Cobber Working Dog

Dry Extruded complete

Working Dog
Poor
our rating

Is Cobber Working Dog a good dog food?

We score it 40/100 (Poor). The main reasons are set out in "Why you might not" below, and every step of the calculation is shown under "How we calculated this score".

How we score

Why this score?

This recipe achieves an overall score of 40 out of 100 based on several key factors. Ingredients without printed percentages contributed -10.6, while the processing format added -6.7 to the total. Additionally, the additive load contributed -4.2, and the additives in the recipe provided +3.5.

100% of this recipe has no printed percentage. Estimated shares are model estimates, not label facts.

The Recipe score measures how attractive and transparent the declared ingredient list is. It is not, by itself, proof that the food is nutritionally appropriate for long-term feeding. The Nutritional and Evidence scores measure what we can verify towards that stronger claim.

Estimated composition

meat23.0%
carb21.4%
supplement20.7%
additive15.6%
veg13.3%
fibre6.1%

Typical analysis (as fed)

Protein
28%
Fat
18%
Fibre
2.40%
Ash
0%
Moisture
0%
Carbohydrates
0%
Omega-3 fatty acids
0%
Omega-6 fatty acids
0%
Calcium
0%
Phosphorus
0%
Sodium
0%

Energy: 370 kcal/100g

Dry matter basis

Protein
0%
Fat
0%
Fibre
0%
Ash
0%
Carbohydrates
0%

Additives & feeding info

No additives recorded yet.

Feeding guide

Moderate Energy / High Energy: Small (5-10kg) 130-170g / 170-250g; Medium (10-25kg) 170-330g / 250-480g; Large (25-40kg) 330-480g / 480-710g. 1 cup ≈ 130g.

Who is this food for?

Suits

  • Labelled by the manufacturer for adult dogs
  • Doesn't list fish, venison, pork, duck as ingredients

Consider something else if:

  • Your dog avoids chicken: the label lists chicken
  • Your dog avoids beef: the label lists beef
  • Your dog avoids turkey: the label lists poultry
  • Your dog avoids lamb: it is listed as an ingredient
  • Your dog avoids grain: the label lists wheat
  • You want a single-protein recipe: this one lists more than one animal protein

These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Use the homepage filter to find foods that fit your dog.

Ingredients (16)

#As declaredMatchedCategoryTierDeclared %Est. %
1ChickenChickenmeatmedium-8.2
2Beef and/or LambBeefmeatmedium-7.9
3Wholegrain WheatWheatcarbpoor-7.7
4LegumesCarrotsveggood-7.4
5Wholegrain SorghumSorghumcarbmedium-7.1
6Beef Tallow and/or Poultry OilPoultrymeatmedium-6.9
7Wholegrain BarleyBarleycarbmedium-6.6
8Natural Flavour (Chicken and/or Beef)Smoked Flavouradditivepoor-6.4
9Beet PulpBeet Pulpfibremedium-6.1
10Chicory RootChicory rootveggood-5.9
11Yucca ExtractYucca Schidigerasupplementgood-5.6
12Vitamins and MineralsVitamins and mineralssupplementmedium-5.4
13Yeast Extract (Postbiotics)Hydrolysed Yeastadditivemedium-5.1
14PreservativesPreservativesadditivemedium-4.8
15Amino AcidsInositol and amino acidssupplementgood-4.6
16AntioxidantAntioxidantsadditivemedium-4.3

Brand

Trust and provenance

Recall history
No recalls recorded in our database
Label data last checked
2026-10-07
Scored with
Model v3 (methodology)

Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.

Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.

Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated

Scored with model v3 on 2026-10-07. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.

