Our verdict
Is Tucker Tub Feather & Fin Feast Dog Food a good dog food?
We score it 57/100 (Average). This reflects the ingredient quality, composition and label transparency of the recipe as declared on the label.
Only part of the analytical constituents are declared, so the nutritional picture is incomplete.
100% of this recipe has no printed percentage. Estimated shares are model estimates, not label facts.
Who is this food for?
Suits
- Labelled by the manufacturer for all lifestages
- Doesn't list beef, turkey, lamb, venison, pork, duck as ingredients
Consider something else if:
- Your dog avoids chicken: the label lists chicken
- Your dog avoids fish: the label lists sardines
- Your dog avoids grain: the label lists oat bran
- You want a single-protein recipe: this one lists more than one animal protein
These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Find foods that fit your dog.
Ingredients (17)100% of the recipe is estimated
Estimated composition
- meat 40.5%
- veg 29.7%
- other 9.0%
- oil 7.7%
- fibre 7.2%
- supplement 5.9%
| # | As declared | Matched | Label reading | Declared % | Est. % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Chicken (including bone and cartilage) | Chicken | meat · medium | - | 7.7 |
| 2 | organ meat | Offal | meat · medium | - | 7.5 |
| 3 | whole sardines | Sardines | meat · good | - | 7.2 |
| 4 | salmon | Salmon | meat · good | - | 7.0 |
| 5 | bone broth | Cooking broth | other · medium | - | 6.8 |
| 6 | typically kale | Kale | veg · good | - | 6.6 |
| 7 | carrots | Carrots | veg · good | - | 6.3 |
| 8 | pumpkin | Pumpkin | veg · good | - | 6.1 |
| 9 | beans | Fava Beans | veg · medium | - | 5.9 |
| 10 | and apples | Apples | veg · good | - | 5.7 |
| 11 | oat bran | Oat bran | fibre · good | - | 5.4 |
| 12 | milled flaxseed | Linseed | veg · good | - | 5.2 |
| 13 | sunflower oil | Sunflower oil | oil · good | - | 5.0 |
| 14 | psyllium husk | Psyllium fibre | fibre · good | - | 4.8 |
| 15 | kelp | Kelp | veg · good | - | 4.5 |
| 16 | spirulina | Spirulina | veg · good | - | 4.3 |
| 17 | and vitamins and minerals. | Vitamins and minerals | supplement · medium | - | 4.1 |
- 1. Chicken (including bone and cartilage)7.7% estimated
- 2. organ meat7.5% estimated
- 3. whole sardines7.2% estimated
- 4. salmon7.0% estimated
- 5. bone broth6.8% estimated
- 6. typically kale6.6% estimated
- 7. carrots6.3% estimated
- 8. pumpkin6.1% estimated
- 9. beans5.9% estimated
- 10. and apples5.7% estimated
- 11. oat bran5.4% estimated
- 12. milled flaxseed5.2% estimated
- 13. sunflower oil5.0% estimated
- 14. psyllium husk4.8% estimated
- 15. kelp4.5% estimated
- 16. spirulina4.3% estimated
- 17. and vitamins and minerals.4.1% estimated
Nutrition and feedingProtein 12.50% · Fat 9%
Declared analysis (as fed)
| Nutrient | As fed |
|---|---|
| Protein | 12.50% |
| Fat | 9% |
| Fibre | 1% |
| Moisture | 74% |
Energy: 133.3 kcal/100g
Additives & feeding info
No additives recorded yet.
Trust and sourceNo recalls recorded in our database · checked 2026-09-17
Brand and contact: Tucker Tub
- [email protected]
- Phone
- (03) 5784 3541
- Address
- 218 High Street, Broadford VIC 3340, Australia
- Contact page
- www.tuckertub.com.au
Trust and provenance
- Recall history
- No recalls recorded in our database
- Label data last checked
- 2026-09-17
- Scored with
- Model v3 (methodology)
- Product page
- www.tuckertub.com.au
Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.
Brand and retailer reviews
External platform ratings are not scores for this individual recipe.
Trustpilot: 3.5/5 · 2 reviews
Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.
Score details and methodologyCalculations, history and evidence
Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated
Why this score?
The product reached a score of 57 out of 100. Undeclared ingredient shares (ingredients without printed percentages) contributed -10.6 points, while the overall quality of the ingredient list added +7.8 points. The processing format deducted -2.4 points, and being labelled nutritionally complete added back +2.3 points.
