BM Animals Complete Nutrition Premium BARF Style Puppy BULK
Raw · complete
Our verdict
Is BM Animals Complete Nutrition Premium BARF Style Puppy BULK a good dog food?
We score it 57/100 (Average). This reflects the ingredient quality, composition and label transparency of the recipe as declared on the label.
100% of this recipe has no printed percentage. Estimated shares are model estimates, not label facts.
Who is this food for?
Suits
- Labelled by the manufacturer for puppies
- Grain-free: no grain ingredients listed
- Doesn't list turkey, lamb, fish, venison, pork, duck as ingredients
Consider something else if:
- Your dog avoids chicken: the label lists chicken
- Your dog avoids beef: it is listed as an ingredient
- You want a single-protein recipe: this one lists more than one animal protein
These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Find foods that fit your dog.
Ingredients (12)100% of the recipe is estimated
Estimated composition
- meat 45.5%
- veg 23.0%
- oil 16.7%
- other 8.6%
- unknown 6.3%
| # | As declared | Matched | Label reading | Declared % | Est. % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Beef & Chicken Meat | Chicken | meat · medium | - | 10.8 |
| 2 | Lacto-Fermented Seasonal Fresh Fruit & Vegetables | Vegetables | veg · medium | - | 10.4 |
| 3 | BM Tripe | Tripe | meat · medium | - | 9.9 |
| 4 | BM Offal Mix | Offal | meat · medium | - | 9.5 |
| 5 | BM Omega Oil Blend | ProOil | oil · medium | - | 9.0 |
| 6 | BM Bone Broth | Cooking broth | other · medium | - | 8.6 |
| 7 | Minced Trachea | Trachea | meat · good | - | 8.1 |
| 8 | coconut oil | Coconut Oil | oil · medium | - | 7.7 |
| 9 | whole eggs | Egg | meat · good | - | 7.2 |
| 10 | kelp powder | Kelp | veg · good | - | 6.8 |
| 11 | keferrin | unmatched | - | - | 6.3 |
| 12 | zeolite & spirulina | Spirulina | veg · good | - | 5.9 |
- 1. Beef & Chicken Meat10.8% estimated
- 2. Lacto-Fermented Seasonal Fresh Fruit & Vegetables10.4% estimated
- 3. BM Tripe9.9% estimated
- 4. BM Offal Mix9.5% estimated
- 5. BM Omega Oil Blend9.0% estimated
- 6. BM Bone Broth8.6% estimated
- 7. Minced Trachea8.1% estimated
- 8. coconut oil7.7% estimated
- 9. whole eggs7.2% estimated
- 10. kelp powder6.8% estimated
- 11. keferrin6.3% estimated
- 12. zeolite & spirulina5.9% estimated
Trust and sourceNo recalls recorded in our database · checked 2026-09-19
Brand and contact: BM Animals Complete Nutrition
- Address
- Bayswater, Melbourne
Trust and provenance
- Recall history
- No recalls recorded in our database
- Label data last checked
- 2026-09-19
- Scored with
- Model v3 (methodology)
- Product page
- bmanimalscompletenutrition.net
Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.
Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.
Score details and methodologyCalculations, history and evidence
Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated
Why this score?
This recipe achieves an overall score of 57 out of 100 based on several key factors. The presence of ingredients without printed percentages reduced the score by -10.6. Conversely, the overall quality of the ingredient list added +5.9 to the total. Additionally, the oil and fat content lowered the score by -3.3, while being labelled nutritionally complete contributed +2.3.
Scored with model v3 on 2026-10-25. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.6 | 9.191 | +5.90 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 36.1% | -0.092 | -3.32 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 28.2% | -0.005 | -0.15 |
| Other share of dry matter | 0.9% | -0.375 | -0.35 |
| Unrecognised share of dry matter | 6.9% | -0.027 | -0.18 |
| Undeclared quantities | 100.0% | -0.106 | -10.56 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | yes | -3.158 | -3.16 |
| Processing multiplier | 1.12 | 33.786 | +37.84 |
| Processing: Raw | yes | -0.054 | -0.05 |
Show all 40 components
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.6 | 9.191 | +5.90 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 0.0% | 0.096 | +0.00 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.115 | +0.00 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 36.1% | -0.092 | -3.32 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 28.2% | -0.005 | -0.15 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 0.0% | 0.163 | +0.00 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.012 | +0.00 |
| Other share of dry matter | 0.9% | -0.375 | -0.35 |
| Unrecognised share of dry matter | 6.9% | -0.027 | -0.18 |
| Recipe graded poor | 0.0% | -0.065 | +0.00 |
| Poor-quality meat in recipe | 0.0% | -0.179 | +0.00 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 0 | -0.876 | +0.00 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 0.0% | 0.060 | +0.00 |
| Undeclared quantities | 100.0% | -0.106 | -10.56 |
| Prints ingredient percentages | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| Frozen or chilled fresh | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| High meat (30%+ of dry matter) | no | 0.707 | +0.00 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | yes | -3.158 | -3.16 |
| High carb and low meat | no | -1.180 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × printed percentages | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × fresh | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Fresh × high meat | 0.0 | 11.084 | +0.00 |
| Additive penalty | 0.00 | 0.222 | +0.00 |
| Processing multiplier | 1.12 | 33.786 | +37.84 |
| Processing: Raw | yes | -0.054 | -0.05 |
| Processing: Fresh Chilled | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Frozen | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Refrigerated | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Shelf | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Freeze Dried | no | 6.629 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Air Dried | no | 6.331 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Cold Pressed | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Baked | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Semi Moist | no | -6.174 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Muesli | no | -10.146 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Pate | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Chunks | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
- Processing-type offset
- -1.74
- Subtotal
- 57.4
- Final score
- 57/100
Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.
Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges
Analytical constituents not declared
No nutritional additives section declared on the label.
Transparency: what the label discloses
How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.
| Item | Points |
|---|---|
| Ingredient list on the label (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Printed percentages on the label (voluntary) - not on file | 0/20 |
| Analytical constituents declared (mandatory) - not on file | 0/15 |
| Additives declared (mandatory) - not on file | 0/10 |
| Energy value declared (voluntary) - not on file | 0/5 |
| Complete/complementary designation (mandatory) | 5/5 |
| Feeding guidance given (mandatory) - not on file | 0/10 |
| Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Country of manufacture stated (voluntary) | 10/10 |
| Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file | 0/5 |
Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Analytical constituents declared, Additives declared, Feeding guidance given, Batch and date labelling).
Safety: recall history
Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.
No recalls recorded in our database.
Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it
The claims made on the pack and product page, checked against the declared label. We record claims as stated; "consistent" means our stored label data supports the claim, "contradicted" means it conflicts with it. Functional claims are recorded but never scored.
Claims on file; none we can check against the label
| Claim | Type | Check | Substantiation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Perfectly formulated for the growing puppy (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Natural Tripe is added to our Premium Puppy BARF to encourage optimal digestion with natural digestive enzymes, probiotics and high Omega 3&6's (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| The probiotics in our Tripe acts to boost our dog's gut microflora, and can reduce the chances of developing intolerances in our adult dogs (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Natural anti-inflammatories from Tripe and our carefully selected herbs & vegetables can act to reduce growing pains and teething pain in our puppies (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Building on a grass-fed Beef & Free-Range Chicken base (on page) | provenance | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.
Alternatives to Premium BARF Style Puppy BULK
Similar on ingredients, protein, format or nutrition, using the same stored data.
Community0 comments
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.