ComponentInputCoefficientContribution
Base score-30.909+30.91
Average ingredient quality0.39.191+2.89
Carb share of dry matter28.7%-0.115-3.30
Vegetable share of dry matter3.0%-0.005-0.02
Additive share of dry matter21.3%0.163+3.47
Supplement share of dry matter28.9%-0.012-0.35
Recipe graded poor14.0%-0.065-0.91
Number of poor ingredients2-0.876-1.75
Largest single poor ingredient7.7%0.060+0.46
Undeclared quantities100.0%-0.106-10.56
Low meat (under 10% of dry matter)yes-3.158-3.16
Additive penalty-18.770.222-4.17
Processing multiplier0.9833.786+33.11
Processing: Dry Extrudedyes-6.713-6.71
Show all 40 components
ComponentInputCoefficientContribution
Base score-30.909+30.91
Average ingredient quality0.39.191+2.89
Meat share of dry matter0.0%0.096+0.00
Carb share of dry matter28.7%-0.115-3.30
Oil share of dry matter0.0%-0.092+0.00
Vegetable share of dry matter3.0%-0.005-0.02
Additive share of dry matter21.3%0.163+3.47
Supplement share of dry matter28.9%-0.012-0.35
Other share of dry matter0.0%-0.375+0.00
Unrecognised share of dry matter0.0%-0.027+0.00
Recipe graded poor14.0%-0.065-0.91
Poor-quality meat in recipe0.0%-0.179+0.00
Number of poor ingredients2-0.876-1.75
Largest single poor ingredient7.7%0.060+0.46
Undeclared quantities100.0%-0.106-10.56
Prints ingredient percentagesno0.000+0.00
Complete dietno2.294+0.00
Frozen or chilled freshno0.000+0.00
High meat (30%+ of dry matter)no0.707+0.00
Low meat (under 10% of dry matter)yes-3.158-3.16
High carb and low meatno-1.180+0.00
Meat share × printed percentages0.00.000+0.00
Meat share × fresh0.00.000+0.00
Fresh × high meat0.011.084+0.00
Additive penalty-18.770.222-4.17
Processing multiplier0.9833.786+33.11
Processing: Rawno-0.054+0.00
Processing: Fresh Chilledno-2.354+0.00
Processing: Fresh Frozenno-2.354+0.00
Processing: Fresh Refrigeratedno0.000+0.00
Processing: Fresh Shelfno-0.672+0.00
Processing: Dry Freeze Driedno6.629+0.00
Processing: Dry Air Driedno6.331+0.00
Processing: Dry Cold Pressedno-6.713+0.00
Processing: Dry Bakedno-6.713+0.00
Processing: Dry Extrudedyes-6.713-6.71
Processing: Dry Semi Moistno-6.174+0.00
Processing: Dry Mueslino-10.146+0.00
Processing: Wet Pateno-0.672+0.00
Processing: Wet Chunksno-0.672+0.00
Processing-type offset
+0.02
Subtotal
39.9
Final score
40/100

Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.

Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges

How the declared analysis compares with FEDIAF reference ranges for adult dogs. The label prints as-fed values; we convert to a dry-matter basis before scoring, and the bands are dry-matter ranges. Scores rise to 100 at the band midpoint: the reference is adequacy, not maximisation. Nutrients with a published upper limit taper again above it; fat is policed through calorie density rather than a direct penalty.

NutrientAs fed (label)Dry matter (scored)Score
Protein2830.9 (band 18.397790055248617 to 40%)100
Fat1819.9 (band 5.621546961325967 to 20%)100
Fibre2.42.7 (band 0.5 to 5%)98.7
Energy (kcal/100g)370408.8100

Scored over 4 declared nutrients (combined weight 60); undeclared nutrients do not affect the score. Moisture was not declared and was estimated at 9.5% from the food type.

No nutritional additives section declared on the label.

Low confidence: partial analysis or moisture estimated from the food type.

This measures agreement with published reference ranges, not suitability for an individual dog. For medical conditions, follow veterinary guidance.

Transparency: what the label discloses

How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.

ItemPoints
✓ Ingredient list on the label (mandatory)10/10
✗ Printed percentages on the label (voluntary) - not on file0/20
✗ Analytical constituents declared (mandatory) - not on file0/15
✗ Additives declared (mandatory) - not on file0/10
✓ Energy value declared (voluntary)5/5
✓ Complete/complementary designation (mandatory)5/5
✓ Feeding guidance given (mandatory)10/10
✗ Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory) - not on file0/10
✗ Country of manufacture stated (voluntary) - not on file0/10
✗ Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file0/5

Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Analytical constituents declared, Additives declared, Manufacturer identity and address, Batch and date labelling).

Safety: recall history

Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.

No recalls recorded in our database.

Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it

The claims made on the pack and product page, checked against the declared label. We record claims as stated; "consistent" means our stored label data supports the claim, "contradicted" means it conflicts with it. Functional claims are recorded but never scored.

100/100 · moderate — 1 checkable claim: 1 consistent, 0 contradicted.

Consistent with the label

  • "Cobber® Working Dog is a complete dog food, meeting the nutritional levels established by the Association of American Feed Control Officials (AAFCO) for maintenance of adult dogs" — supported by the declared complete and balanced data.

3 further claims on file that we cannot check against the label.

Moderate: every checkable claim is consistent with the declared label.

ClaimTypeCheckSubstantiation
Cobber Working Dog, with optimal protein, fat and vitamins and minerals, gives farm and station dogs everything they need to stay in top condition (on page)Functionalnot checkableManufacturer assertion
No artificial colours or flavours (on page)Free-fromnot checkableManufacturer assertion
Cobber® Working Dog is a complete dog food, meeting the nutritional levels established by the Association of American Feed Control Officials (AAFCO) for maintenance of adult dogs (on page)ContentconsistentManufacturer assertion
28% PROTEIN 18% FAT for sustained energy (on page)Nutrientnot checkableManufacturer assertion

The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.

Other products from Cobber

See all products from Cobber

Alternatives to Working Dog

Foods in our database that are similar on ingredients, protein, format or price. Scores and figures are from the same deterministic model used everywhere on the site.

See all alternatives

Community

Owners' verdict
0 votes

Comments (0)

No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.

Comments are reviewed before they appear.