Scored with model v3 on 2026-10-25. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.8 | 9.191 | +7.79 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 14.7% | -0.092 | -1.35 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 39.4% | -0.005 | -0.20 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 10.4% | -0.012 | -0.13 |
| Other share of dry matter | 0.9% | -0.375 | -0.33 |
| Undeclared quantities | 100.0% | -0.106 | -10.56 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | yes | -3.158 | -3.16 |
| Processing multiplier | 1.07 | 33.786 | +36.15 |
| Processing: Fresh Chilled | yes | -2.354 | -2.35 |
Show all 40 components
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.8 | 9.191 | +7.79 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 0.0% | 0.096 | +0.00 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.115 | +0.00 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 14.7% | -0.092 | -1.35 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 39.4% | -0.005 | -0.20 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 0.0% | 0.163 | +0.00 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 10.4% | -0.012 | -0.13 |
| Other share of dry matter | 0.9% | -0.375 | -0.33 |
| Unrecognised share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.027 | +0.00 |
| Recipe graded poor | 0.0% | -0.065 | +0.00 |
| Poor-quality meat in recipe | 0.0% | -0.179 | +0.00 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 0 | -0.876 | +0.00 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 0.0% | 0.060 | +0.00 |
| Undeclared quantities | 100.0% | -0.106 | -10.56 |
| Prints ingredient percentages | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| Frozen or chilled fresh | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| High meat (30%+ of dry matter) | no | 0.707 | +0.00 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | yes | -3.158 | -3.16 |
| High carb and low meat | no | -1.180 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × printed percentages | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × fresh | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Fresh × high meat | 0.0 | 11.084 | +0.00 |
| Additive penalty | 0.00 | 0.222 | +0.00 |
| Processing multiplier | 1.07 | 33.786 | +36.15 |
| Processing: Raw | no | -0.054 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Chilled | yes | -2.354 | -2.35 |
| Processing: Fresh Frozen | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Refrigerated | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Shelf | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Freeze Dried | no | 6.629 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Air Dried | no | 6.331 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Cold Pressed | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Baked | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Semi Moist | no | -6.174 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Muesli | no | -10.146 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Pate | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Chunks | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
- Processing-type offset
- -1.74
- Subtotal
- 57.3
- Final score
- 57/100
Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.
Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges
How the declared analysis compares with FEDIAF reference ranges for adult dogs. The label prints as-fed values; we convert to a dry-matter basis before scoring, and the bands are dry-matter ranges. Scores rise to 100 at the band midpoint: the reference is adequacy, not maximisation. Nutrients with a published upper limit taper again above it; fat is policed through calorie density rather than a direct penalty.
Guaranteed-analysis FEDIAF score: crude minimums and maximums are bounds, not typical values; moisture (a maximum) uses the processing median where available; experimental US score.
| Nutrient | As fed (label) | Dry matter (scored) | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| Protein | 12.5 | 46.3 (band 22.21666666666667 to 40%) | 100 |
| Fat | 9 | 33.3 (band 6.788425925925926 to 20%) | 100 |
| Fibre | 1 | 3.7 (band 0.5 to 5%) | 100 |
| Energy (kcal/100g) | 133.3 | 493.7 | 100 |
Scored over 4 declared nutrients (combined weight 60); undeclared nutrients do not affect the score. Moisture was not declared and was estimated at 73% from the food type.
No nutritional additives section declared on the label.
Low confidence: partial analysis or moisture estimated from the food type.
This measures agreement with published reference ranges, not suitability for an individual dog. For medical conditions, follow veterinary guidance.
Transparency: what the label discloses
How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.
| Item | Points |
|---|---|
| Ingredient list on the label (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Printed percentages on the label (voluntary) - not on file | 0/20 |
| Analytical constituents declared (mandatory) - not on file | 0/15 |
| Additives declared (mandatory) - not on file | 0/10 |
| Energy value declared (voluntary) | 5/5 |
| Complete/complementary designation (mandatory) | 5/5 |
| Feeding guidance given (mandatory) - not on file | 0/10 |
| Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Country of manufacture stated (voluntary) | 10/10 |
| Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file | 0/5 |
Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Analytical constituents declared, Additives declared, Feeding guidance given, Batch and date labelling).
Safety: recall history
Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.
No recalls recorded in our database.
Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it
The claims made on the pack and product page, checked against the declared label. We record claims as stated; "consistent" means our stored label data supports the claim, "contradicted" means it conflicts with it. Functional claims are recorded but never scored.
Claims on file; none we can check against the label
| Claim | Type | Check | Substantiation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Australian made. Nutritionist formulated. Chef-prepared. (on page) | provenance | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Chicken with bone and cartilage, plus organ meats: Natural sources of protein, calcium, glucosamine, iron, and B vitamins to support bone strength and vitality. (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Salmon and whole sardines: Omega-3-rich proteins that promote healthy joints, glossy coats, and steady energy. (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Nourishing bone broth and natural collagen: Provides gelatin and collagen to protect gut lining, improve digestion, and maintain joint health. (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Seasonal vegetables (kale, carrot, pumpkin, zucchini, apple): Rich in antioxidants, fibre, and natural prebiotics to strengthen immunity and digestion. (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Psyllium husk, oat bran, and milled flaxseed: Gentle fibres and omega-rich seeds that nurture the gut microbiome, regulate digestion, and improve stool quality. (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Sunflower oil, kelp, and spirulina: Superfoods delivering essential fatty acids, iodine, and antioxidants to support thyroid health, immune function, and skin vitality. (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Meets AAFCO nutritional profiles for dogs of all life stages. (on page) | Nutrient | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.
Alternatives to Feather & Fin Feast Dog Food
Similar on ingredients, protein, format or nutrition, using the same stored data.
Community0 comments
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.