Natural Rapport Allergy Soft Chews
Supplement complementary

Is Natural Rapport Allergy Soft Chews a good dog food?
This is a supplement, not a complete diet, so it is not scored on our 1-100 scale. The ingredient breakdown below shows what is in it; a supplement should be fed alongside, not instead of, a complete diet.
100% of this recipe has no printed percentage. Estimated shares are model estimates, not label facts.
- RecipeNot applicable
- NutritionalNot applicable
- Transparency50
- Safety100
- EvidenceNot recorded
Why you might choose it
The data we hold shows no standout strengths for this product.
Why you might not
- A supplement, not a complete diet: feed as an extra, not the whole diet.
- 3 poor-graded ingredients make up about 23% of the recipe.
- Meat makes up an estimated 0% of the dry matter; carbohydrates dominate.
Estimated composition
Typical analysis (as fed)
No analysis recorded yet.
Additives & feeding info
Nutritional additives
Vitamin C (Ascorbic Acid) 80 mg per 2 chews
Technological additives
Sorbic Acid; Mixed Tocopherols; Rosemary Extract
Feeding guide
Up to 25 lbs - 1 chew per day; 25 - 50 lbs - 2 chews per day; 50 - 75 lbs - 3 chews per day; 75+ lbs - 4 chews per day
Reviews
12 reviews on this product · 5.0/5
Who is this food for?
Suits
- Labelled by the manufacturer for adult dogs
- Doesn't list chicken, beef, turkey, lamb, fish, venison, pork, duck as ingredients
Consider something else if:
- Your dog avoids grain: the label lists oat flour
These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Use the homepage filter to find foods that fit your dog.
Ingredients (12)
| # | As declared | Matched | Category | Tier | Declared % | Est. % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Oat Flour | Oat Flour | carb | medium | - | 10.8 |
| 2 | Palm Fruit Oil | Fruit | veg | medium | - | 10.4 |
| 3 | Rice Flour | Rice flour | carb | medium | - | 9.9 |
| 4 | Rice Bran | Rice bran | fibre | good | - | 9.5 |
| 5 | Flaxseed | Linseed | veg | good | - | 9.0 |
| 6 | Natural Vegetable Flavoring | Artificial flavourings | additive | poor | - | 8.6 |
| 7 | Sunflower Lecithin | Lecithin | supplement | good | - | 8.1 |
| 8 | Powdered Cellulose | Powdered Cellulose | fibre | poor | - | 7.7 |
| 9 | Coconut Glycerin | Coconut | veg | good | - | 7.2 |
| 10 | Sorbic Acid | Sorbic acid | additive | poor | - | 6.8 |
| 11 | Rosemary Extract | Rosemary | veg | good | - | 6.3 |
| 12 | Mixed Tocopherols | Tocopherols | additive | good | - | 5.9 |
Brand
- Website
- https://nattyrap.com/
- [email protected]
Trust and provenance
- Recall history
- No recalls recorded in our database
- Label data last checked
- 2026-09-14
- Product page
- nattyrap.com
Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.
Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.
Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated
Scored with model v3 on 2026-09-26. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.4 | 9.191 | +3.57 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 25.8% | -0.115 | -2.97 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 16.2% | -0.005 | -0.08 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 26.4% | 0.163 | +4.29 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 10.3% | -0.012 | -0.13 |
| Recipe graded poor | 23.0% | -0.065 | -1.49 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 3 | -0.876 | -2.63 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 8.6% | 0.060 | +0.51 |
| Undeclared quantities | 100.0% | -0.106 | -10.56 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | yes | -3.158 | -3.16 |
| Additive penalty | -25.83 | 0.222 | -5.73 |
| Processing multiplier | 0.98 | 33.786 | +33.11 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | yes | -6.713 | -6.71 |
Show all 40 components
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.4 | 9.191 | +3.57 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 0.0% | 0.096 | +0.00 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 25.8% | -0.115 | -2.97 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.092 | +0.00 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 16.2% | -0.005 | -0.08 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 26.4% | 0.163 | +4.29 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 10.3% | -0.012 | -0.13 |
| Other share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.375 | +0.00 |
| Unrecognised share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.027 | +0.00 |
| Recipe graded poor | 23.0% | -0.065 | -1.49 |
| Poor-quality meat in recipe | 0.0% | -0.179 | +0.00 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 3 | -0.876 | -2.63 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 8.6% | 0.060 | +0.51 |
| Undeclared quantities | 100.0% | -0.106 | -10.56 |
| Prints ingredient percentages | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Complete diet | no | 2.294 | +0.00 |
| Frozen or chilled fresh | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| High meat (30%+ of dry matter) | no | 0.707 | +0.00 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | yes | -3.158 | -3.16 |
| High carb and low meat | no | -1.180 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × printed percentages | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × fresh | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Fresh × high meat | 0.0 | 11.084 | +0.00 |
| Additive penalty | -25.83 | 0.222 | -5.73 |
| Processing multiplier | 0.98 | 33.786 | +33.11 |
| Processing: Raw | no | -0.054 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Chilled | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Frozen | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Refrigerated | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Shelf | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Freeze Dried | no | 6.629 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Air Dried | no | 6.331 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Cold Pressed | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Baked | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | yes | -6.713 | -6.71 |
| Processing: Dry Semi Moist | no | -6.174 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Muesli | no | -10.146 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Pate | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Chunks | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
- Processing-type offset
- +0.02
- Additives declared on label
- +2 transparency bonus
- Subtotal
- 41.0
- Final score
- 41/100
Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.
This is not a complete diet, so the 1-100 rating does not apply to it. Read the recipe breakdown above as ingredient-quality context only.
Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges
Not applicable to complementary food. FEDIAF reference ranges apply to complete diets.
Transparency: what the label discloses
How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.
| Item | Points |
|---|---|
| Ingredient list on the label (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Printed percentages on the label (voluntary) - not on file | 0/20 |
| Analytical constituents declared (mandatory) - not on file | 0/15 |
| Additives declared (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Energy value declared (voluntary) - not on file | 0/5 |
| Complete/complementary designation (mandatory) | 5/5 |
| Feeding guidance given (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory) | 5/10 |
| Country of manufacture stated (voluntary) | 10/10 |
| Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file | 0/5 |
Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Analytical constituents declared, Batch and date labelling).
Safety: recall history
Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.
No recalls recorded in our database.
Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it
The claims made on the pack and product page, checked against the declared label. We record claims as stated; "consistent" means our stored label data supports the claim, "contradicted" means it conflicts with it. Functional claims are recorded but never scored.
Claims on file; none we can check against the label
| Claim | Type | Check | Substantiation |
|---|---|---|---|
| No artificial dyes (on page) | Free-from | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Cold pressed (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| No dairy (on page) | Free-from | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| No corn (on page) | Free-from | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| No artificial flavors (on page) | Free-from | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| No artificial colors (on page) | Free-from | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| No soy (on page) | Free-from | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| natural ingredients (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| No heat (on page) | Free-from | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| powerhouse natural ingredients like colostrum, kelp, and bee pollen which are known to alleviate your furry friend's itchy skin, hair loss, sneezing, wheezing, and watery eyes (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| supporting enhanced immune function (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| providing essential vitamins & minerals (on page) | Nutrient | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.
Other products from Natural Rapport
See all products from Natural Rapport
Community
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.




