather than a direct penalty.
Guaranteed-analysis FEDIAF score: crude minimums and maximums are bounds, not typical values; moisture (a maximum) uses the processing median where available; experimental US score.
| Nutrient | As fed (label) | Dry matter (scored) | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| Protein | 38 | 42 (band 18 to 40%) | 100 |
| Fat | 10 | 11 (band 5.5 to 20%) | 93 |
| Fibre | 3 | 3.3 (band 0.5 to 5%) | 100 |
| Calcium | 2 | 2.2 (band 0.5 to 2.5%) | 100 |
| Phosphorus | 1.3 | 1.4 (band 0.4 to 1.6%) | 100 |
| Calcium:phosphorus ratio | 1.5 | 1.5 (band 1 to 2%) | 100 |
| Omega fatty acids (omega-6 and omega-3) | - | - | 100 |
| Energy (kcal/100g) | 350 | 386.7 | 100 |
Omega fatty acids (omega-6 and omega-3): scored as the mean of its declared components (omega-6 100). The FEDIAF minimum for omega-6 is linoleic acid specifically.
Scored over 8 declared nutrients (combined weight 100); undeclared nutrients do not affect the score. Moisture was not declared and was estimated at 9.5% from the food type.
Declared fortification: 19 nutritional additives on the label
- Vitamin E Supplement
- Niacin (Vitamin B3)
- Calcium Pantothenate (Vitamin B5)
- Riboflavin (Vitamin B2)
- Pyridoxine Hydrochloride (Vitamin B6)
- Thiamine Mononitrate (Vitamin B1)
- Folic Acid
- Biotin
- Vitamin A Supplement
- Vitamin B12 Supplement
- Vitamin D3 Supplement
- Zinc Sulfate
- Ferrous Sulfate
- Magnesium Oxide
- Copper Sulfate
- Manganese Oxide
- Iodine
- Sodium Selenite
- Zinc Propionate
Low confidence: partial analysis or moisture estimated from the food type.
This measures agreement with published reference ranges, not suitability for an individual dog. For medical conditions, follow veterinary guidance.
Transparency: what the label discloses
How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.
| Item | Points |
|---|---|
| Ingredient list on the label (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Printed percentages on the label (voluntary) - not on file | 0/20 |
| Analytical constituents declared (mandatory) - not on file | 0/15 |
| Additives declared (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Energy value declared (voluntary) | 5/5 |
| Complete/complementary designation (mandatory) | 5/5 |
| Feeding guidance given (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory) | 5/10 |
| Country of manufacture stated (voluntary) | 10/10 |
| Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file | 0/5 |
Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Analytical constituents declared, Batch and date labelling).
Safety: recall history
Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.
No recalls recorded in our database.
Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it
The claims made on the pack and product page, checked against the declared label. We record claims as stated; "consistent" means our stored label data supports the claim, "contradicted" means it conflicts with it. Functional claims are recorded but never scored.
100/100 · moderate — 2 checkable claims: 2 consistent, 0 contradicted.
Consistent with the label
- "High Protein, Low Carb - With 38% protein, Hunter Valley Harvest provides nutrient-dense nutrition designed around your dog's biological needs." — supported by the declared high protein data.
- "Naturally Grain Free - Made with zero grains, gluten, corn, wheat or soy." — supported by the declared grain-free data.
3 further claims on file that we cannot check against the label.
Moderate: every checkable claim is consistent with the declared label.
| Claim | Type | Check | Substantiation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Australian Made & Owned - Proudly made here in Australia (on page) | provenance | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Complete & Balanced Nutrition - Complete everyday nutrition with fruits, vegetables, prebiotics, vitamins and minerals to help your dog look and feel their best. (on pack) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| 65% Meat & Animal Ingredients - Australian chicken, duck, egg, tuna and mackerel provide a diverse combination of quality animal nutrition. (on pack) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| High Protein, Low Carb - With 38% protein, Hunter Valley Harvest provides nutrient-dense nutrition designed around your dog's biological needs. (on pack) | High/low level | consistent | Manufacturer assertion |
| Naturally Grain Free - Made with zero grains, gluten, corn, wheat or soy. (on pack) | Free-from | consistent | Manufacturer assertion |
The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.
Alternatives to Hunter Valley Harvest Dog Food
Similar on ingredients, protein, format or nutrition, using the same stored data.
Community0 comments
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.