Jack and Chelo Chicken and Carrot with Chia Meal
Fresh Chilled · complete
Our verdict
Is Jack and Chelo Chicken and Carrot with Chia Meal a good dog food?
We score it 59/100 (Average). This reflects the ingredient quality, composition and label transparency of the recipe as declared on the label.
100% of this recipe has no printed percentage. Estimated shares are model estimates, not label facts.
Who is this food for?
Suits
- Labelled by the manufacturer for all lifestages
- Grain-free: no grain ingredients listed
- Doesn't list beef, turkey, lamb, venison, pork, duck as ingredients
Consider something else if:
- Your dog avoids chicken: the label lists chicken gizzard
- Your dog avoids fish: the label lists cod liver oil
- You want a single-protein recipe: this one lists more than one animal protein
These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Find foods that fit your dog.
Ingredients (18)100% of the recipe is estimated
Estimated composition
- veg 41.0%
- meat 29.4%
- mineral 9.7%
- carb 6.3%
- supplement 5.0%
- oil 4.5%
- other 4.1%
| # | As declared | Matched | Label reading | Declared % | Est. % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Tasmanian RSPCA Chicken Breast and Thigh | Breast | meat · medium | - | 7.3 |
| 2 | Chicken Gizzard | Chicken Gizzard | meat · good | - | 7.1 |
| 3 | Chicken Liver | Chicken Liver | meat · good | - | 6.9 |
| 4 | Chicken Heart | Chicken Heart | meat · good | - | 6.7 |
| 5 | Carrot | Carrots | veg · good | - | 6.5 |
| 6 | Celery | Celery Seeds | veg · good | - | 6.3 |
| 7 | Sweet Potato | Sweet Potatoes | carb · good | - | 6.1 |
| 8 | Green Peas | Peas | veg · good | - | 5.9 |
| 9 | Parsley | Parsley | veg · good | - | 5.7 |
| 10 | Sunflower Seeds | Sunflower Seeds | veg · good | - | 5.5 |
| 11 | MCHA Powder (Calcium Derived From Bones) | Bone | mineral · medium | - | 5.3 |
| 12 | Chia Seeds | Chia Seeds | veg · good | - | 5.1 |
| 13 | Eggshell Powder | Crushed Eggshells | supplement · good | - | 4.8 |
| 14 | Seaweed | Seaweed | veg · good | - | 4.6 |
| 15 | Cod-liver Oil | Cod Liver Oil | oil · good | - | 4.4 |
| 16 | Sea Salt | Sea Salt | mineral · medium | - | 4.2 |
| 17 | Trace Vitamins and Minerals | Vitamins and minerals | supplement · medium | - | 4.0 |
| 18 | Jack and Chelo Chicken Bone Broth | Cooking broth | other · medium | - | 3.8 |
- 1. Tasmanian RSPCA Chicken Breast and Thigh7.3% estimated
- 2. Chicken Gizzard7.1% estimated
- 3. Chicken Liver6.9% estimated
- 4. Chicken Heart6.7% estimated
- 5. Carrot6.5% estimated
- 6. Celery6.3% estimated
- 7. Sweet Potato6.1% estimated
- 8. Green Peas5.9% estimated
- 9. Parsley5.7% estimated
- 10. Sunflower Seeds5.5% estimated
- 11. MCHA Powder (Calcium Derived From Bones)5.3% estimated
- 12. Chia Seeds5.1% estimated
- 13. Eggshell Powder4.8% estimated
- 14. Seaweed4.6% estimated
- 15. Cod-liver Oil4.4% estimated
- 16. Sea Salt4.2% estimated
- 17. Trace Vitamins and Minerals4.0% estimated
- 18. Jack and Chelo Chicken Bone Broth3.8% estimated
Nutrition and feeding
Declared analysis (as fed)
No analysis recorded yet.
Additives & feeding info
Additives declared on the label
Nutritional additives
trace vitamins and minerals
Trust and sourceNo recalls recorded in our database · checked 2026-09-19
Brand and contact: Jack and Chelo
- Website
- https://jackandchelo.com.au/
Trust and provenance
- Recall history
- No recalls recorded in our database
- Label data last checked
- 2026-09-19
- Scored with
- Model v3 (methodology)
- Product page
- jackandchelo.com.au
Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.
Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.
Score details and methodologyCalculations, history and evidence
Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated
Why this score?
The product reached a score of 59 out of 100. Undeclared ingredient shares (ingredients without printed percentages) contributed -10.6 points, while the overall quality of the ingredient list added +7.8 points. The processing format deducted -2.4 points, and being labelled nutritionally complete added back +2.3 points.
Scored with model v3 on 2026-10-25. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.9 | 9.191 | +7.85 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 3.4% | -0.115 | -0.39 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 9.7% | -0.092 | -0.89 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 38.7% | -0.005 | -0.20 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 9.9% | -0.012 | -0.12 |
| Other share of dry matter | 0.4% | -0.375 | -0.17 |
| Undeclared quantities | 100.0% | -0.106 | -10.56 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | yes | -3.158 | -3.16 |
| Additive penalty | -0.09 | 0.222 | -0.02 |
| Processing multiplier | 1.07 | 33.786 | +36.15 |
| Processing: Fresh Chilled | yes | -2.354 | -2.35 |
Show all 40 components
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.9 | 9.191 | +7.85 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 0.0% | 0.096 | +0.00 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 3.4% | -0.115 | -0.39 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 9.7% | -0.092 | -0.89 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 38.7% | -0.005 | -0.20 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 0.0% | 0.163 | +0.00 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 9.9% | -0.012 | -0.12 |
| Other share of dry matter | 0.4% | -0.375 | -0.17 |
| Unrecognised share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.027 | +0.00 |
| Recipe graded poor | 0.0% | -0.065 | +0.00 |
| Poor-quality meat in recipe | 0.0% | -0.179 | +0.00 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 0 | -0.876 | +0.00 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 0.0% | 0.060 | +0.00 |
| Undeclared quantities | 100.0% | -0.106 | -10.56 |
| Prints ingredient percentages | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| Frozen or chilled fresh | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| High meat (30%+ of dry matter) | no | 0.707 | +0.00 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | yes | -3.158 | -3.16 |
| High carb and low meat | no | -1.180 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × printed percentages | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × fresh | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Fresh × high meat | 0.0 | 11.084 | +0.00 |
| Additive penalty | -0.09 | 0.222 | -0.02 |
| Processing multiplier | 1.07 | 33.786 | +36.15 |
| Processing: Raw | no | -0.054 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Chilled | yes | -2.354 | -2.35 |
| Processing: Fresh Frozen | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Refrigerated | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Shelf | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Freeze Dried | no | 6.629 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Air Dried | no | 6.331 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Cold Pressed | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Baked | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Semi Moist | no | -6.174 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Muesli | no | -10.146 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Pate | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Chunks | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
- Processing-type offset
- -1.74
- Additives declared on label
- +1 transparency bonus
- Subtotal
- 58.6
- Final score
- 59/100
Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.
Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges
Analytical constituents not declared
Declared fortification: 1 nutritional additive on the label
- trace vitamins and minerals
Transparency: what the label discloses
How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.
| Item | Points |
|---|---|
| Ingredient list on the label (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Printed percentages on the label (voluntary) - not on file | 0/20 |
| Analytical constituents declared (mandatory) - not on file | 0/15 |
| Additives declared (mandatory) | 5/10 |
| Energy value declared (voluntary) - not on file | 0/5 |
| Complete/complementary designation (mandatory) | 5/5 |
| Feeding guidance given (mandatory) - not on file | 0/10 |
| Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory) | 5/10 |
| Country of manufacture stated (voluntary) | 10/10 |
| Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file | 0/5 |
Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Analytical constituents declared, Feeding guidance given, Batch and date labelling).
Safety: recall history
Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.
No recalls recorded in our database.
Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it
The claims made on the pack and product page, checked against the declared label. We record claims as stated; "consistent" means our stored label data supports the claim, "contradicted" means it conflicts with it. Functional claims are recorded but never scored.
Claims on file; none we can check against the label
| Claim | Type | Check | Substantiation |
|---|---|---|---|
| cooked sous vide (in bag), at low temperatures to retain flavor and nutrients (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| nutritional veggies such as carrot, celery and parsley for fibre and good digestion (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Chia seeds and a dash of cod-liver oil ensures that vitamin D levels are good, and that omega 3 fatty acids are in plentiful supply for your dogs skin and coat (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| chicken we use is 100% Tasmanian RSPCA approved (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| contains no other proteins (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| formulated with a pet nutritionist to meet the nutritional levels established by the AAFCO dog food nutrient profiles for all life stages (on page) | Nutrient | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| includes whole chicken breast pieces (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| add chicken offal including both liver, heart and gizzards (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Tasmanian raised or grown (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.
Alternatives to Chicken and Carrot with Chia Meal
Similar on ingredients, protein, format or nutrition, using the same stored data.
Community0 comments
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.